ipl-logo

Invisible Enemy Research Paper

2928 Words12 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of stand your ground law

`

Invisible Enemy: Our Right To Defend Ourselves Against The Unknown

By:
Jaysen Basu

Instructor: Dr. Tillman

Research Writing Methods Summr-Cmp 2014 VC01

July 19, 2014

Defend yourself from criminal aggression

Introduction
Our country’s crime rate has been steadily climbing for quite some time. It is hard to predict when, not if, one will become a victim of a violent crime. It is far better to be prepared for such an event than it is to ask oneself if they will become the targets of the violent perpetrator that exist in our country today. How can one be prepared you might ask? Well, there are a variety of ways one can prepare for certain situations. One of those ways is to carry a gun with you for self-defense purposes. Just …show more content…

Stand Your Ground gives you the right to defend yourself, even if doing so causes you to kill the attacker. This concept stems from the Castle Doctrine where one has the right to defend their home, AKA their castle. In Stand Your Ground, you have the same rights as you do with the Castle doctrine except for the fact that this is used when you are away from your home. You may use lethal force as long as you are in an area where you can legally carry a firearm or you have a right to be there. In the case of Brown v. United States, Brown was attacked with a knife at his workplace. Although his workplace was not Brown’s home, the Supreme Court stated that Brown had a legal right to be where he was and that he faced grave danger if he ran from the perpetrator because the knife was already drawn (Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335, 1921). Cases like this occur far too often in the US and having a law such as the Stand your Ground Law is important for self defense. Obviously one must not take advantage of such laws to try to get away with murder; that is a different …show more content…

The “Castle Doctrine” or popularly known “Stand Your Ground” law has its explanation and powers different in various above mentioned states. In-fact, few states have authorized its citizen to use power and armed resources to deal with the situation of self-defense without any need to think of consequences. The law will protect the person who is on right. These provisions have been adopted following the crime prevailing ratios in the states and where the rescue forces cannot reach due to some constraints (Christopher Reinhart, 2007).

Use of Deadly Force Warranted? When a person experiences a situation where their life is in imminent danger, the only alternative is to retaliate by using deadly force. The use of deadly force is not intended so that people can get away with murder. Many courts have put a label on a case by case basis where they say that a reasonable person can perceive that their life is in danger they can use deadly force. If my life was in danger and I was backed into a corner, I would say yes, the use of deadly force is warranted.

The Future Of Self-Defense

Show More
Related
1480 Words | 6 Pages

According to law from State of Berea College, self-defense occur with a following situation for Ponder and Yilma: (1) When the defendant believes that such force is necessary to protect himself against the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by the other person (2) Deadly force is justifiable to protect himself against serious injury, rape, kidnap or death. Based on characteristic of Walter White, a victim, we can assume that he is not a typical good man, and two girls have to be prepare for dangerous

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

When training to become a police officer, you are always trained to use a fire arm as the last resort depending on what the situation might be. Even though Michael Brown did attack Officer Wilson as stated above, as a police officer you are supposed to know how to fight a suspect since that is what police officers learn how to do in training before being inducted to become an official police officer. The grand jury and people, who were being interviewed to get their intake about the situation, believed that Officer Wilsons only choice was to use his fire arm in order to defend for himself against Michael Brown. When word got out to the world, this caused a huge wave of protests to occur that Michael Brown should have still been alive and given a proper rule of justice in the State of Missouri. As time passed on, the situation only got worse due to the fact that buildings started to catch on fire and small business reported to have been

Read More
1615 Words | 7 Pages

If you feel that your life is in danger you have the right to kill the person even if you could have gotten away. It does not matter if the person has a weapon or not. It is simply a perceived threat. George Zimmerman was found not guilty and used “Stand your Ground Law” to get off. The killing of Trayvon Martin caused many people to take another look at the law.

Read More
247 Words | 1 Pages

It is not right for an officer to use deadly force if no physically actions or

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

One common opinion is that officers should not use more force than is necessary or reasonable, and even then, that force should be used only as a last resort. “Police use force to affect civilians’ conduct. On a day-to-day basis, they do so most often by employing the least degree of force available to them, their mere presence. Cops wear uniforms and drive distinctly marked cars so that, without saying a word, they may have an effect on citizens’ behavior” (Fyfe, 38). When an officer’s presence fails to fulfill the desired conduct, the next course of action for said officer would be verbalization.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

”In other words if you are attacked you must defend yourself so that your enemy doesn’t even consider attacking again. If you own a gun and a burglar invades your home what do you do? You shoot him. You make sure he doesn't steal your things or harm you so you disable him.

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

There quite possibly can be dangerous times where it is crucial for a gun owner to use his weapon in self-defense. If it is between a shooter’s life or a victim’s life, I believe the victim has every right to take the shooter’s life in defense of his own. I know

Read More
1518 Words | 7 Pages

Although the specifics vary by state, a common implementation as seen in the state of Alabama is that "as long as someone is somewhere lawfully and is not engaged in illegal activity, the person has no duty to retreat from an attack and has the right to stand his or her ground” (Fair). In states that do not have stand your ground laws, a victim is expected to make every possible attempt to flee from their attacker before resorting to fighting back (Roberts). This creates a potentially dangerous situation, where a victim of violent crime sacrifices their upper hand in a confrontation out of an attempt to adhere with the law. This also empowers the attackers, as they know that their victims cannot legally fight back with lethal force. Stand your ground laws create a situation where criminals are immediately stopped in the act.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

It is about being able to defend oneself and perhaps others if a situation presents

Read More
1683 Words | 7 Pages

For decades now, the controversy over deadly force has continued to show up in the news when police officers have acted in a manner that some citizens find just while others deem completely unfair. Many lawsuits stemming from shootings and crimes have found their way to local courts or the Supreme Court to deal with this issue. A portion of the U.S. population finds deadly force unnecessary when non-lethal weapons such as pepper spray or batons just as easily subdue the criminal. In addition, these citizens argue that officers might be liable for cases filed against them if they use excess force on people that seem suspicious but have not actually committed a crime. On the other hand, the opposing argument in favor of deadly force states that

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

It also extended such authority to persons in loco parentis (i.e. who stand "in the place of parents") such as guardians and school teachers. But in many jurisdictions today it is quiet rare. Self-Defence If a person uses legitimate force to repel an attack either against himself or others or against his property, that is a defence to assault and battery. The action of self-defence must only be such as is appropriate to repel the attack; it must not be excessive.

Read More
1631 Words | 7 Pages

Only in this case I would have the legal right to defend myself with all possible means, as any citizen in this country. I do not have any other serious weapons besides this knife, and that’s quite enough with my mostly analytical work at corporations’ offices. For the same reason I didn’t need this knife for a very long time and now, standing with it at the door, I assumed that I wouldn’t hit any credit card at random at three yards. So now I had to practice and practice for hours to be sure that my knife would hit the target, always and any place, and I could rely on

Read More
936 Words | 4 Pages

Secondly, people’s physical endurance is not adequate to sustain a successful defense. Thirdly, being attacked requires a mental response, as does dealing with the shock from immediate danger. This response is a person’s

Read More
1174 Words | 5 Pages

Imagine you're walking home late at night by yourself. Out of nowhere, someone jumps out at you holding a knife. You have two options, run or fight. Running will cost you your life if they catch you. Stand Your Ground is a law that protects you if you decide to defend yourself in that situation.

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

Self-defence is an act of defending yourself or others against means of harm or in the action of crime prevention. As defined under Section 3 of the Criminal Law Act 1967 it states that ‘a person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime. Self-defence is also mentioned in the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. The CJIA Section 76(1) provides that ‘in deciding whether the force used is reasonable, considerations must be taken into account so far as relevant in the circumstances of the case’. Self-defence is split into two sections, private defence and public defence.

Read More

More about Invisible Enemy Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document