ipl-logo

Interrogators Use Of Evidence In Confessions

1521 Words7 Pages

Techniques interrogators use Interrogators uses various techniques in order to gain a confession and close the case. Some techniques interrogators use are more widely accepted than others because they range in levels of deceitfulness and presentation of evidence.
We will have evidence ploy This ploy is more widely accepted because interrogators can state that physical evidence was recovered, and it will implicate the true perpetrator. Then, interrogators can state that they did find physical evidence at the scene of the crime and they are checking to see it is a match to the suspect. When this method is used, it does not back a suspect into a corner with accusations that the physical evidence is a match to them, but just states that some type of physical evidence was collected. This allows interrogators to view the reaction of the news to the suspects. A suspect who is guilty may start to offer explanations of how that is not possible or even tell the police that they are lying. However, a suspect who is innocent will start to relax because they know that the forensic evidence will clear them of any involvement.
We have evidence ploy …show more content…

Investigators may claim that an eye witness has come forward, that they failed a lie detector test, or that they have DNA evidence against the suspect (Janda, 2015). This technique needs to be banned because it can produce highly unreliable confessions. Suspects often feel trapped and feel that there is no other way out then to confess. Furthermore, interrogators often threaten suspects with harsh incarceration times and offer leniency if they make a confession. This may be enough to make an innocent person confess to avoid the death penalty or longer prison

Show More
Related
936 Words | 4 Pages

PAPER 1: FALSE CONFESSION ASSIGNMENT Legal issues involved in the interrogation of criminal suspects are the leading cause for wrongful conviction of innocent individuals based off of false confessions. The primary motive for police officials is to close a case with a written and verbal confession from a possible suspect. Confessions override evidence if the confession is convincing enough to the jurors. Most people assume that people would not confess to a crime they didn’t commit, but due to the harsh interrogation circumstances, psychological coercion and situation factors, these can influence an innocent individual to confess to a crime they didn’t commit.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

Now that these false confessions have been brought to light, there is an innocence project organization which helps prevent wrongful convictions by informing people and starting actions against harsh interrogation tactics. So far, there are a little over 20 states in America that record interrogations and hopefully, many more are to come. In Canada, the Supreme Court makes it clear that, “…it may seem counterintuitive that people would confess to a crime that they did not

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

“Hey, Kiddo” by Jarrett J. Krosoczka is a touching and deeply moving graphic novel. I recommend this graphic novel because while I don't normally read graphic novels, I enjoy reading memoirs. I think that the fact that it's a real story makes it more personal and heartfelt. In particular, I liked the genre, the main character Jarrett and the water paint-like artistic style of the text. Set in Worcester, Massachusetts, this novel tells Jarrett’s journey through childhood and adolescence, revealing the challenges he faced growing up with a very complicated family life.

Read More
1246 Words | 5 Pages

Examining these factors can make it easier to understand the inherent risks of obtaining confessions from vulnerable populations and the need for legal safeguards to prevent miscarriages of justice. From a very early age, society emphasizes the importance of trusting and following the guidance of authority figures, especially law enforcement

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

The police then determine if the suspect is guilty and continuously interrogate, accuse, and even threaten the suspect for hours until they confess, whether they are guilty or not. On many occasions the people who are coerced into false confessions are have severe mental impairments that prevent them from functioning as a normal person with out the impairments would.

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

Interrogation induces false confessions to tend to occur in more serious cases like homicides and other high stakes felonies when the police are under pressure to solve the crime and that use more psychologically coercive

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

False Confessions One of the biggest problems that our criminal justice system is facing is false confessions, whether they are coerced or done for attention. In an article written by the Innocence Project, it states "More than 1 out of every 4 people wrongfully convicted but later exonerated by DNA evidence made a false confession or incriminating statement. "(1). What would lead someone to open their lives to judgment and persecution, by confessing to a crime that they didn 't commit? There are many possible reasons, ranging from duress, ignorance when it comes to community laws, and mental impairment.

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

In the Netflix Original show, The Confession Tapes, viewers are exposed to six criminal cases in which people falsely confessed to murder. While the circumstances differ from case to case, the main reasons for why these false confessions happened remains rather constant. First, each defendant was subjected to numerous hours of interrogation without the presence of a lawyer. Second, the prosecutors and detectives involved in each case were overly confident about the suspects and they neglected other leads in this process. Also, the communities engaged in these cases had a very high regard for police authority, and during the trials, the juries were swayed by the elaborate narratives of the prosecutors.

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

Every day forensic investigators use tactics just like the ones that were discussed throughout the paper. It’s more than just looking for an admission of guilt, and interrogating potential suspects until they

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

According to Stephen Porter, Katherine Rose, and Tianna Dilley, author and researcher of Enhanced Interrogations: The Expanding Roles of Psychology in Police Investigations in Canada believes psychologist can prevent false confessions (36). Having a psychologist present during an interrogation will lower the chances of a false confession, because they will be able to identify signs that someone is lying. Namely, psychologist will notice their body language and pay attention to the details they are giving in their confession. Psychologist will be able to tell if a person is giving a false confession. In addition, having a psychologist present during an interrogation can affect how detectives interact with suspects.

Read More
1195 Words | 5 Pages

This is one of many tactics that police use throughout the nation to force a confession out, which often leads to the false confessions by the

Read More
2054 Words | 9 Pages

Police use all different types of deception. An example of deception that police have the ability to use is a false evidence ploy. A couple of examples of this type of deception are telling the defendant that their friend/co-defendant already confessed to the crime or claiming they have DNA evidence from the suspect (Selby 2022). Although this type of deception may seem coercive, it is often viewed as a necessary tactic to obtain voluntary and accurate confessions (Najdowsk & Bonventre, 2014). However, when police use deception as a method

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

However, the suspect can report afterwards how they did not want to confess and were forced to and because police station rooms are video recorded, the evidence will hold up in court. On the other hand, non-coercive techniques are mostly used and result in voluntary confessions. This is because when using non-coercive techniques, and officer will simply speak to the suspect and try to understand and relate to them to gain trust. By gaining their trust they are able to temporarily bond, which result in the suspect opening up and confessing. These confessions are admissible in court because no rights are violated in order to obtain the

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

Other psychological tactics, such as coercion, are used in the interrogation room to attempt to get a confession out of someone interrogators believe are guilty. A. Stressing the incontrovertible evidence that proved the suspect's guilt; • Providing a reason for their lack of memory (stress, alcohol blackout,

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

“Courts have permitted the interrogators to tell the suspect that if he confesses his conscience will be comforted or they will inform the suspect’s cooperation to the court” (Richard 2008). It is unethical to promise and give hope to the suspect that will not be met in order to obtain a voluntary confession which are induced. During interrogation someone may walk in and hide his identity like being a police officer, while acting like someone else and promise the suspect that he or she is here to help and they are in good hands. Doing this is violating the rights of the suspect and should be taken into consideration, because it inflicts the mind of a suspect. If the suspect is going to confess it should be voluntary not being forced to “voluntary

Read More

More about Interrogators Use Of Evidence In Confessions

Related Topics

Open Document