More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychological theory criminal behavior
Psychological theory criminal behavior
Psychological theory criminal behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Roper v. Simmons After reviewing several different opinions regarding the Supreme Court’s verdict in the Roper v. Simmons case, I agree with their final decision. There are many pros and cons when it comes to condemning a juvenile to death row or life imprisonment without parole. I believe that each case is unique and the penalty should depend upon the severity of the crime and how it was committed. In addition, an individual’s age, mental health status and genetics need to be considered when sentencing an appropriate punishment. In Simmons case, I think that he knew exactly what he was doing at the time when he murdered Mrs. Cook.
Kaylee Woolery Mr. O’Rourke Political Issues Tuesday, April 18th Supreme Court Opinion In 1989 the case of Roper vs. Simmons, the US Supreme Court opposed the death sentence and decided against the death penalty for anyone younger than 18. They argued that his 8th amendment rights were being infringed resulting in cruel and unusual punishment for the execution of a minor. Christopher Simmons, a 17-year-old, was arrested and put on trial for the first-degree murder of Shirley Crook. Due to the fact that it was first-degree murder, he was sentenced to death.
There is no other way to put it. It doesn’t matter what you hear from the defence today, and you will hear a great many things. All that matters is that the defendant in this trial killed someone, and it
The issue in this case is whether the imposition of the sentence of death for the crime of murder under the law of Georgia violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Gregg argued that the sentencing procedure allows for arbitrary grants of mercy that reflects a misinterpretation and ignores the reviewing authority of the Georgia Supreme Court to determine whether each death sentence is proportional to other sentencing for similar crimes. Gregg was pleading for a life sentence instead of death. Georgia argued that the statute did not constitute a cruel and unusual punishment and did not violate the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments. Georgia also argued and proved that there must be specific jury findings as to the circumstances of the crime to determine whether the death sentence was fair for the case.
The question then asked before the justices was whether or not capital punishment for the crime of rape was “cruel and unusual punishment” under the Eighth Amendment. The Court found that the death penalty was not invariably cruel and unusual punishment when referencing the Eighth Amendment. However, in the case of Coker v. Georgia the Court did find that the sentence of death was grossly disproportionate and is an excessive punishment for the crime; therefore, it is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment as cruel and unusual punishment (Brody & Acker, 2010, p. 55). At the time of the case in question, the majority of States had ever authorized the use of death for the offense of rape (Brody & Acker, 2010, p. 55). In the case of Furman v. George, under that ruling most of the capital punishment statues in the United States had become invalidated, including rape
In Roper v. Simmons there are two issues that must be addressed, the first being the issue of moral maturity and culpability. The defense in the trial phase of this case argued that Mr. Simmons was an at an age where he was not responsible enough to fully understand the effects and consequences of his actions. The majority draws on Atkins v. Virginia to argue that this specific precedent supports their case that the death penalty should not be imposed on the mentally immature or impaired. However, an important point to be made is that the Atkins v. Virginia decision is geared towards the clinical definition of mental retardation: significant limitations that limit adaptive skills. Also, another important question to consider is the competency and premeditation of Mr. Simmons’ crime in this case.
The interpretation of the Eighth Amendment has been changed throughout history in terms of who receives the death penalty, why it is applied, and how it is carried out. In the case, Atkins v. Virginia, Daryl Atkins was sentenced to death, but later was found to have a mental deficiency. When taken to a higher court, the defendant used the case Penry v Lynaugh as a precedent which contributed to the final 6-3 decision favoring Atkins. This illustrates that any person that commits a crime that is usually ruled as a death sentence, but has a mental deficiency, cannot be sentenced to death.
It’s Not working out. By:Taija Jones. The 8th amendment says “Excessive bail shall not be required, Nor excessive fines imposed, Nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” . With that being said if the 8th amendment applies for cruel punishments of death penalties then why is it still happening.
The fact that the Supreme Court initially rejected the challenge in one case and then later reconsidered it in another case makes the issue complex. Finally, the evidence highlights a significant moment in the history of the United States Supreme Court's stance on the constitutionality of the death penalty. It shows how the Court has evolved in interpreting the Eighth Amendment's cruel and unusual punishments clause and this evolution has led to the abolition of the death penalty in some states and more
But it really doesn’t make sense because when they convicted him they didn’t bother interviewing anyone how could a 14 year old boy that weight 90 pounds be able to kill and carry the two girls . Picked George Stinney
The case was quite controversial as there was blatant evidence that his actions were premeditated , yet he was still a minor. However, the unique circumstances of his upbringing could have acted
The 8th Amendment states this; Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted (U.S. Const. Amend. VIII). Out of 8,776 executions from 1890 to 2010 276 executions were botched, or carried out badly or carelessly, a percentage of 3.15% of the time. This severly violates the 8th Amendment.
The question of whether death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishments and thereby violates the provisions contained in the Eighth Amendment is talked about a lot. The purpose of the death penalty is deterrence of heinous crimes. ... Hence when the perpetrator of a heinous crime is put to death by the State, there is a sense of 'justice' being done and that the survivors can get
Specifically, it is argued that this punishment violates the Eighth amendment under cruel and unusual punishment. Over time concerns arose about how some states handled the death penalty, however a number of states addressed this and The Supreme Court approved their revisions (“Introduction to Death Penalty” 1). In approving revised laws and procedures, The Supreme Court Stated, “the death penalty itself was constitutional under the Eighth Amendment” (“Introduction to Death Penalty” 1). Many crimes are not punishable by the death penalty simply because the victim may not have died. In order for one to receive the death penalty, the victim must have died.
