ipl-logo

Second Trial Of Ronald Cotton V.

797 Words4 Pages

In July of 1984, in Alamance County in North Carolina, an assailant broke into the victim’s – Jennifer Thompson-Cannino – apartment and attacked and raped her. Later on that same night, the same assailant broke into another apartment, attacked and raped a second woman. Jennifer Thompson-Cannino, was a 22-year-old college student at the time. She had never met the defendant, Ronald Cotton, until she picked him out of a line-up as her attacker and rapist. Ronald Cotton was initially convicted based only on the victim identifying him as her attacker. There was no evidence or a rape kit that was done to prove that he was the one that sexually assaulted her. There were no other eyewitness accounts to the fact. The victim picked him out of a line-up …show more content…

In January of 1985, he was convicted by a jury of one count of rape and one count of burglary. In a second trial in 1987, he was convicted of both rapes and two counts of burglary. Cotton’s alibi was supported by family members. During the trial, the jury was not allowed to hear evidence that the second victim failed to pick Cotton out of either a photo array or a police lineup. The prosecution based on its case on the points that a photo identification was made by one of the victims. A police lineup identification was made by one of the victims. The flashlight that resembled the one used by the real assailant and the rubber from his shoe being consistent with the rubber found at one of the crime …show more content…

The samples from one victim were too deteriorated to be conclusive, but the samples from the other victim’s vaginal swab and underwear were subjected to PCR based DNA testing and it showed no match to Richard Cotton. At the request of the defense, the results were sent to the State Bureau of Investigation’s DNA database, containing the DNA patterns of convicted felons in North Carolina prisons. The DNA proved to be a match for the convict who earlier confessed that he was the one who actually committed the

Show More
Related
1667 Words | 7 Pages

Even when Michael’s new defense team, through the innocence project, found a crime that was eerily similar to the method of murder and subsequent events to the one that Michael was convicted of, the new prosecutor in Williamson County fought hard to keep DNA testing from taking place, even stating that they objected to the testing now because the defense hadn’t requested it before (Morton, 2014). There was further evidence of ineffectiveness in that the coroner who’d changed his estimated time of death between the autopsy and trial, had come under scrutiny for his findings in this case, as well as several others, with claims of gross errors “including one case where he came to the conclusion that a man who’d been stabbed in the back had committed suicide” (Morton, 2014). This was only one of the many injustices that were committed against Michael Morton throughout his trial. In August of 2006, the defense was finally granted permission to perform DNA testing on the items that had been taken from his wife’s body (Morton, 2014). Although this testing did not reveal any information about the guilty party, it did at least give Michael the knowledge that Chris was not sexually violated before or after her death (Morton,

Read More
906 Words | 4 Pages

Another inmate, Ernest Ray Willis, had a case that was freakishly similar to Willingham’s. In 1987, Willis had been convicted of setting a fire, in West Texas, that killed two women. Willis told investigators that he had been sleeping on a friend’s living-room couch and woke up to a house full of smoke. He said that he tried to rouse one of the women, who was sleeping in another room, but the flames and smoke drove him back, and he ran out the front door before the house exploded with flames. Witnesses maintained that Willis had acted suspiciously; he moved his car out of the yard, and didn’t show “any emotion,” as one volunteer firefighter put it.

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

Ronald Cotton Eyewitness Misidentification The Ronald Cotton case is well known for the fact that misidentification happens when having a victim identifying a suspect and how detrimental this misidentification can be to someone. It is clear in many ways that identification is unreliable. Ronald Cotton was wrongfully convicted due to the fact that a witness had chosen him rather than the real perpetrator. This happened due to the fact that the victim, Jennifer Thompson Cannino, had an altered memory of the situation. But, within this case, there was also the issue that the victims felt as though their feelings and experiences were being dismissed, which did not help in getting the correct person held responsible.

Read More
1150 Words | 5 Pages

Mary Therese McCormick September 15, 2017 Innocence Project Research Paper Timothy Cole Timothy Cole served 22 of his 25-year sentence before his death in 1999 while in prison for a crime he did not commit. Newly developed DNA evidence proved his innocence and exonerated Cole almost a decade later. Another man was identified as the perpetrator and sent to prison. On March 24, 1985, Michele Jean Murray, a 20-year-old Texas Tech student, was parking her car in a vacant church parking lot across from her dormitory when an African-American man approached her and asked for her help start his car with jumper cables.

Read More
1674 Words | 7 Pages

Even though they were roommates, speculation of “contamination” does not prove the innocence of the suspect. Obviously, clear DNA evidence existed linking each suspect to the crime scene along with its significance in the

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

He then committed the same crime to another woman 1 mile away from her home, that night. Ronald cotton worked near the scene of both rapes and had a criminal record for sexual assault as a teenager and breaking and entering. When Ron gave his alibi he accidently had his weekends confused giving the detective an idea that he was lying. Both on photo and physical line up, Jennifer had chosen Ron Cotton and evidence of clothes and foam from his shoes added to the testimony. Ron was charged with rape and burglary and the sentence given was life plus 54 years.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

On novermber 5th, Brown was pulled over by a police officer and was asked to be a stand in for a police line up case. A female police officer took him back to the shareffs station to put orange on so he can stand in. The victim identified him as the perpertrator who raped her. After the line up four days later, Dennis Brown was taken to jail and accused him of rape. "I denied the perpetrator as him, then was taken to a holding cell" (exoneree

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

She was a highly ambitious young woman determined to carry out the plan she had for her life. She maintained straight A’s and planned to graduate with a perfect GPA and then marry her boyfriend Paul. However, her life as she knew it came to an end when on July 29th, 1984, she woke up to find a stranger in her room. The unidentified man proceeded to hold a knife to her throat and brutally rape her. Despite her panic, she tried to stay as calm as possible with the intention of trying to remember as many details about her attacker as she could.

Read More
134 Words | 1 Pages

The trial that was held two days ago included an innocent man, Mr. Tom Robinson, being tried in court for rape and abuse. Miss Mayella was badly beaten on the right side of her face. For Mr. Robinson to beat Ms. Ewell on the right side of her face it would require him using his left hand. When Tom was a boy, he got his arm caught in a cotton gin while working for Mr. Dolphin Raymond. When his arm got caught in the gin, it made his left arm twelve inches shorter than his right.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

William T. Johnson, also known as the barber of Natchez, was a slave until his freedom from who is thought to be his father, William Johnson, in the year of 1820. His “father” let him go when he was eleven years of age. He was freed after Amy, his mother, in the year of 1814, and Adelia, his sister, in the year of 1818. He had sixteen slaves and his eleventh child was born at the time of his murder in the year of 1851. He was murdered at the age of forty-two.

Read More
1518 Words | 7 Pages

Putting Yourself in Cotton’s Shoes: The Importance of Scientifically Reliable Evidence The book Picking Cotton written by Jennifer Thompson-Cannino and R. Cotton with E. Torneo is a collaborated memoir of a survivor of a brutal rape crime who suffered from a long post-traumatic stress disorder and the man she wrongly identified and sent to prison for 11 years for the crime that he did not commit. The memoir illustrates the painful tragedy of the victims - Jennifer Thompson and Ronald Cotton, from one rape crime and a faulty criminal process and how they learned to forgive and recovered from their past becoming friends and later come to work together to fight for the same cause. When I first read this book the story didn't spark my interest,

Read More
927 Words | 4 Pages

Innocence is is a lack of guilt, with respect to any kind of crime, or wrongdoing. In a legal context, innocence refers to the lack of legal guilt of an individual, with respect to a crime. Being convicted of a crime and found not guilty later on can frustrate the convict and the convict’s family as the time spent behind bars, is time they will never get back. James Richardson was convicted and charged for murder and rape in Cross Lanes, West Virginia on May 18, 1989. First, Richardson noticed the neighbor’s house burning.

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

The victim describes to the judge how on March 1997, she came home from a friend's wedding party where she was kidnapped at gunpoint from her condominium parking lot near Quail Corners shopping center. Vaughan then raped her in her car and forced her to withdraw money from an ATM machine, then left her on a deserted road and stole her car. Word of a serial rapist terrified Charlotte residents in early 1998, until a fingerprint at one of the crime scenes led investigators to Vaughan. Vaughan turned himself in and confessed to each crime, investigators said. The 21-year-old Charlotte man pleaded guilty to the rape charges and 33 other crimes, including kidnappings, sex offenses, robberies, burglaries, house and car break-ins, larcenies and credit card theft.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Dr. Pagliaro the supervising criminalist, testified that seminal fluid was detected on the victim's underwear and testing was conducted. The result matched the victim’s blood type, but were inconclusive regarding Barnes. Also DNA testing conducted before the trial were inconclusive. Three forms of unvalidated forensic science were used against Barnes at trial, however. Pagliaro testified that she conducted a photographic overlay of the victim’s jeans and use a print from Barnes truck and determined that the two patterns were similar.

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

In the Criminal Justice system, the criminal procedure process sometimes has issues in which can confuse and alter the way certain convictions play out. One major issue is false eyewitness testimony. This has a big impact on our legal system because its inaccuracy can cause innocent people to be convicted of serious crimes. People such as Ronald Cotton are wrongfully convicted all the time due to information that can sometimes be unreliable. Some issues regarding identity include lineups, photo arrays, eyewitness identification, and jury bias.

Read More

More about Second Trial Of Ronald Cotton V.

Related Topics

Open Document