In this paper, I will discuss a scenario of an alien civilization coming to earth in peace but, offers all humanity a cure for all diseases especially cancer in exchange of 10,000 involuntary human subjects for their own possibly lethal experiments on whether it is right or wrong. There are three different individuals which are an Ethic Relativist, Rule Utilitarian, and Act Utilitarian who haves their own opinion when it comes to this scenario and whether it is morally correct to exchange 10,000 human beings against their will for a cure of all human diseases in the world. Through the controversy of a relativist determining that there no morals values for any cultures that have their own rules and not intervene with other cultures and a utilitarian deciding on whether …show more content…
If one of the cultures do not believe that sacrificing innocent individuals lives for the greater good shows that they believe the exchange can be incorrect if one was to exchange a person for a cure or money. If another culture believes that it is an accurate moral to exchange human beings for a cure that cures all diseases than they believe it is most accurate since a relativist believes that no one should intervene with a culture that they are not contribute to they will have to focus on their own and believe their own thoughts. In this context, it does seem like a relativist would evaluate this exchange on whether the belief of the culture is primary insight of what their rules are. The moral evaluation does not change whether it is an act or rule utilitarianism, because it does create a consequence that affects the society. If the rule utilitarianism was being applied, it would have a made a difference because it affects the morals in our society especially when it comes to “possibly” lethal experiments on human beings it causes a greater effect on the