ipl-logo

Investigators Will Provide Witness Instructions Before Presenting A Lineup

719 Words3 Pages

1. Investigators Will Only Use One Type of Identification Procedure
Investigators may not show a lineup to a witness if that witness has already participated in any other identification procedure involving the same suspect.
Exception: Investigators may use additional identification procedures if directed by a prosecutor.
2. Investigators Will Select Fillers for Lineups
When choosing fillers, investigators will consider what level of description of the suspect has been provided by the witness(es) and select fillers who generally fit that description.
When there is a limited or inadequate description of the suspect provided by the witness, or the description differs significantly from the suspect, investigators will select fillers who resemble …show more content…

(optional) Typically inmates are cooperative, but always consider officer safety when dealing with individuals suspected of a crime

9. Administrators Shall Provide Witness Instructions before Presenting a Lineup
Before presenting a lineup, the administrator will instruct the witness that:
- The witness will view a group of subjects.
- The witness should not feel that he or she has to make an identification.
- It is just as important to clear innocent persons from suspicion as to identify guilty parties.
- The person who committed the crime may or may not be present.
- Regardless of whether or not an identification is made, the police will continue to investigate the incident.
- Additional instructions for sequential lineups:
- Individual persons will be viewed one at a time.
- The people in the group are in random order.
- A victim or witness may take as much time as needed making a decision about each person before moving to the next.
- All persons will be presented, even if an identification is made.
10. Administrators Will Ask the Witness for a Confidence Statement
If a witness makes an identification, the administrator will ask the witness to describe, in his or her own words, how confident he or she is in the

Show More
Related
1247 Words | 5 Pages

Statement of Facts: The prisoner was made to wear a green shirt in a lineup because it was important to the case. No other participant in the lineup was wearing a green shirt. Victim did not see the assailant’s face but knew he wore a green shirt. Issues: Was the fact that the prisoner was the only one who was made to wear a green shirt make the lineup impermissibly suggestive?

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

Detectives emphasized to David that the assailant may or may not be in the photo line up. Detectives also "told him they had arrested the man who raped him, and asked him to pick the assailant out of a photographic lineup. " David then picked Larry Youngblood as his assailant out of the photo line up. Although the photo lineup that David was given was reliable many other parts of this case were not.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

A police lineup identification was made by one of the victims. The flashlight that resembled the one used by the real assailant and the rubber from his shoe being consistent with the rubber found at one of the crime

Read More
1230 Words | 5 Pages

The reliability and admissibility of evidence becomes a foundation to this truth as any evidence presented cannot contain elements which can provide doubt towards the validity of the prosecution. This can be shown through guideline 14 of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions agreement to provide advice for the NSW police towards the legal limitations or consequences of evidence obtained during the course of an investigation (Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions n.d). Identification evidence in particular has a lower weight and strength for admission to a court due to the fallibility and circumstantial nature of witnesses. The admissibility of identification evidence was previously determined by judges based on its quality with case law such as R v. Christie providing principles for discretionary powers for admissibility and Alexander v. R providing methods satisfactory to the court for identification such as identification parades under common law. (R v. Christie 1914; Alexander v. R 1981).

Read More
396 Words | 2 Pages

Meyers was walking down the staircase of the apartment complex when he first came into contact with the officers on scene. Ordering Meyers to stop, he was immediately detained and subjected to an investigatory stop. Yet, officers did not know the identity of their suspect prior to Meyers’ detainment. Because officers were unaware as to the suspect’s identity, it suggests they did not know whether Meyers was parlayed to a crime, a victim, a suspect and or even armed. Nonetheless, officers acted based on unknown information at the time and therefore lacked the specific and articulable facts to establish reasonable suspicion that Meyers engaged in criminal activity.

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

He says that when a suspect is not in a line up, witnesses will tend to pick the most similar to the criminal. The two key properties of eyewitness testimony is that it is often unreliable and highly persuasive. Recognition memory is rapid so if someone takes longer than 10-15 secs then they are not using reliable recognition memory. Showing a photo one by one is more effective and accurate as it allows the victim to compare each photo to their memory rather than each other. A study person was undertaking whereby 300 participants viewed deliberately shaky footage of a man putting a bomb down an airshaft.

Read More
1194 Words | 5 Pages

While he was being questioned, the officers showed the victim a photo of Mr. Ruiz, “the victim identified Mr. Ruiz in a photo array of suspects

Read More
1097 Words | 5 Pages

In 1984, Dennis Brown offered to be a filler in a police lineup to be presented to a rape victim (Innocence 1). This information already highlights the issue with his conviction, because the victim observing the lineup could easily mistake people that look alike. Another issue with his conviction is the way in which he was convicted. The victim observing the lineup chose Dennis, out of everybody else, without proper

Read More
1407 Words | 6 Pages

The police place him in a lineup to have the victim identify who he was but she was unable to. Even though she was not able to identify him, police still had his description of his truck which led him to the police station anyways so they proceeded to interrogate him to see if they could

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

Before Givens stopped Mr. Crowder, he verified Mr. Crowder and the blue truck, like the officer in White verified the suspect and the vehicle. Even though Officer Givens thought the pickup was black at first, Givens had known Crowder long enough that Givens most likely could correctly identify him ─ even at night. But, these facts could be considered mundane, like the facts corroborated concerning the defendant’s identity and car in Kennison. But, like the officer in White, Givens also corroborated the destination, and the presence of the third-party (the semi) the anonymous caller mentioned before the stop occurred.

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Effects of post identification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 334–346. Lindsay, R., & Wells, G. (1985). Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556–564.

Read More
1529 Words | 7 Pages

Secondly, although LJ identified someone she recognised, mistakes can still be made even in cases of ‘close relatives and friends’. The Devlin Report talks of ‘the extent to which a man may deceive himself’ and interaction between witnesses and suspects can distort recollections. Therefore, an Identification parade would have been useful to test the reliability of the identification

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

As the watched, a vehicle being driven by a male subject picked up another male subject who physical stature matched the defendant’s. The detectives were unable to positively identify the passenger. Once again, officers attempted to conduct a traffic stop on the vehicle. The driver fled and drove through a highly populated neighborhood at a high rate of speed; the pursuit was terminated for the safety of the public. Later on the same day, the officers were watching a second area of interest.

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

In the simultaneous line-up, witnesses overestimate their ability to make an identification, resulting in misidentifications. This is due the nature of judgements, promoted by the simultaneous line-up, relative

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

Furthermore, there can be several factors at play when a wrongful conviction occurs and each case is unique. Three of the more common and detrimental factors that will be explored in this essay are eyewitness error, the use of jailhouse informants and professional and institutional misconduct. Firstly, eyewitness testimony can be a major contributor to a conviction and is an important factor in wrongful conviction (Campbell & Denov, 2016, p. 227). Witness recall and, frankly, the human emory are not as reliable as previously thought. In fact there has been much research showing the problems with eyewitness testimony such as suggestive police interviewing, unconscious transference, and malleability of confidence (Campbell & Denov, 2016, p.227).

Read More

More about Investigators Will Provide Witness Instructions Before Presenting A Lineup

Related Topics

Open Document