ipl-logo

Integral Review Essay

417 Words2 Pages

Jazmine, Great forum post this week on your assigned yes perspective in regards to evolutionary psychology (EP). Although, I personally don’t rely on just one theory, after reading your post I gained a better understanding of EP, and was intrigued to conduct more research. It has been argued that evolutionary psychology may provide a metatheory for psychology and the other social sciences, however, evolutionary psychology is considered to be an overarching theory whose principles can be applied to all fields in the social sciences (Ploeger, 2010). Our assigned text has even stated as you mentioned that “Evolution is a good explanation for psychological concepts for the simple fact that it “provides the best meta-theory for explaining and understanding human psychology” (Gantt & …show more content…

While I will not deny the fact that within the past years EP has been successful as its own discipline, it is not a comprehensive theory for psychological concepts. The main reason as to why is due to the lack of substantial evidence regarding cognition and psychological mechanisms being adaptation (Ploeger, 2010). While there are studies and research out there that provide an evolutionary hypotheses but there is still no research or studies created to attain this evidence.
A recent article I read in Integral Review by Wallis (2010) stated that “What we seem to have overlooked is that a science, much like a bird, must have two strong wings if it is to fly. Empirical facts are understood in the light of a specific theory... And, theory is built from a careful consideration of the facts”. Science consist of theory and research, those two are what defines science. Neither one can exist without the other, they are also inseparable – existing in a generative yin-yang relationship (Wallis,

Show More
Related
581 Words | 3 Pages

Scientific research is methodical. Created from a desire to make the unknown known, the “scientific method” was created in the 15th century based on common sense. As Barry analysis the scientific process, he says that the unknown must be made into a tool, even against one’s own ideas and beliefs. However, that concept is tenuous, so Barry uses logical situations to present the idea.

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

Scientific Research and the Unknown Scientific research can be defined using a number of different methods. John M. Barry writes about the scientific process in The Great Influenza, and he uses several different tactics in characterizing it. Barry uses metaphors and unusual syntax in order to characterize scientific research as uncertain and unknown. Barry compares scientific research to venturing into the wilderness in order to characterize it as a journey into the unknown. He begins this comparison by explaining that the best scientists “move deep into a wilderness region where they know almost nothing, where the very tools and techniques needed to clear the wilderness, to bring order to it, do not exist” (Barry 26-29).

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

The scientific method is paramount to scientists and their studies. Barry affirms, “Ultimately a scientist

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

Barry uses this to show how researchers must make decisions on how to do something while not having a very structured knowledge foundation for that specific topic of interest. Together, the uses of these similar structures allows for a more cohesive train of thought about the characteristics of scientific

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

Psychology is from many other ideas and theories about science that were brought up and put to the world to see. An example is Nicolaus Copernicus, published the idea of the world not being the center of the universe but in fact, revolved around the sun. So overall, as the history of alternative perspectives about science evolve, so did psychology. 2) Explain the three early psychologies.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

” Using facts about what Einstein, a well known scientist who has earned ethos, helps Barry characterize scientific research. Once again the reason Einstein is such an effective person to compare your findings to is because of his

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

In conclusion, the characteristics of the scientific method are far from few. Most distinctly, science deals with the uncertainty of the unknown, attempting to make it known. Though complicated, Barry explains his beliefs on the scientific method with strong diction to show the formality of science, rhetorical questions to show the uncertainty, and logos to show the intellect of science. His rhetorical strategies help the audience understand the plethora of characteristics in the realm of

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

Science has three assumptions about reality which are, the universe is composed of matter and energy, through experimentation the truth can be found, and that humanity is indifferent from nature (Brodd

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout my academic life, every question and concept that has derived from human interrelations has been answered by scientific research. In my social research class, we have

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

According to Zeus “A true hero isn’t measured by the size of his strength, but by the strength of his HEART.” In the Odyssey, Odysseus tries to get home to his wife and son, but he always seems to get set back. Along the way, Odysseus faces obstacles on his journey home. Odysseus shows he is a hero throughout the story when he saves his crew from the Cyclops, he makes sure his crew doesn’t die from the Siren’s songs, and he had the favor of Zeus against the men he fought for his kingdom, highlighting that he was the hero in Zeus’ eyes. Odysseus having the favor of Zeus is a big deal because he taught good meaning, Odysseus is a hero.

Read More
925 Words | 4 Pages

To contribute to his argument, John Barry divulged the aspects of those who do practice diligence in their work by creating a scenario that makes the reader ponder about credibility and uncertainty among scientists. In order to make the reader envisage the results of negligence, John Barry depicted a situation of poor diligence to allow the reader to be acknowledged of the negative consequences of remiss research. According to Barry, he advocated that shoddy research leads to appalling repercussions, leaving colleagues to “pave roads over the path laid”. In other words, Barry suggesting that once a scientist has gathered “accurate” information, researchers will believe the scientists, thus creating more conflict over time. The author intentionally included this scenario in order to enlighten and startle the audience of the negative possibilities that can occur when one’s work is not proven evident and accurate.

Read More
1161 Words | 5 Pages

Kobo (Kimifusa) Abe is a well-known Japanese author. Abe’s book The Face of Another won the Yomiuri Literature Prize in 1960 (Zolbrod). His work first began to receive international attention during his travel to Eastern Europe (Price, Magill’s). His writing was influenced by his childhood and culture which is prevalent in his novels The Face of Another and Woman in the Dunes.

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

1. I JoyRose Mahl will use the first grade level for this discussion. 2. The psychodynamic theory is associated with, Sigmund Freud and Erik Erikson. Theorists who support this theory state, early childhood experiences play a major part in later development of a child’s personality, even if it is buried in there unconscious.

Read More
1410 Words | 6 Pages

A number of basic standards for determining a body of knowledge, methodology, or practice are widely agreed upon by scientists. One of the basic notion is that all experimental results should be reproducible, and able to be verified by other individuals.[13] This standard aim to ensure experiments can be measurably reproduced under the same conditions, allowing further investigation to characterize whether a hypothesis or theory related to given phenomena is valid and reliable. Philosopher Karl Popper (?) in one of his project attempted to draw the line between science and pseudo-science.

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

Karl Popper was a twentieth-century philosopher that had a dissatisfaction with the definition of what could be considered a “science.” The claim of falsification, being able to equally be observed false, made Popper’s argument of demarcation appealing to those with the same inquiries about the method of scientific progress. Popper said to be defined as a real science, one needs to make risky, bold predictions that could easily be refuted by observation. I will argue that the construction of Popper’s scientific progress is flawed due to the refutations of infinite hypotheses and observational unreliability.

Read More

More about Integral Review Essay

Related Topics

Open Document