A strike is often seen as something heroic-the culmination of injustice and frustration finally coming to an end. However, every big action isn’t so simple. Workers shouldn’t be allowed to go on strike because public sympathy isn’t a guarantee, and there are drawbacks for the workers themselves. To begin with, workers on strike need the sympathy from the public.Without it, less people will listen to them, and the cause might even gain trepidation and disapproval. As evident in “New York School Bus Strike”, disrupting school buses can affect innocent kids and lead to angry parents. Public school students were forced to find alternative methods to get to school. This was an unappealing side effect of the strike, and such instances cause the movement to lose leverage. There wouldn’t have been such a disturbance in the city if the workers had chosen another way to deal with their issues, and not get citizens involved. Another example of strikes not garnering public sympathy is of a police union strike during 1919. It led to criminals on a rampage, an unhappy public,and was a “big setback for unions and labor in general.” Authority figures refusing to work does more damage than good. It hurts the …show more content…
Certain fields and government jobs don’t even have the legal rights to strike. The people who do strike aren’t paid during the period and face the possibility of being fired. The third article discusses this issue; talking about how, for example, teachers going on strike could pose a danger to their jobs. The parents who don't support them will complain. Despite however benevolent their intentions may be, strikers are still faced with the gamble of losing their source of income. Plus, there's many alternative options to draw attention to an issue. Methods such as petitions rarely ever damage anyone in the process. Strikes, if they should continue to be enforced, should never be a first