ipl-logo

Legal Issues Involved In The Norfolk Four Cases

936 Words4 Pages

PAPER 1: FALSE CONFESSION ASSIGNMENT Legal issues involved in the interrogation of criminal suspects are the leading cause for wrongful conviction of innocent individuals based off of false confessions. The primary motive for police officials is to close a case with a written and verbal confession from a possible suspect. Confessions override evidence if the confession is convincing enough to the jurors. Most people assume that people would not confess to a crime they didn’t commit, but due to the harsh interrogation circumstances, psychological coercion and situation factors, these can influence an innocent individual to confess to a crime they didn’t commit. Even though there are certain laws that protect individuals from false confessions …show more content…

Next suspect involved in the Norfolk Four case was Joe Dick. Joe Dick growing up was socially awkward and a loner. Joe was psychologically coerced into providing a false confession during interrogation. During Joe’s interrogation he was told his DNA was found at the scene of the crime (even though his DNA didn’t match what was found on the victim), along with a visual image of the murdered victim. The visual proof mentally disturbed Joe, psychology coercing him to internalize the belief that he had committed this crime. Similar situation to Carol Richardson a young girl who was also convicted of being involved in the bombing of the Guilford Four, and was psychologically coerced into providing a false confession. During Robinsons appeal process a psychologist concluded that Robinson was, “vulnerable to interrogative pressure and that she was prone to avoid conflict and please others when faced with social pressure.”(pg.52, MOT) While Carole was going though withdrawals from her medication (barbiturate) after being detained for three days; she was having difficulty remembering and started to internally believe that she was involved in the bombing. Psychologists Gudjonsson and Mackeith diagnosed her as having “memory distrust syndrome”- which is when an individual comes to have faith in his or her memory for a crime and succumbs to police pressure by …show more content…

The four suspects in each case had to serve sentences, but later released after the correct offenders were caught. The only difference was that the Norfolk Four individuals were still considered involved in the murder even though they arrested the correct suspect. The Norfolk four have to register as sex offenders, have a hard time maintaining livelihood and are still waiting to have their name cleared from the convictions. The Guilford four was eventually given monetary compensation, cleared names and a formal

Show More
Related
1367 Words | 6 Pages

The Case of Leighton Hay Leighton Hay was a 19-year-old Jamaican-born Canadian citizen who was wrongfully convicted of first-degree murder in 2002. This started with an altercation that broke out at midnight when four men and a woman tried to enter a nightclub without paying a cover charge. Later, those intruders left but three men with handguns came into the club and two of them made it into the kitchen where they shot Colin Moore eight times who was the brother of the person who was organizing the event that was taking place that evening (Roger Moore). In the kitchen, there were two more people aside from the brothers, Colin’s wife (Jennifer Moore) and a friend (Leisa Maillard). Jennifer ended up identifying one of the shooters as Gary Eunick.

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

Myesha Morrison - ADJU 201/06765 – Case: Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279 (1991) Facts: Mr. Oreste Fulminante was arrested and imprisoned for a crime in Florida. While in prison, a confidential informant working for the FBI approached Fulminante and questioned him about the death of his 11 year old step-daughter. The informant, Anthony Sarivola offered Fulminante protection from the harassment and harsh treatment he was receiving in prison if he confessed to the murder of his step-daughter. Fuulminate subsequently confessed to the murder. Upon his release for the original crime, he also confessed to Sarivola's wife.

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

The legal factors of this case are the level of crime that has been committed is a very high-level. The strength of the evidence is not to strong since the detectives did not thoroughly go over fingerprints or follow up on what had been the alibis. The detectives thought the eyewitness and forced confession would be enough to close this

Read More
711 Words | 3 Pages

If the victim could have correctly remembered his attacker, the right person would have been convicted instead of the wrong

Read More
182 Words | 1 Pages

The United States Supreme Court in the Packingham v. North Carolina first amendment case has ruled in favor of Lester Gerard Packingham. The state from now on may not bar social media access to registered sex offenders. The case’s build up dates back to 2002 when 21 year old college student Lester G. Packingham had a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old girl. For involvement with a minor he received a 10-12 month sentence, but having never met problems with the law, the judge required him to go on a 24 month probation and register as a sex offender. Five years had passed and in 2008 North Carolina forbid any person on the sex offender list to use any type of social media.

Read More
1029 Words | 5 Pages

In the trial of the four Norfolk sailors, the main reason why they were all convicted was not the proclaimed evidence that wasn’t on the scene, but was the confessions that they were coerced to say during the interrogations. There was virtually no evidence against the four sailors, but the jury sided that they were all guilty. The major problem during the trial was that no evidence was found at the crime scene and the prosecution only badgered the four sailors based on confessions that they were threatened to say or else they

Read More
2099 Words | 9 Pages

This is the main reform recommended by the Innocence Project. In order for this reform to be effective the entire interrogation must be recorded or else it will be pointless as corrupt interrogation techniques could be hidden by not recording them. Just recording the confession also avoids showing the events that led up to the confession preventing analysis of its validity. A full recording will help prove the authenticity and credibility of confessions and show the reliability of testimonies. The recording can also show whether information was unintentionally given to a suspect during questioning by the interrogators and was then repeated back to the interrogator by the suspect making them seem guilty.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Another prisoner at the jail said Miguel confessed to him and he testified for a reduced sentence (Cameron). This shows the prisoner lied to get a reduced sentence. 15% of wrongful convictions had another prisoner confessed against the victim (Cameron). The author states this to show how prisoners will lie for reduced sentences and plea deals. In the modern era of the death penalty, Around half of the death row inmates who have been wrongfully convicted have been convicted by prison informants (Balko).

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

The police then determine if the suspect is guilty and continuously interrogate, accuse, and even threaten the suspect for hours until they confess, whether they are guilty or not. On many occasions the people who are coerced into false confessions are have severe mental impairments that prevent them from functioning as a normal person with out the impairments would.

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

False Confessions One of the biggest problems that our criminal justice system is facing is false confessions, whether they are coerced or done for attention. In an article written by the Innocence Project, it states "More than 1 out of every 4 people wrongfully convicted but later exonerated by DNA evidence made a false confession or incriminating statement. "(1). What would lead someone to open their lives to judgment and persecution, by confessing to a crime that they didn 't commit? There are many possible reasons, ranging from duress, ignorance when it comes to community laws, and mental impairment.

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

The principle in law that one is innocent until proven guilty has created much discourse. There are those who feel that the moment that one is arrested, there is reasonable belief that they committed the crime. However, there are those who feel that just as the principle states, one is, and should be taken as a victim and the outcome could be either way: guilty or not guilty. In fact, this argument is supported by the many cases of malicious prosecutions and mistaken identities.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

The fifth amendment to the United States constitution should remain just as it is, meaning that no person should be forced to provide incriminating evidence against themselves. And to do so would go against the natural law of self preservation. But by not compelling a person to provide evidence against themselves offers one relief from perjury in order to preserve themselves. The speaker equates not answering to lying which is incorrect, the speakers strawman example of not answering a spouse is an untruth and is an unrealistic example.

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

Can false incriminating evidence lead people to accept being guilty for a crime they did not commit? Why is sleep important when it comes crime confession and can it impact our cognitive abilities? Yes, and apparently there are many reason in why this might happen. For instance, minimization, is a technique where the detective lulls the suspect into false sense of security by providing face-saving excuses, by blaming the victim.

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

“Courts have permitted the interrogators to tell the suspect that if he confesses his conscience will be comforted or they will inform the suspect’s cooperation to the court” (Richard 2008). It is unethical to promise and give hope to the suspect that will not be met in order to obtain a voluntary confession which are induced. During interrogation someone may walk in and hide his identity like being a police officer, while acting like someone else and promise the suspect that he or she is here to help and they are in good hands. Doing this is violating the rights of the suspect and should be taken into consideration, because it inflicts the mind of a suspect. If the suspect is going to confess it should be voluntary not being forced to “voluntary

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

There are those who are innocent but have been declared

Read More

More about Legal Issues Involved In The Norfolk Four Cases

Related Topics

Open Document