ipl-logo

Is Elie Wiesel's Speech Analysis: The Perils Of Indifference

1065 Words5 Pages

Henry Hultberg
Mr. Bolton
CIHS Public Speaking
7 March, 2023
Great Speech Analysis: The Perils of Indifference Elie Wiesel, in his persuasive speech, “The Perils of Indifference”(1999) emphasizes the dangers of apathy and indifference and that people should not look away from the pain and suffering that people go through. Wiesel develops and supports his thesis with his use of imagery, repetition, and rhetorical questions(vocabulary. com). Wiesel’s purpose is to persuade the audience that people should not turn away from human suffering and ignore it. Wiesel is addressing the White House, as he emphasizes in a formal tone that being indifferent to other people's suffering only increases the suffering that people face. Elie Wiesel was born …show more content…

as part of the Millennium Evenings, a series of speeches and lectures hosted by then President of the United States, Bill Clinton and First Lady, Hillary Clinton. These speeches had a focus on the end of the twentieth century and into the twenty-first century. Wiesel’s speech has a theme of looking back at what happened in the previous century as well as the emphasis on how we should not forget about what happened in the twentieth century and avoiding indifference in the new millennium. Wiesel, having lived through the Holocaust, in some of the most brutal concentration camps to have been used by the Nazi regime, had experienced the apathy of world leaders as the jews in Auschwitz and Buchenwald were …show more content…

Anger can at times be creative. One writes a great poem, a great symphony. One does something special for the sake of humanity because one is angry at the injustice that one witnesses. But indifference is never creative. Even hatred at times may elicit a response. You fight it. You denounce it. You disarm it.
Indifference elicits no response. Indifference is not a response. Indifference is not a beginning; it is an end. And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor -- never his victim”
Wiesel also repeats other words throughout his speech as in a previous part of his speech, he repeats the word “God” as he talks about how it is always worse for someone to be ignored by God than to be punished by God. Wiesel uses repetition to complement his use of allusion and imagery.
The last of the main rhetorical devices that Wiesel uses is rhetorical questions. Wiesel uses rhetorical questions to build upon his thesis about indifference. Rhetorical questions can often make an audience think and question what happens in life as it is, which can play a large part in

Show More
Related
242 Words | 1 Pages

Wiesel introduces his first claim by asking the audience about their perspective of the word Indifference and gives it definition and his own to then again question his audience about its effects. The reason for this structure was to get to audience to really think about what he is asking to provide their own perspective of Indifference and to see if their answer is like his own. He repeats the first letter of every word to emphasize the contrast between those who are indifferent and those who are not (which is his answer). He therefore backs up his answer by providing another one of his personal experience about what happened behind the gates of Auschwitz and the people. As he grows more towards the topic of indifference, he takes the time

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

American Jewish writer, and political activist Elie Wiesel, in his sympathetic speech “The Perils of Indifference” to send a strong message to the audience. As a survivor of the Holocaust, he supports his claim through his speech explaining the dangers of indifference from first hand experience. Specifically in his speech he refers to himself, “A young Jewish boy [..] woke up in a place of eternal infamy called Buchenwald”(par 1).. In addition, Wiesel use of rhetorical questions is for the audience to question or to think about indifference. Wiesel’s purpose is to warn people about indifference in order to “save” our future.

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

Holocaust survivor and author of the novel, Night, Elie Wiesel in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” claims that indifference is not only a sin, but is an act of dehumanization. He begins to develop his claim by defining the word indifference, then enlightens the audience about his personal experiences living through the war, and finally asks the audience how they will change as they enter a new millennium. Wiesel’s purpose throughout his speech is to convince his audience not to be indifferent to those who were and are being treated cruelly and unjustly. He creates tones of guardedness , disappointment, abandonment, and hopefulness in order for his audience to see his perspective during the horrific times of the war.

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

Elie wiesel once said, “ A strange and unnatural state in which the lines blur between light and darkness”. Elie Wiesel is a holocaust survivor. He gave a wonderful speech called “ The perils of indifference”. He delivered this speech at the white house in washington D.C hoping to encourage the audience to learn from the past. Elie wiesel builds an argument to persuade the people of the new generation that we can all learn and grow to be better in the new millennium.

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout Wiesel’s writings, his indifference towards God, death, and himself are shown within the pages of “Night” and the words from “Perils of Indifference”. In both of Wiesel’s writings, his faith is discussed and dissected in many different ways. At the

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

When the young boy asks, “Who would allow such crimes to be committed? How could the world remain silent”, (paragraph 5) again the audience is prompted to emotionally respond. They have to realize that it was all of them, all of us, who remained silent and that this silence must never happen again. Wiesel demonstrates a strong use of pathos throughout his speech to encourage his audience to commit to never sitting silently by while any human beings are being treated

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

In Elie Wiesel’s speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” Wiesel uses a variety of devices to convey the powerful feeling of how immoral the circumstances of the Holocaust were. He expresses how ignoring the suffering of others only leads to worse outcomes, the dangers of acting with “no difference.” It is worse than to act with hatred. His argument leads with sharing his experience with being at a concentration camp himself as a young boy (1). The horrors that no one could possibly imagine.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

American Jewish writer, professor, political activist, and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel speaks with passion and truth in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference” (April 12, 1999), argues that indifference is the worst trait a person can conceive due to its intolerable traits as well as telling America of its mistakes during World War II. He supports his claim by first thanking his audience for rescuing him in the concentration camps and allowing him into this country, then teaches his audience the true meaning of indifference, then confronts the U.S. government in a calm manner for their mistakes during the war, and finally finishes his speech with refreshing the idea of indifference and why it is so important. Wiesel’s purpose is to identify

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

Indifference need to be gain awareness and be stopped. He develops his claim by narrating the dangers of indifference, and how it affected his life then, describes how wrongful it is to be treated in such a way. Finally Wiesel illustrates examples of how indifference affected the world. Wiesel’s purpose is to inform us about the dangers of indifference in order to bring change about it. He establishes a straightforward tone for the president, ambassadors, politicians, and congressmen.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

But indifference is never creative. Even hatred at times may elicit a response. You fight it. You denounce it. You disarm it.”.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

Indifference is a lack of interest, concern, or sympathy; to be indifferent is to not care about the struggles of anyone but yourself. Most times, indifference is portrayed as a bad thing that does nothing good to anyone. In the CommonLit article “Elie Wiesel’s ‘The Perils of Indifference’ speech” Elie Wiesel, describes some thoughts that he has on indifference and its effect on history. Elie Wiesel agrees that indifference is a bad thing that should be addressed because it always benefits the aggressor and never the victim, it reduces others to an abstraction, and it’s what makes humans inhuman. First and foremost, the aggressor is like a school bully.

Read More
855 Words | 4 Pages

In the speech, titled “The Perils of Indifference,” Elie Wiesel showed gratitude to the American people, President Clinton, and Mrs. Hillary Clinton for the help they brought and apprised the audience about the violent consequences and human suffering due to indifference against humanity (Wiesel). This speech was persuasive. It was also effective because it conveyed to the audience the understanding of

Read More
552 Words | 3 Pages

Elie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech Analysis Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and winner of a Nobel peace prize, stood up on April 12, 1999 at the White House to give his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”. In Wiesel’s speech he was addressing to the nation, the audience only consisted of President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, congress, and other officials. The speech he gave was an eye-opener to the world in his perspective. Wiesel uses a variety of rhetorical strategies and devices to bring lots of emotion and to educate the indifference people have towards the holocaust. “You fight it.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

Paradox, parallelism, personification, repetition, rhetorical question, pathos. You may ask yourself: what importance do these words have? These words are rhetorical devices used to develop a claim. A person who used these important devices was Elie Wiesel. In his 1986 Nobel Peace Acceptance Speech, Elie Wiesel develops the claim that remaining silent on human sufferings makes us just as guilty as those who inflicted the suffering and remain guilty for not keeping the memory of those humans alive.

Read More

More about Is Elie Wiesel's Speech Analysis: The Perils Of Indifference

Related Topics

Open Document