ipl-logo

Is The Death Penalty Constitutional Or Unconstitutional

1866 Words8 Pages

Ethan Ju
Mrs. Carlisi
Honors American Government
February 28th, 2017

Is the Death Penalty
Constitutional or Unconstitutional?

Ethan Ju
Mrs. Carlisi
Honors American Government
February 28th, 2017

Q3P1 Since their existence, governments have tried to maintain justice. As time progressed the idea of capital punishment emerged. The death penalty is currently the most severe punishment that can be received. Though it did not originate in America, it has spread to America and has become a controversial topic in America. Many have questioned its constitutionality, and many have brought this issue to the Supreme Court. However, it is obvious that capital punishment in America is unconstitutional. The history of the death penalty throughout …show more content…

Virginia and Roper v. Simmons can be used to show the how the death penalty is unconstitutional in America. The constitutionality of the death penalty has been argued in various court cases. The eighth amendment states that any cruel and unusual punishment is forbidden. The first case to deal with this topic was Gregg v. Georgia. In which the supreme court ruled that the death penalty was not unconstitutional and was not cruel and unusual punishment. From here came the case of Atkins v. Virginia. Daryl Atkins was accused of robbery, murder, and abduction. He was convicted by the Virginia Supreme Court and sentenced to death. However, the case was brought to the Supreme Court, as Atkins was mentally disabled. Thus, the question that is executing someone who is mentally disabled considered cruel and unusual punishment. The Supreme Court went on to rule in a 6-3 favor of Atkins (“Atkins”). After this case came the case of Roper v. Simmons. Christopher was sentenced to death, but was 17 at the time of the sentence. The Missouri Supreme Court ruled in favor of Simmons, using the precedent set in the case of Atkins v. Virginia. From here, Roper, the superintendent of the correctional facility Simmons was assigned to, brought the case to the Supreme Court. Thus the question is executing a minor considered cruel and unusual punishment, was raised. The Court went on to rule in a 5-4 favor of Simmons. The cases of Atkins v. Virginia and Roper v. Simmons …show more content…

The latest Gallup Poll taken on this topic took place from October 5th through October 9th. This poll has revealed that 60 percent of Americans are for the death penalty, 37 percent are opposed to the death penalty, and 3 percent have no preference (Gallup). Though showing that the majority of Americans are for the death penalty, supporters in America and throughout the world have gradually decreased over time. Many court cases have been fought over this topic, and many arguments have been waged. However, the underlying idea of the death penalty remains one that should be focused on. Justice and social structure need to be kept together, but the death penalty is not the correct answer to this, as it jeopardizes

Show More
Related

Case Brief Of Gideon V. Wainwright

856 Words | 4 Pages

He tried to flee, and while doing so tripped and fell. The gun that he carried went off and killed a resident of the home. He was eventually convicted of murder and sentenced to death. The question in this case is, “Is the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty in this case cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments?” Reasons for Majority

Read More

Roper V Distortions Falls Under The 8th Amendment

358 Words | 2 Pages

Roper V Simmions, Falls under the 8th amendment cruel and unusual punishment. In Roper V Simmions there was a 17 year old boy with a mental disabitliy who commited a premediated murder was orginally being tried for the death penalty. In this case however there was another individual who did assist in the murder. He wasnt declared “mentally fit” for the trial but some felt his crimes were heneous enough to warrent the death penalty.

Read More

US 304 Atkins Vs. Virginia (2002)

1099 Words | 5 Pages

536 U.S. 304. Atkins vs. Virginia (2002). Atkins vs. Virginia (2002) was a six to three Supreme Court decision ruling that people determined to be mentally retarded are categorically excluded from capital punishment. They were excluded because executing such offenders would violate the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines impose, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”. Atkins was convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder.

Read More

The Supreme Court Case Of Roper V. Simmons 543 US 551

593 Words | 3 Pages

Simmons 543 U.S. 551 (2005), n.d.). Upon review, the court took into consideration the recent finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Atkins v. Virginia 536 U.S. 304 (2002), where they found it cruel and unusual punishment to execute the mentally challenged. As a result, the Court agreed with Simmons, setting aside the death sentence for that of life in prison without the possibility of release stating “although Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U. S. 361, rejected the proposition that the Constitution bars capital punishment for juvenile offenders younger than 18, a national consensus has developed against the execution of those offenders since Stanford” (Roper v. Simmons 543 U.S. 551 (2005), n.d.). Thus, in overturning the Supreme Court’s ruling the Missouri Supreme Court took the stance that national opinion had changed and based on the passing of numerous laws and the consensus of many Americans, the imposition of the death penalty on minors was

Read More

Ehrlich Anthony Coker Case

755 Words | 4 Pages

Supreme Court has redefined (along with not defining) the Eighth Amendment and “Cruel and Unusual Punishment”. Moreover, the court has intervened in many cases where the death penalty was applied injustice. The Cruel and unusual punishment doctrine has not been well developed. The Supreme Court’s primary concentration has been on the word “cruel” when determining what punishments are prohibited.

Read More

Roper V. Simmons Case

357 Words | 2 Pages

The court case Roper v. Simmons was a case that questioned whether or not the execution of a juvenile violated the Constitution. This case began in 2002 and was appealed and decided in 2005. This was a Missouri case that involved Christopher Simmons, who at the time was only seventeen years old. As a punishment for a crime that he committed, Simmons was given the death penalty. Simmons tried many times to appeal his case and avoid being executed.

Read More

Gregg Vs Georgia Case Study

1054 Words | 5 Pages

In the the Supreme Court case Gregg Vs. Georgia, Justice Stewart concluded that “We now hold that the punishment of death does not invariably violate the Constitution.” (GREGG v. GEORGIA, 1976), answering the question of whether or not capital punishment is ever unconstitutional. Some may argue that Stewart is saying that the death penalty is sometimes considered constitutional, however, it is important to note that if we as Americans don’t enforce the constitutional rights of human beings at all times, the foundation of our nation will slowly begin to lose its strength. If in any way something can be declared as unconstitutional, then from there on out it will never fall into the realm of being constitutional.

Read More

Christopher Simmons Supreme Court Case

837 Words | 4 Pages

According to Missouri Supreme Court in 2002, the Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. Virginia (2002) turned the death penalty for the mentally retarded and Missouri Supreme Court reconsidered Simmons' case. The Missouri Supreme Court concluded that, "a national consensus has developed against the execution of juvenile offenders" and sentenced Simmons to life imprisonment without parole. (Atkins v. Virginia, 2002) The State of Missouri appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Roper Vs Hammons

872 Words | 4 Pages

If I were a justice on the Supreme Court, in Roper v. Simmons, I would have voted along with the justice on dissent; however, I do not agree with the execution of juveniles, but life in prison for Christopher Simmons should have never been negotiable. As the presiding justice for the Supreme Court, my decision for Simmons would have been life in prison pending that he goes through a series of evaluations. Every case law in the United States is presided by other case laws. However, in Christopher Simmons’s case, he was seventeen at the time of his confession, in which he bragged about his illustration of the crime; therefore, as justice, I would have taken into account Simmons motivation to commit murder.

Read More

Roper Vs Simmons Research Paper

1427 Words | 6 Pages

Jr., 2017). With this Amendment depriving a juvenile from the possibility of appealing from the death penalty it deprives a person from their life and liberty. In the case of Atkins v. Virginia due to the Eight and Fourteen Amendments the courts did not allow the execution of a person who was mentally disabled. In regards to Simmons case the Supreme Court argue just like in Atkins v. Virginia individuals with mental retardation should also be implemented to juveniles where the death penalty should not be a form of punishment. The Court establishes three criteria that differentiate juveniles from adult and from the high risk offenders.

Read More

Atkins V. Virginia Case Study

997 Words | 4 Pages

Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), after an incident in 1996, the defendant, Daryl Renard Atkins, was convicted of abduction, armed robbery, and capital murder in a Virginia trial court. Then at a second capital sentencing hearing, appellate ruling states that the first hearing was a mislead verdict form, “a testimony from a forensic psychologist stated that Atkins was mildly retarded, with an IQ of 59, a prosecution expert witness expressed that the defendant was of at least average intelligence, a jury again sentenced him to death” (Atkins v. Virginia, 2002). The case document of Atkins v. Virginia (2002) states that in an appeal to the supreme court of Virginia, “affirming the imposition of the death penalty relied on the authority of Penry v. Lynaugh (1989), which had to do with the eighth amendment protecting individuals from cruel and unusual punishment, however the case rejected the defendant’s claim as there was no categories that prohibited death sentences on those who were mentally handicapped” ( Atkins v. Virginia, 2002). Then on a certiorari, the US supreme court reversed and remanded the sentence, holding that execution of offenders who were mentally handicapped was excessive and thus was prohibited by the eighth amendment, therefore, it was decided on June 20th, 2002 that “execution of criminals that were ‘mentally retarded’ are held as cruel and unusual punishment and in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the constitution” (Atkins

Read More

Does The Death Penalty Violate The 8th Amendment

405 Words | 2 Pages

Does the death penalty violate the 8th Amendment? According to the National Constitution Center, the 8th Amendment states “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (“Amendment VIII”). There is no objective answer to this, because the courts never clearly stated that the death penalty is cruel and unusual. I do not agree with any part of the death penalty simply because I believe it is cruel in the sense that it strips man of his “right to life” as declared in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Read More

Rough Draft On Capital Punishment

344 Words | 2 Pages

Rough Draft Is the death penalty an effective and justified punishment? This is a topic many Americans have discussed for a long time, and has caused much controversy. Both sides have their pros and cons, and they will be discussed. The first point that many people have about capital punishment is that it’s unconstitutional.

Read More

Capital Punishment Dbq

1068 Words | 5 Pages

Capital punishment, or better known as the death penalty, had made its first appearance with the Babylonians through “the Code of Hammurabi”, the first written set of laws and punishments in history. It has since spread worldwide and evolved to fit the customs and traditions of numerous civilizations as time progressed, which explains why some states in America today have implemented some form of Capital Punishment. Used only for the most vile offenses, Capital Punishment may seem appropriate for those who have done the unthinkable. However, it is unclear where we draw the line between whether or not one should be submitted to the death penalty based on the magnitude of the offense. The Supreme Court’s decision in Atkins v. Virginia had helped

Read More

Write An Essay On The 8th Amendment

471 Words | 2 Pages

It wasn’t until 1972 that the dealt penalty was ever challenged by the Supreme Court. Even then, states were only warned that capital punishment should be done in a consistent and fair way (Bonta & Gendreau, 1990). The rights of anyone accused of committing a crime is protected by the Constitution. As an example, Article I of the Constitution establishes the right of an injection of habeas corpus – an order that demands a judge to assess if there would be sufficient cause to keep an individual in jail.

Read More

More about Is The Death Penalty Constitutional Or Unconstitutional

Related Topics

Open Document