I do not agree with one or the other. There are certain parts of both essay that I agree with. While the idea of an Ivy League college is sound, its actuality is far from its intention. William Deresiewicz states, “Elite schools like to boast that they teach their students how to think, but all they mean is that they train them in the analytic and rhetorical skills that are necessary for success in business and the professions.” These schools are designed to prepare students for higher level jobs outside of school. Students at Ivy League schools do not learn to be creative and to think in a way that differs from the standard. Ivy Leagues are similar to standardized tests. Both examine the accepted archetype such as math, science, and reading comprehension. Neither of these scrutinize the more artistic side of the mind. An art student or a musician is just as talented as though who excel at standardized tests; it’s just a different form of intelligence. …show more content…
J.D. Chapman reveals, “They are also unanimous on this point: they are proud of their educations, but do not conclude from that pride that an Ivy League education is “overrated” in comparison.” An Ivy League college is similar to an Honors college. It provides a learning environment for the most scholarly advanced students to learn and grow with other students just like them. This can be beneficial in a few ways. Students and teachers can move at a faster pace in class and have intelligent and constructive class discussions. With a wide range of brilliant students that come from a variety of backgrounds, the conversion will hear many different types of perceptive on