ipl-logo

Into The Wild, By Jon Krakauer

608 Words3 Pages

In the eyes of Chris McCandless, the relationship between self and society are antagonistic. McCandless perspective gives an insight on how self and society cannot be companionable until he finds his true meaning deep within the wild. The relationship between self and society was developed throughout Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer who reported the story of Chris McCandless going into the wilderness and never coming back to modern society alive. Throughout the book, the reader is given more insight to McCandless reasons of leaving a gluttonous society where he could’ve been successful but modern society success is polar opposite from his definition of success. In the beginning of Into The Wild, the author reports his and the people perspective McCandless met and befriended during his odyssey to his new life. McCandless was eager to escaped the poison of the society, “There was no talking the guy out of it...he was determined. Real gung ho. The word that comes to mind is excited. He couldn’t wait to head out there and get started.” Gallien remember (pg. 6) McCandless could be described …show more content…

He believed that society does not want a person to be them self because it conflicts with society and the hegemonic power. McCandless went into the wild to be independent, to find meaning in his new life, and escape everything he hated but many readers believe negatively about his character. “The prevailing Alaska wisdom held that McCandless was simply one more dreamy half-cocked greenhorn who went into the country expecting to find answers to all his problems and instead found only mosquitoes and a lonely death.” (pg. 72) There are many reason why McCandless decided to drop his life many people would die for and go to the wilderness but I believe his biggest reason was because he could not find his true himself in a materialistic and ungrateful society which is why he left to nothing to start something for

Open Document