Packingham V. North Carolina First Amendment Case Study
On 7/13/15 worker made an unannounced visit to the residence of Mr. Lawson Lovett, for the purpose of monitoring the situation and gathering information. During today 's home visit, Mr. Bobby Lovett informed worker he did not want to fill out VA NH application because he had done that before and Mr. Lawson Lovett was denied due to him registered as a sex offender. Mr. Bobby Lovett provided worker with documentation. The documentation stated the crime happened in Biloxi Mississippi 4/28/1993. According to Mr. Bobby Lovett, Mr. Lawson Lovett returned to Alabama in 1998 or 1999.
Kentucky v. King 1 Audelio Camacho Professor Alva AJ 180 3-27-17 Kentucky v. King The Supreme Court Case of Kentucky v. King occurred on October 2005, when Police officers in Lexington, Kentucky did a “buy bust operation in which a confidential informant attempted to buy crack cocaine from a suspected drug dealer.” The undercover was police officer Gibbons. When officer Gibbons gave the signal that the transaction was completed, the police approached the scene with their marked police cars. Once they were close to the suspect, Officer Gibbons radioed in a description of the suspect and said that King had gone through a specific hallway at a apartment complex. As the officers got to the hallway, a door was shut closed and the officers smelled
Business Law Case Study Essay: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S (2014) Facts: The Green family runs and owns Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., a national arts and skills chain that has over 500 stores and they have over 13,000 employees. Other facts of the case are that the Green family has been able to organize the business around the values of the Christian faith and has explicitly expressed the desire to run the company as told by Biblical principles, one of which is the belief that the utilization of contraception is wicked. Also, the facts show that under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), occupation -founded group health care plans must offer certain sorts of preventative care, for example, FDA-accepted contraceptive approaches.
The police actions were unjustifiable and unwarranted in this situation. In the court care of Tennessee v. Garner, the Supreme Court ruled that, “deadly force may not be used unless there is a reasonable cause to believe there is a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others exists” (Hendrix, 2013, page 194). The use of physical force should not be used in the manner of vindictiveness, retaliation, or punishment purposes. This display of action is unprofessional and is against the code of conduct. The suspect’s actions of getting out of her vehicle warranted the use of force, because she approached the officer in a threating manner.
Mr. Carroll is a Tier 3 Sex Offender on GPS Monitoring. On 02/28/17 0530, Officer Mason received phone call from the Dover Monitoring Center in regards to Mr. Carroll GPS anklet. Mr. Carroll has a strap tamper and Officer Mason and RP responded to Mr. Carroll’s last GPS location 448 North Street Milford, DE 19963 (Mr. Carroll’s mother residence). When Officer Mason and RP responded to the residence, Officer Mason noticed that she did not have the proper equipment to fix Mr. Carroll’s strap.
Megan Kanka was seven-years-old when she was brutally raped and murdered by a neighbor Jesse Timmendequas on December 7, 1986. Prior to killing Megan Kanke, Jesse Timmendequas was convicted of sexually assaulting two young girls and sentenced to prison (Glaberson, 1996). Upon his release from prison, Jesse moved into the neighborhood where Megan lived with her family, Jesse lured Megan to his home where he brutally raped and murdered her (Glaberson, 1996). This horrific case is what lead to the enactment of Megan’s Law which was first signed into law in 1996. Megan’s Law was an amendment to the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act of 1994 (National Alert Registry, n.d.).
The first study conducted by by J.J. Prescott of the University of Michigan and Johan Rockoff of Columbia University, established that requiring sex offenders to register with police may significantly reduce the chances that they will re-offend. But, this same research also found that making that same registry information available to the broader public may not go as planned, leading to higher overall rates of sex crime. On the other hand a study by University of Chicago PhD. Student Amanda Agan found no findings that sex offender registries actually worked in increasing public safety (University of Chicago Press Journals, 2011). Data from 15 states was examined over a ten year period by both Prescott and Rockoff on the evolution of sex offense rates during the time states passed and began enforcing their registration and notification laws.
Megan’s Law is a federal law that has changed the course of the criminal justice system in the United States of America. Prior to Megan’s law, convicted sex offenders were able to easily re-offend due to lack of public notification. In the year 2000, it is estimated that there were more than 248,000 sexual victimizations and over an 8-year period in the United States there were 366,460 attempted or completed rapes and sexual assaults (Welchans, 2005). The prevalence of sexual assault, rape, and pedophilia in the United States has sparked a large conversation over the last decade, which has led to the creation of several laws, including Megan’s Law. This analysis of Megan’s Law will focus on the positive aspects that implementing this law has
The United States constitution and the North Carolina constitution were both created to initiate a form a government at their own levels, and to give those governments specific powers. Both constitutions have similar outlines of their executive, legislative, and judicial branches, and include an article that secures the rights of citizens through the legal systems. Although they bear conspicuous similarities, such as structure, the state and U.S. constitutions do exhibit differences as well. Possibly the most recognizable distinction between the two constitutions is that the North Carolina constitution has a basis of religion. The preamble states that the people of North Carolina are “grateful to Almighty God, the Sovereign Ruler of Nations”.
Should Sex Offenders Name be Public? It is debatable if sex offenders names should be public, some people believe is a invasion of there private life, “There is a real danger of vigilantism and publicizing their names (and the info required goes far beyond just their names) is an invasion of privacy of the wives, children and families of these offenders, which is an invasion of privacy no other class of criminal faces”(debate.org) . Others believe this is not even debatable, that Sex offenders name should be public, period, “Once somebody commits a sexual crime, they have given up their right to anonymity.
Megan’s Law is a federal law enacted in 1996 and required law enforcement authorities to make information available to the public regarding registered sex offenders (Megan's Law & The Adam Walsh Child Protection Act, 2000). Beforehand, sex offenders were only required to register with local law enforcement and were not required to notify the public of their status. Megan Kanka, a 7 year old girl, was raped and murdered by a twice-convicted sex offender living across the street from her. Her parents went on to attempt to change the law by demanding mandatory community notification of sex offenders. Megan’s Law was finally passed due to public opinion from Megan Kanka’s death, the unanimous decision in House and Senate, and the contributions
I believe that the existence of sex offender registries can offer a positive effect especially for families and parents who want to know if a certain community is safe for their children and it also helps police officers narrow down the location if an offender committed another criminal act. If anything, I believe that the registries need to be updated and not abolished completely. The activities of a sex offender should in fact be monitored and tracked. However, registered sex offenders who committed less serious acts should not be registered for a lifetime. One stupid mistake a person made years ago should not make them a sex offender for life.
All sex offender are required to wear a satellite monitoring devices to locate their location. It has been establishing by the law that once a sex-offender is release from prison that he or she will have to be monitor for the rest of their lives. However, the sex-offender register is in place for the safety of the offender and the community. Because of the nature of this crime, it is untreatable due to a mindset that only the offender can free themselves from when they allow a therapy to help. I am not concerned with a drug dealer or murder because a drug dealer can not focus themselves upon a person unless that person has a desire for the drug and a murder may have committed their crime in order to protect themselves or they lost themselves
Policies have supported Megan’s Law despite the absence of evidence creating a variety of problems within states that Megan’s Law has achieved its goal. While notification laws and access to sex offender databases may give parents a sense of security, they may distract parents from paying attention to friends and family members who pose a potentially higher risk than the sex offenders on state registries. (Larson, 2016) The number of unreported sex crimes committed by registered sex offenders relative to the number of individuals without a record of sexual offenses is unknown. (Bonnar-Kidd, 2010)
Some criminal convictions in Florida carry penalties beyond just possible jail time and fines. Those convicted of certain sex crimes are required to register as sex offenders, even after they have served their sentences. Whether it is to stay off of the grid, to avoid the social stigma or for other reasons, however, some may fail to register. Regardless of the reasoning, failing to register as a sex offender may be considered a serious offense, and could result in additional penalties.
More about Packingham V. North Carolina First Amendment Case Study
Lawson Lovett Case Study
262 Words | 2 PagesKentucky V. King: Supreme Court Case
392 Words | 2 PagesCase Study: Burwell V. Hobby
1454 Words | 6 PagesTennessee V. Garner: Case Study
148 Words | 1 PagesGps Case Studies
540 Words | 3 PagesMegan's Law Essay
507 Words | 3 PagesFlorida Public Safety Information Act Case Study
1495 Words | 6 PagesMegan's Law Essay
914 Words | 4 PagesEssay On North Carolina Constitution
266 Words | 2 PagesShould Sex Offenders Be Public
1379 Words | 6 PagesMegan's Law Essay
1001 Words | 5 PagesNegative Effects Of Sex Offender Registries
128 Words | 1 PagesSex Offender Register In Criminal Justice
175 Words | 1 PagesMegan's Law Case Study
997 Words | 4 PagesFailing To Register As Sex Offenders Essay
514 Words | 3 Pages