ipl-logo

Insanity Defense Essay

995 Words4 Pages

Since many centuries, the liability of the insane for crime has always been one of the most controversial questions in the Criminal Law. In fact, it is very controversial because insanity itself is difficult to define, and the circumstances in which insanity can be used as exculpatory evidence are difficult to characterize.
Insanity defense appeared before so many centuries, and according to California Law review, Crotty (1924) stated “The insane offender has been dealt with from the earliest times in English law. Probably the earliest authority is Theodoric, Archbishop of Canterbury (668-690 A.D.).” (p. 110)
In 1581, a treatise in Britain stated “If a madman or a natural fool, or a lunatic in the time of his lunacy do [kill a man], this is no felonious act for they cannot be said to have any understanding will.” In other words, those who are non compos mentis should not be found guilty because a person who is bereft of sanity lacks the intent required to perform a criminal act as a “moral agent”, i.e. mens rea is lacking in this case. Crotty (1924) reinforced this idea saying that:
[It is] where an insane person, during his madness, commits what would amount to murder or other felony; he is not punished, because of such insanity, with the awful punishment which the common law meted out to felons. The reasons assigned for this were: (i) that as the …show more content…

In fact, according to O.Linder (n.d.), John W. Hinckley, Jr., attempted to assassinate President Ronald Reagan, on March 30, 1981. Hinckley was found not guilty by reason of insanity, and was placed in a mental institution, St. Elizabeth's psychiatric hospital. However, the court’s decision resulted in public outcry, which urged Congress to enact legislation on the issue. In 1984, Congress passed the Insanity Defense Reform Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 17 [1988]) to abolish the irresistible-impulse test from federal

Show More
Related
464 Words | 2 Pages

Insanity is an illness an individual cannot overcome and will make decisions without thinking. Lacking the further knowledge of a criminal's mental state does not endorse the fate of acquiring the death

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

Dr. Mark Nolan, Senior Lecturer at ANU College of Law, says that the NGRI plea “enables defendants to avoid criminal liability and standard criminal punishment” (Nolan 8). The main disagreement with America is the focus whether if the “guilty defendant” pursues to misuse the “Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity” as an alternative to imprisonment or if the criminally accused was at the time of committing the crime “clinically insane” and in need psychotherapy. Therefore, during this discussion of opposing viewpoints concerning the insanity defense being misused or ethical are going to be

Read More
242 Words | 1 Pages

This argument is not seeking to deal with the question of civil detention of those suffering mental illness. So an insane person who has committed crime and was not aware of what he was doing should be not guilty, but could require to undergo compulsory treatment under civil law. The second argument was by Thomas Szasz. Szasz viewed that the mental illness is a myth created by mentally ill and

Read More
1775 Words | 8 Pages

The first insanity case was in 1843, in England. Daniel McNaughton killed the secretary of the British Prime Minister, because he disliked the Prime Minister. He was acquitted "by reason of insanity. He

Read More
1669 Words | 7 Pages

The Insanity Verdict on Trial written by Scott O. Lilienfeld. This article explains how the insanity defense originally came about, through Daniel McNaighton in 1843. McNaighton was acquitted after planning to kill the British Prime Minister and accidentally ending up killing his secretary. McNaighton’s reasoning behind the attack was that he thought the government was out to get him, thus a form of mental insanity. “Reacting to public anger to the verdict, a panel of judges fashioned a guideline for insanity, now called the McNaughton rule: to be declared insane, defendants must either not have known what they were doing at the time or not have realized their actions were wrong” (Lilienfeld).

Read More
2397 Words | 10 Pages

According to Smith, the recognition of mental illnesses have forced the courts to question legal culpability (6). For example, the 1724 case Rex v. Arnold introduced the principle of “proof of insanity as an exemption from intent” (Smith 6). This led to the adoption of the “Durham Criterion,” in which the courts find that the defendant is not legally responsible if they are proven to have “substantial incapacity to conform to the law” (Smith 13). If we compare the legal history of mental illness to Szasz’s claims that mental illness is a myth, the legal treatment of psychopathy can be shown as another form of toleration. Szasz states that the myth of mental illness functions to create a “social intercourse [that] would be harmonious, satisfying, and the secure basis of a good life” (96).

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

Insanity can happen by brain deficiencies or the environment you grew up in and also how you were raised. At the moment of the crimes that people make they don’t know right from wrong when they have a psychotic episode. The real question is should people with insanity be punished for what they have done and could they control what they were doing at the time.

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

(66). The criminal is aware that he murdered someone, yet shows no remorse. A person who is criminally insane does not understand the effects and consequences of their actions, and therefore cannot take responsibility for them. The murderer also hides his wrongdoings from the police. If he were criminally insane, he would not have to lie about his actions.

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

Insanity defense of seen as being one of the most controversial of all criminal defense strategies. also, it is also one of the least uses criminal defense strategies. However, in 1984 when it was being used by John W Hinckley, Jr attempted the assassination of President Ronald Reagan, the insanity defense was used to provoke a public debate. The insanity defense purpose is used so criminal defendants should not be found guilty due to the defendant's insanity, but pleading as insanity refers to a specific dysfunction. A person who us insane lacks the intent requites to perform said a criminal act because the individual does not know that they act of crime they have committed is wrong or cannot control their actions even when they are aware that the act is wrong.

Read More
1564 Words | 7 Pages

However there are several interpretations that connect this phenomenon to the cultural circumstances in which Poe lived. John Cleman argues in his essay “Irresistible Impulses: Edgar Allan Poe and the Insanity Defense” that this notion first appeared in England, due to several trials that ended up declaring the criminal mentally ill, so that the person was able to avoid punishment. At the beginning these people were not distinguished from criminals, but throughout the time, due to several reforms, finally they were placed in asylums, where they got the proper medical treatment. This state of being was claimed not culpable, through the fact that those people did not show the signs of rationality. (Cleman, 625-626) Cleman claims that this affected Poe, especially two cases, where the murderers were acquitted; James Wood, who killed his own daughter and Singleton Mercer, who murdered his sister’s seducer.

Read More
1667 Words | 7 Pages

This case, while Monte Durham wasn’t able to be proven insane, lead to reformations of the M’naghten Rule that would eventually be called the Durham Rule. Going back to Fersch’ book, this would implement more scientific approaches to determine if somebody was legally insane (3). Later in 1984, President Reagan would implement the Comprehensive Crime Control Act that required criminals to prove that they are mentally insane. With the history of the insanity defense concluded, let us take a look at some cases where the insanity defense is involved as the criminal’s reason for their

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

An incident where pleading insanity worked in one’s favor is heard in the case of Lee Robin. Lee Robin was a 30-year-old doctor who was charged with murder of his wife and his two year old daughter. Robin admitted to killing his wife with an ax and drowning his infant daughter. After the murders, Robin called the police and reported that there was “a problem” at his home. Soon after, the police arrived.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

There is a difference between being legally insane and having diminished capacity. This meaning that not all cases would be so black and white. The insanity plea would not cover somebody who at the time of the crime may not have been in complete control of his or her actions, but their intent was clear. This is where many become confused. They believe that anybody can claim that they are insane and get away with the crime.

Read More
1814 Words | 8 Pages

A greek philosopher named Aristotle once said “If a madman or a natural fool, or a lunatic in the time of his lunacy do [kill a man], this is no felonious act, for they cannot be said to have any understanding or will.” The insanity plea is an immensely controversial topic. Some of history’s most heinous criminals have exploited it. Its controversy stems from the notion that those who claim insanity are absolved of responsibility for their crimes. The insanity plea also commonly called the insanity defense is shockingly hardly used and has an exceedingly even lower success rate.

Read More
1528 Words | 7 Pages

In England during the 19th century courts had to use the “Right and Wrong” test, the jury had to decide if the defendant comprehended what they did was wrong at the time and if they understood the outcome of their actions. That was later named in 1843, the M’Naghten Rule. There are many types of Insanity Defense in England, but the US has more, we have 51 types of defense; one for each state law and one for each federal one. Some states only allow mens rea defenses, which is when someone lacks the knowledge of what they did was wrong. While other states only allow actus rea defenses, where the defendant lacks the ability to not commit the

Read More

More about Insanity Defense Essay

Related Topics

Open Document