ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: Is Segregation Wrong?

731 Words3 Pages

Have been mistreated for a certain color, race or left out because of it? Well that my friend, is segregation. The issues of segregation is wrong! Segregation has been a problem ever since which the difference of skin color and being a certain type of race. Segregation is wrong because of the following 14th amendment written in the Constitution, people 's UNFAIR rights and the equality. The 14th amendment basically states the equal rights of the U.S citizen and the its protection of the laws. From the 14th amendment itself states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” (source 3). To explain, it addresses to be as a U.S citizen. This supports the claim because what race or color you are, you still a U.S citizen and should be treated right. Another …show more content…

According to the Plessy vs. Ferguson article it states,”The state of Louisiana said that mandated segregation did not suggest that blacks were inferior to whites, because the whites-only train cars and the blacks-only train cars were of the same quality. They were equal. Looking at it that way, the segregated-train mandate did not violate the 14th Amendment’s equal protection requirement. The train cars were “separate, but equal,” and therefore it was constitutional. The Supreme Court sided with the state of Louisiana and convicted Plessy.” (source 1). To make a brief statement, this was supposedly “separate, but equal” because they had the same value but just parted away from the other race. But to beg a differ, this wasn 't fair. This wasn’t as constitutional because after the Supreme Court sided with states, the blacks were getting terrible treatment from others and the states themselves. They were giving hand me downs from the whites, there was poorly education taught, and basically harassed because of

Show More
Related
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Notаbly absent from the opinion, as it was in Plessy, is any citаtion to a Supreme Court cаse that considered whether the prаctice of segregating schools was a violation of the Fourteenth Аmendment. It was an open question for the Court. The Court аdmitted that the precedent to which it cited involved discriminаtion between whites and blacks rаther thаn other rаces. However, the Court found no аppreciable difference here—"the decision is within the discretion of the state in regulating its public schools, and does not conflict with the Fourteenth Аmendment."

Read More
440 Words | 2 Pages

The 14th Amendment is the right for those born on American soil to automatically become a citizen. Although there are some who wish to see a revision to the 14th Amendment, citizenship should continue to be based on birth as Chaves states in “The Case for Birthright Citizenship”. The 14th Amendment is seen as outdated by some Americans. The 14th Amendment was created for free slaves.

Read More
1498 Words | 6 Pages

The 14th Amendment elaborates, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” There is a lot this amendment covers and it helps to break it down and look for the main conclusion. It also helps to know the main background to this amendment, and why it was necessary. The overall idea is equality for all citizens of the United States.

Read More
1551 Words | 7 Pages

For nearly a century, the United States was occupied by the racial segregation of black and white people. The constitutionality of this “separation of humans into racial or other ethnic groups in daily life” had not been decided until a deliberate provocation to the law was made. The goal of this test was to have a mulatto, someone of mixed blood, defy the segregated train car law and raise a dispute on the fairness of being categorized as colored or not. This test went down in history as Plessy v. Ferguson, a planned challenge to the law during a period ruled by Jim Crow laws and the idea of “separate but equal” without equality for African Americans. This challenge forced the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of segregation, and in result of the case, caused the nation to have split opinions of support and

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

The explicit meaning of the 14th Amendment is to give Americans equality. In the 14th Amendment it states,” All persons born or naturalized in the United States.” “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States .” No state can make or support any laws that take away the rights of U.S. citizens. To understand the intent and purpose of the 14th Amendment, one must analyze the language

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

On May 18, 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in the Plessy vs. Ferguson law case that separate-but-equal facilities on trains were constitutional.” It is deplorable that such laws were created by Southern Republics to ensure that African Americans would maintain to be treated inferior to them. This includes making segregation a law. Blacks and whites could no longer dine together, sit on the bus together, get an education together,

Read More
1210 Words | 5 Pages

The contents of these laws included the supposed “separate but equal” accommodations of railway cars between the races and attempted to re-authorize the authority of the coaches driving these railway cars by reinstating the ability to assign people spots on railway cars “on account of the race they belong to.” Furthermore, an attempt to justify the enforced segregation bestowed upon the people of Louisiana was made following the words “neither abridges the privileges or immunities of the colored man, deprives him of his property without due process of law, nor denies him the equal protection of the laws, within the meaning of the 14th Amendment.” This statement attempts to use the 14th amendment, which

Read More
319 Words | 2 Pages

The 14th Amendment was ratified to the Constitution on July 9, 1868 and it allowed citizenship to all the people that were born or naturalized in the United States. The 14th Amendment substantially enlarged the safety of civil rights to all American citizens and is mentioned in more legal action than any other amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment involves essential ideas, advantages, exceptions, citizenship, due process, and equivalent protection. All of these involvements are included in Section One, also known as the Naturalization Clause. Before the Fourteenth Amendment was included, people that lived in the states were considered citizens of the United States.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868. It granted citizenship to all persons, born or naturalized in the United States. It forbids states from denying any person "life, liberty, or property, without due process of the law" or to "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." An example of Supreme Court Case involving the Fourteenth Amendment is Plessy v. Ferguson. Homer Adolph Plessy was a successful Louisiana businessman.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

America has been through many trying times, and we’ve somehow found a solution for every problem. Some solutions weren’t always the best but in that moment of time they were ‘good enough’. Slavery solved the labor shortage and created a cheap mass workforce for colonial plantations. Freeing the slaves was an attempt to solve post-civil war problems and stitch the nation back together. ‘Separate but equal’ rulings in courts were trying to smooth over the fact that blacks were not equal.

Read More
867 Words | 4 Pages

The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) The amendments were put into place to protect the rights and civil liberties of all American citizens from the federal government. However, prior to the fourteenth amendment, there was no certainty with the constitution. The constitution did not state in a clear enough way who was protected under it and exactly what rights you had as an American Citizen. The 14th amendment was in response to the just passed thirteenth amendment, which ended slavery in all of the southern states.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

The Fourteenth Amendment has 4 sections that have been in use since the Civil War. The first section is the most important and most discussed. It guarantees citizenship to any and all persons born or naturalized in the United States. It ensures any person 's “life, liberty, or property” will not be denied without due process.” This section defines citizenship, who can become a citizen of the United States and how.

Read More
860 Words | 4 Pages

Segregation has made a huge impact on how human beings of different races and religions are treated. Many historical events have showed how segregation and racism is wrong and selfish. Discrimination has caused many uproars and protests all over the country to protect all races. The three main reasons why segregation is wrong is that it takes away their freedom, makes them feel unequal and treated differently, and finally it is unconstitutional.

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

Many would like to cover their ears and act as though racial justice is a thing of the past. That after the civil rights movement everyone is treated equally. But, we must uncover our ears and address the issue before it gets even more out of hand. I fight for racial justice everyday by beating every stereotype. I push myself to rise above what many think of me and how I will live my life.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

According to Urban Institute, “ racial disparities also permeate the criminal justice system in the united states and undermine its effectiveness”( Sakala, 1). This evidence means that due to bringing up racial topics or are using racial disparities as a defense s an unfair case or act of justice for the colored due to his/her color of skin which means the Americans will have a higher chance to win in a case of justice. Another reason is “ At Urban Institute we examine how historical and ongoing public policies, institutional practices, and cultural narratives perpetuate racial inequalities and constraints mobility for communities of color” ( Sakala,1). This means that in any situation that colored people get in they could have their presence or just the mostly reason that is used which is their skin color to be held accountable for anything and really can’t defend

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: Is Segregation Wrong?

Related Topics

Open Document