ipl-logo

Is Death Penalty Equal To Unfair?

856 Words4 Pages

2.0 Body
2.1 Argument 1: Death Penalty is Equal to Unfairness
Death penalty, or known as Capital Punishment, is the most severe form of punishment of all legal sentence. However, is death penalty fair or just?
Many people frequently debate over the fairness of the death penalty. According to the general agreement that not all severe cases or capital crimes are equally odious. Not all capital crimes deserve death. The sentence should be tailored to the offense done by an individual (Novak, 2013).
Humans always make mistakes. Judges and Juries are human and that does not mean that they will not make mistake while they make their judgement on an offender. Dhillon, Mohammad and Ng (2012) state that although most of the capital crimes require sensible evidence before a person is sentence to death, it does not guarantee that no mistakes when a conviction is make. The study of Columbia University Law School concluded that 2/3 of all death sentence have errors. This circumstance might happen on an innocent people, which shows that death …show more content…

One of the reason to retain capital punishment is the death sentence can be used as a retribution for the death that was caused. This reflects a natural concern of society. According to Dhillon, Mohammad and Ng (2012), it is known that the victim’s family and friend have a very great detestation to the murderer. They would certainly hope that the murderer will get executed under the enforcement of death penalty in return for the life taken. Richard and Devine (2003) state that the death penalty is a necessary and appropriate punishment to the murderer. Many people feel that capital punishment is retribution for crimes. Most of the people agree that punishment should be done for murder. Treating death penalty or capital punishment as though it is ‘eye for an eye’, ‘blood for blood’ or ‘murder for murder’ (Dhillon, Mohammad and Ng,

Show More
Related
856 Words | 4 Pages

Gideon v. Wainwright( 1963, 9-0 Vote Decision) Facts of the Case/Question Clarence Earl Gideon was charged in Florida state court with a felony because he broke into and entered a poolroom with the intent to commit a misdemeanor offense. When he appeared in court, Gideon requested that the court appoint a lawyer for him because he did not have one. However, according to Florida state law, an attorney may only be appointed to a needy defendant in capital cases, so the court did not appoint one. Gideon represented himself at the trial. He was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison.

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

The death penalty on the other hand would have been effective if the overall public minded to consider it a system for ending criminal acts. While a monstrous number would ensure the nonattendance of the death penalty in their real system, the wrongdoing rate continues going higher for countries that still practice the death penalty. Regardless, there is lacking accurate data to exhibit that death penalty has been convincing similarly as maintaining a strategic distance from criminal acts. It infers

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with two separate arguments about the death penalty in his academic book The Ethical Life, fundamental readings in ethics and moral problems. In the first argument, Justifying Legal Punishment, Igor Primoratz gives us substantive reasoning that opts favorably toward the necessity of the death penalty. Contrasting Primoratz, Stephen Nathanson, through An Eye for an Eye, provides us with an argument that hopes to show us that capital punishment, like murder, is also immoral and therefore, unjust. By the end of this essay, I intend to show that while capital punishment may not be the easy choice for a consequence and punishment to murder, it is, however, the necessary one.

Read More
302 Words | 2 Pages

In All Quiet on the Western front, we are brought to the narrator of this reading, Paul Baumer. Paul Baumer is known as a protagonist someone who is compassionate and sensitive for a 19 year old young man who is battling in the war. Paul Baumer shows himself being compassionate towards his comrades in many different scenarios. For starters when Kemmerich is in the hospital and he is injured Paul goes with him and is trying to help him stay calm in his situation. Kemmerich is concerned that he is going to die so he won't make it back home and Paul continues to tell him not to “talk rubbish; Franz, in a couple of days you’ll see for yourself.

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

Support for capital punishment requires valuing retribution over rehabilitation. Those who favor capital punishment value highly the closure it provides to the families of the victims, and they believe that it deters would be murderers from killing. Retribution, closure and deterrence are the main reasons in favor of the death penalty. Opponents of capital punishment generally believe that it is hypocritical and immoral for the state

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

Death Penalty is a very ominous punishment to discuss. It is probably the most controversial and feared form of punishment in the United States. Many are unaware, but 31 of the 52 states have the Death penalty passes as an acceptable punishment. In the following essay, I will agree and support Stephen Nathanson's statement that "Equality retributivism cannot justify the death penalty. " In the reading, "An Eye for an Eye?", Nathanson gives objections to why equality retributivism is morally acceptable for the death penalty to be legal.

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

In recent years, anti-death penalty propagandists have succeeded in stoking the fear that capital punishment is being carelessly meted out. Ironically, Of the 875 prisoners executed in the United States in modern times, not one has been retroactively proved innocent. The benefits of a legal system in which judges and juries have the option of sentencing the cruelest or coldest murderers to death far outweigh the potential risk of executing an innocent person. First and foremost, the death penalty makes it possible for justice to be done to those who commit the worst of all crimes. The execution of a murderer sends a powerful moral message: that the innocent life he took was so precious, and the crime he committed so horrific, that he forfeits

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

This article discusses individual cases and crimes and gives analysis of the arguments made against death penalty in real world. Firstly it discusses the deterrence argument while going through a number of cases. The conclusion is that it has no effect on reducing homicides but ironically it breeds violence as in some cases offenders committed a capital crime in a territory where execution still prevails while they could have easily avoided it. Second thing discussed is the cost, the research in article shows that it costs significantly more money to put a convict to death than to incarcerate him for life in a prison. Moreover it is shown that in many cases criminals are executed while there are reasonable doubts in their convictions and some have avoided execution by just a few hours before being exonerated.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

Even though it is true that taking the life of another is not right, it is even truer that the punishment should fit the crime. The death penalty is an exercise of justice that promotes retribution for crime and moral punishment for those who choose to take human life. Also, it prevents society 's worse offenders from re-offending, and it provides justice for the victims whose lives were cut short without a second thought. To better understand why capital punishment is a justifiable act, Kant 's theory gives a clear and logical understanding of the eye for an eye approach. Additionally the utilitarian view also explains why capital punishment is justifiable in regards to comfort for the victim 's family and prevention of re-offending.

Read More
1180 Words | 5 Pages

Racism Trough Discourse Analysis Analyzing racism and gender discrimination in a white/black society discourse and its' reproduction in white elite culture. Based on educational researchers that consider racism discrimination directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior in characteristics, abilities and qualities. As defining discourse concept that spoken is written communications that provides a big supporting filed of racism application, beside the structure of text on minorities of words, mental, socio-cultural , politics, effects or function. The discrimination defines the unjust treatment of different categories of people through races, ages, sex, etc... . In addition, white elite is

Read More
1723 Words | 7 Pages

Different philosophers have related to the subject of the death penalty have interpreted the great thinkers and schools of philosophy differently. Some philosophers might like Kant to be in favor of capital punishment and others might argue against. . It is clear that this criminal regarding the gravity of the act must give his life to pay for what he has done. Michael Woodmansee who killed a 5 years old boy is going to get out of jail after 28 years and not 40 as planned. The boy’s father John Foreman as already express his feeling to kill this man (New-York Times, 2011).

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Why death penalty must end ‘’An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind,’’ said Mahatma Gandhi. The execution of someone who has possibly done a crime is an inhuman act. Death penalty is hypocritical and flawed. If killing is wrong, why do we kill when a criminal has done the crime of killing someone? In this essay, I will write why death penalty should end by writing about the violation of human rights, execution of innocent people, the fact that it does not deter crime and money.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Each year in many countries around the world people are murdered in the name of “justice”. But can justice really include a sanitised form of revenge? Many people are for the death penalty regardless of what it actually is. A major way that the death penalty is flawed is shown in the amount of innocent people who are sentenced to death.

Read More
1267 Words | 6 Pages

The Death Penalty, loss of life due to previous crimes and actions, is believed by some to be extremely costly, inhumane, and cruel unlike some others whom believe it is just, right, and provides closure. The Death Penalty is not a quick and easy process. Most who get sentenced to deaths row wait years for their ultimate punishment of death. Some believe that it is not right to punish and kill a human for actions they have done because, they believe that the inmate should have another chance. Then others believe that it is right to punish someone for their actions especially if their actions involve killing another or multiple humans.

Read More

More about Is Death Penalty Equal To Unfair?

Related Topics

Open Document