Second Treatise of Government proposes government as a naturally occurring consequence of a state of nature. Inequality caused by market-based economies is an intentional and necessary path that bridges the spread between the state of nature to the existence of a commonwealth. In Locke’s presentation, unequal possession seems to be an inevitable consequence. This inequality, however, is a necessary transition out of the state of nature. The agreement to currency, and the injustice it brings, is the basis for the overall consent to the Commonwealth. The existence of inequality is naturally introduced and maintained throughout Locke’s argument. In the state of nature, men exist in a “state of perfect freedom” over their actions, possessions, and persons, bound by the laws, or law, of …show more content…
For this idea, the existence of money changes the value of human labor. Men are welcome to whatever they can produce, but they are not permitted to waste. If one creates a surplus, currency provides a means to transfer his labor to others and store this value for later. Money therefore only exists to store the value of work. This notion is far more profound because the ability of man to labor is unequal, and the ability of a man to obtain currency is also unequal. These forms of inequality form a clear path away from the state of nature. Society must be refined to allow men to perform better within the law of nature because the state of nature is admittedly imperfect. The inequality inherent in labor-defined property and currency should be moderated such that all men have the ability to obtain what is necessary for their survival and health. A contract must be created to punish those who violate the law of nature. It must preserve and regulate the property of those who use resources to ensure ensures the currency is a faithful store of labor