The Apache were a strong, fierce, war-like nation, native to the arid deserts of the Southwest (specifically Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, and Oklahoma). And since 1492, the discovery of the Americas, the Apache fiercely opposed Spanish, Mexican, and American invasions. Arguably, they are most known and most remembered for their association with the Spanish, Mexicans, and Americans; the relationship between the Apache and the settlers that led into the Mexican and American conflicts and the aftermath of that, by how westward expansion in the United States affected the population of the Apaches and then how the laws during the 1800s influenced the forced removal of the Apache. These reasons show the relationship the settlers had with the Apache. …show more content…
Non-Indians in the south strongly supported the act. They were eager to have control of the land. This law was one of the laws passed in the 1800s that influenced the removal of the Apache. They faced a force removal. In 1875, the United States military forced an estimated 1500 Yavapai and Tonto Apache from Rio Verde Indian Reserve to treaty lands promised by the government. Both the young and old traveled through winter-flooded rivers, mountains, narrow canyon trails, to get to the Indian Agency (the treaty lands) at San Carlos, 180 miles away. The trek resulted in hundreds of lost lives. The Dawes act was passed in 1887, were each Native American family was offered 160 acres of land. The land could not be sold, thought, for 25 years. This law was passed in the hopes that the Indians wouldn’t be so dependent of the government, and after 25 years, participants were allowed to become citizens. The act though was resisted. In 1934 the act was terminated. This law also influenced the apache