Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gentrification in urban areas
Gentrification
Gentrification in urban areas
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Gentrification is the process of improving a struggling neighborhood for affluent people. One of the main causes of this shown by Kelefa Sanneh’s article “Is Gentrification Really a Problem?” , is the real estate market. Things that affect the value of something in a certain neighborhood can end up having a direct influence in all of the neighborhood and can lead to gentrification. The construction of a luxury apartment building can attract more businesses and in turn, more high-quality living spaces which could eventually displace someone living three blocks away.
While the longtime resident's half see it as something that can be good with the old rundown houses being fixed up, reduction in crime, increasing property value and new shops popping up, they also fear the worse. From the policymaker's perspective gentrification also has several positives. It can reduce vacancies as those abandoned and rundown homes get bought and fixed up, declining neighborhoods become stabilized and diverse and all with no government involvement. While gentrification is neither all negative nor all positive, the negatives for the most vulnerable are those with the worst fear, the fear of being pushed out of their homes, the residents.
My personal experience as someone who was an underclass resident allows me to believe in the investment of people and their ability to recover if opportunities for upward mobility present themselves. Collectively, our society must stop the demonizing of economically depressed areas and their residents especially if the reason behind the destruction is the same system that affords others opportunities for advancement while marginalizing others. Rapper and revolutionary Tupac Shakur said it best, “I didn’t create thug life; I diagnosed it,” so until our society at large understands this, neighborhoods and the social ills that exist within them like NKO will remain as a cancerous growth that America must
There has to be a realistic solution that can be put into motion to benefit everyone involved. Referring again to his article “Is Gentrification All Bad?” Davidson argues that urban renewal, if done right, is not a monstrous custom that it is painted to be; nevertheless, he reasons that gentrification depends on who does it, how they do it, and why they do it. As a resident in New York, a city where gentrification is as widespread as the common cold in winter, Davidson speculates that those who go into a neighborhood with the intention to renovate houses, or abandoned buildings ought to have a good reason for it. The author points out that “Gentrification does not have to be something that one group inflicts on another…” (Davidson 349), rather, he suggests that everyone, the gentrifiers and the locals, be on the same page when it comes to developing their
example, love having more people with disposable income around. Crime tends to decline in gentrified neighborhoods. Local politicians are thrilled with increased tax bases. Neighborhood watch groups trumpet “cleaning up” the neighborhood. But more than anyone, gentrification directly benefits homeowners”(Hern, 19-20).
Gentrification is term to describe the arrival of wealthier individuals who seek in renovating and improvising a certain area. Gentrification is a very common issue and is becoming very controversial in the political world and urban planning. Gentrification usually begins when there is an increased interest in a certain environment or neighborhood by people with higher incomes and social statuses. Gentrification is characterized by many things which also lead to its myths. One myth of gentrification begins with the term ‘ghetto’.
REFERENCE. Andrews, Rebecca L. A Changing Community: A Study of the Impacts of Gentrification and the Possibilities for Equitable Development in Seattle’s Central District. Diss. University of Washington, 2003.
Many proponents as well as advocates of gentrification like to use in many regard as code words to back up their claim that gentrification brings “revitalization” “urban renewal” and more importantly “enhances” the community. However, these are what many who are critical of gentrification deem to be “ code words”, because they appear to be ones that exude positivity when they are in fact not expressing the full story of the argument, because underneath this creeping positivity. There still exists this form of stereotyping that minorities, or those from lower socioeconomic means cannot create something that is unique or successful on their own. Furthermore, what existed in their communities before gentrification was one that brought little to no value to society.
What does Gentrification mean? Gentrification is a transformation process that typically occurs in urban neiborhoods or areas. When Higher-income people move in and displace Lower-income existing residents to make places look modern. This is important because it effects Lower-income people because they get sent, forced, or just move out to a poor place, but gentrification has been associated with some positive, such as urban revitalization and lower crime rates, critics charge that it marginalizes racial and ethnic minorities and destroys the character of urban neiborhoods. My Thesis is that Gentrification should be done but Higher-income people shouldn’t replace Lower-income people just because they don’t have the money to make their places more modern, I know modern is better but we should be fair with everything.
It defines gentrification as the influx of middle class white residents into cities with large minority populations. This situation is reversing a decade old trend where whites were moving out of urban schools. Local officials are in support of gentrification because it provides an opportunity to racially integrate urban schools. The article suggests that some officials are implementing certain policies with the purpose of making the schools more attractive to gentrifies. It argues that such reforms harm poor and minority
[This process] clearly isn’t racist, it’s economic. The real question you have to ask yourself is: Is this good or bad?” said the former Seattle mayor Norm Rice, the city’s only African American to hold that position. Unlike the redlining and white flight of the previous generation, gentrification is fueled not by racism but the market force of supply and demand with consumer preference shifts. One of the prevailing economic theory advocates for changing the zoning low in favor of the construction of new housing development.
Over the years there has been numerous tragedies that have affected countless regions in the world. Such as rape kidnaping, murder, types of genocide and a plethora of other unimaginable events. As cynical as it may seems, we do have the grace of knowing all these commotions are happening or have happened. Unfortunately, in the 17th century there was no way of letting another piece of the world know what devastations were taking place. Mary Rowlandson, a puritan woman born in 1637, captured by Native Americans during King Philip's War had very limited methods of communicating.
It states that, “Within neighborhoods, a broad range of housing types and price levels can bring people of diverse ages, races, and incomes into daily interaction, strengthening the personal and civic bonds essential to an authentic community” (section 13, page 2). When first reading this quote, he or she reading it would be in agreement that having certain areas that are more affordable would help blend the community. Yet in fact, “The Sprawl Debate” makes a valid point, contrasting what the “New Urbanism” article said, that by dedicating certain buildings and areas of the city for low income people does not allow the community to become more blended because those who are wealthy would never be around the “cheap” area of the city, and the poor people who eventually be drawn out because they would not be able to afford goods since the prices would increase due to the city caring more about catering to the wealthy people. In “The Sprawl Debate”, by Peter Gordon, the document points out that, “New Urbanism” builds an image of community and a rhetoric of place-based civic pride and consciousness for those who do not need it, while abandoning those that do to their ‘underclass’
In this speech, I will begin by explaining what gentrification is along with a short background on the Lincoln Park gentrification, then I will proceed to explain how the families in these areas fought for their homes, and finally I will be discussing the gentrification that is affecting citizens of Chicago today. Body I. Gentrification is the process of renovating an area to meet the standards of a different social class, typically the upper middle class. Throughout this process the price of renting and owning a home increases while family owned businesses become bankrupt. Low-income families are left homeless and without the support of a
Gentrification is the process of renovating and improving a house or district so that it conforms to middle-class taste. Real Estate investors usually take low-income places that they feel have a chance to prosper economically, and turn them into areas that attract the middle and upper class workers. In doing so they feel like the low-income areas will be safer and more appealing, attracting more people to visit and live there. An improvement to a poor district sounds beautiful, but is gentrification as great as it’s sought out to be? Many residents have their doubts about gentrification due to the idea that the costs of their living will go up and they will be driven out of their neighborhoods.