ipl-logo

Interrogators Use Of Evidence In Confessions

1521 Words7 Pages

Techniques interrogators use Interrogators uses various techniques in order to gain a confession and close the case. Some techniques interrogators use are more widely accepted than others because they range in levels of deceitfulness and presentation of evidence.
We will have evidence ploy This ploy is more widely accepted because interrogators can state that physical evidence was recovered, and it will implicate the true perpetrator. Then, interrogators can state that they did find physical evidence at the scene of the crime and they are checking to see it is a match to the suspect. When this method is used, it does not back a suspect into a corner with accusations that the physical evidence is a match to them, but just states that some type of physical evidence was collected. This allows interrogators to view the reaction of the news to the suspects. A suspect who is guilty may start to offer explanations of how that is not possible or even tell the police that they are lying. However, a suspect who is innocent will start to relax because they know that the forensic evidence will clear them of any involvement.
We have evidence ploy …show more content…

Investigators may claim that an eye witness has come forward, that they failed a lie detector test, or that they have DNA evidence against the suspect (Janda, 2015). This technique needs to be banned because it can produce highly unreliable confessions. Suspects often feel trapped and feel that there is no other way out then to confess. Furthermore, interrogators often threaten suspects with harsh incarceration times and offer leniency if they make a confession. This may be enough to make an innocent person confess to avoid the death penalty or longer prison

Show More
Related

Murder Of Gaven Brooks Essay

444 Words | 2 Pages

Every day forensic investigators use tactics just like the ones that were discussed throughout the paper. It’s more than just looking for an admission of guilt, and interrogating potential suspects until they

Read More

Legal Issues Involved In The Norfolk Four Cases

936 Words | 4 Pages

PAPER 1: FALSE CONFESSION ASSIGNMENT Legal issues involved in the interrogation of criminal suspects are the leading cause for wrongful conviction of innocent individuals based off of false confessions. The primary motive for police officials is to close a case with a written and verbal confession from a possible suspect. Confessions override evidence if the confession is convincing enough to the jurors. Most people assume that people would not confess to a crime they didn’t commit, but due to the harsh interrogation circumstances, psychological coercion and situation factors, these can influence an innocent individual to confess to a crime they didn’t commit.

Read More

Michael Crowe Confessions: A Case Study

994 Words | 4 Pages

Forensic psychology focuses on legal matters such as mental state examinations of criminal defendants, child custody/family law, violence risk assessment, civil law, social science research, mediation/dispute resolution, etc… But in this case, we will be focusing on the matter of “false confessions”. This is seen mainly in interrogations between the interrogator and a suspect. It is when a suspect confesses to a crime and maybe even believes they committed the crime, even though they have not. A confession would be defined as an admission of guilt, whereas a false confession is the admission of guilt by an innocent.

Read More

Case Summary: The Jonbenet Ramsey Case

2174 Words | 9 Pages

138). The reason this step is so important to getting a confession is because the more a person issues a denial the less likely it is that they will later confess to the acquisition. The key to handling a denial is knowing when a denial might be coming. You can sometimes tell when a denial is coming by nonverbal gestures from the person you are interrogating, an innocent person will not give you too many gestures before a denial because they are truthful and feel angered by your acquisition. While a guilty person will feel the need to be polite and wait for their turn to talk giving such gestures as leaning forward in their chair or maybe putting their hands on the table while the interrogator is still talking these are your clues that a denial might occur and you immediately try and shut it down.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Reid Technique

911 Words | 4 Pages

In early interrogations it was common for police officers to use physically abusive interrogation techniques such as the rubber hose to convince suspects to confess to a crime, whether they are innocent of guilty. Fred Inbau came up with a different technique that relied on presenting a large amount of fabricated or true evidence to get the suspect to confess. This technique was very effective in getting confessions, it has an 80% confession rate. Unfortunately, some of the confessions are false confessions, we do not know how many exactly. The first step of the Reid Technique, a similar coercive technique to the one Inbau devised, was to watch the suspect and determine whether or not he or she is lying during the interrogation based on behavioral analysis; which is severely flawed and does not actually help us determine if someone is lying.

Read More

False Confessions In West Of Memphis

803 Words | 4 Pages

The aspect of psychology and law research from this week is correlated to the week four-course material is most relevant to the topic of interrogations and false confession techniques that are used by the detectives. In the case that was presented in the documentary West of Memphis is an investigation of a failure of justice in Arkansas. The interrogation methods from the detectives lead to a false confession. A false confession is an admission to a criminal act that the confessor did not commit (Greene & Heilbrun, 2014, p. 165).

Read More

False Confessions Pros And Cons

1020 Words | 5 Pages

A common reason that individuals have confessed to crimes they haven 't committed, is due to being under extreme duress or coerced by investigators determined to get to the bottom of cases. (2) Once an investigator has decided that an individual is guilty, it becomes less about the actual crime and more about this individual molding their idea of what happened to that of the investigators. Investigators will withhold food and water. Sometimes interrogating for hours. (2) As time progresses individuals become more desperate and some individuals will even begin to believe that what investigators are telling them is the truth.

Read More

Analysis Of False Confession Tapes

541 Words | 3 Pages

In the Netflix Original show, The Confession Tapes, viewers are exposed to six criminal cases in which people falsely confessed to murder. While the circumstances differ from case to case, the main reasons for why these false confessions happened remains rather constant. First, each defendant was subjected to numerous hours of interrogation without the presence of a lawyer. Second, the prosecutors and detectives involved in each case were overly confident about the suspects and they neglected other leads in this process. Also, the communities engaged in these cases had a very high regard for police authority, and during the trials, the juries were swayed by the elaborate narratives of the prosecutors.

Read More

False Confessions During Interrogations

948 Words | 4 Pages

Over the years people have confessed to crimes they have not committed. People have went to jail and sent to jail for crimes they did not commit, because of the intimation they endured during their interrogation. For instance, some people are physically, mentally, and emotionally threatened during interrogations. People are afraid so they often give false confessions or someone else name in an attempt to remove themselves from the situation. However, if psychologist were present during interrogations they would most likely be able to prevent false confessions.

Read More

Root Sins In Criminal Justice

557 Words | 3 Pages

Police officers are able to use a variety of powerful psychological ploys to extract confessions from criminal suspects, including the use of deception during interrogation. For example, in the case Frazier v. Cupp, the

Read More

False Confession Pros And Cons

1195 Words | 5 Pages

Another key factor that is the cause of false confessions is the sociological games that investigators play with a suspect. Moushey insists that Steven Drizin stated that the police interrogation, often tries to confirm the guilt of a suspect rather than figuring out the truth (Moushey). From this, persons are more likely to answer easily to broad questions such as the ones interrogators use to prove the guilt of a suspect, it is also easier to fall into the range of guilt from the answer of the broad questions since it is not as specific. In his article "The Nation; Illinois Poised...", Weinstein reveled that a former commander of a Chicago police district is being investigated for claims that suspects were tortured into confessing at his station (Weinstein).

Read More

Arguments Against Police Deception

2054 Words | 9 Pages

Now, instead of using force and abuse, these techniques have been replaced by deception and manipulation to gather information from suspects (Leo, 1992). Although the use of deception during

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Confessions

724 Words | 3 Pages

Consequently, when interrogators go into interviews believing the suspect is guilty, it brings on intense amounts of stress, putting suspects at a higher risk to crack under pressure. E. This increased pressure brought on by misclassified interrogations cause innocent suspects to feel so much stress they confess to a crime they did not commit. F. Misclassified errors are just one way suspects feel their only option is to give a false confession in order escape the pressure in the interrogation room. II.

Read More

Ethical Issues In Interrogation

999 Words | 4 Pages

To be a good interrogator it requires more than confidence and creativity although it does help, but interrogators are very well trained in the mental tactics of social impact. An interrogators task is to get someone to confess to a crime, but it is not easy. While it isn’t easy for them, sometimes they will end up with confessions from the innocent testifies because of the expertise in psychological manipulation interrogators have. The interrogation process has been manipulated over the years and they are using unethical approaches to gain information or a confession from suspects. But in the law of confessions, it is required that confessions are not coerced but be voluntary so that it is admitted into evidence.

Read More

How To Obtain False Confessions

786 Words | 4 Pages

Indeed, for people who are not familiar with modern psychological techniques of interrogation might be absurd that someone would confess to an offense he or she didn 't commit. In a study conducted by Leo and Liu, 264 students were selected as potential jurors and were first asked to rate 18 different interrogation techniques. The participants had to rate according to their own perception how coercive each technique was, how likely it was to elicit a false confession and how likely to elicit a true confession. Later on, they were also asked to evaluate confessions in association with other types of evidence like eyewitness testimony, DNA evidence, and a suspect 's bad character

Read More

More about Interrogators Use Of Evidence In Confessions

Related Topics

Open Document