Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A brief introduction of the call of the wild
A brief introduction of the call of the wild
The call of the Wild:Analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A brief introduction of the call of the wild
John Krakauer wrote the book Into the Wild about Christopher McCandless, who takes a wild journey. This book tells of his crazy adventures of him being in the wild. This book contains personal information on what might have led McCandless to go on his own and live the lifestyle that he lived. Chris is a figure both admired and criticized in the years following his death. Some believe McCandless to be a noble, determined, brave, and extraordinary adventurer worthy of admiration for living his life to the fullest.
Man and nature has always had an imbalanced relationship. Since the dawn of mankind, humans depended on the unpredictable being that is nature in order to survive. Gradually, however, the environment has been manipulated by people, to fit their needs for survival and personal satisfaction. Presently, the relationship between man and nature has been drifting further apart with a growing disconnection between the two, as shown in Richard Louv’s Last Child in the Woods.
“Into the Wild,” contains the story of Christopher Johnson McCandless, an adventurous young man who perished in the Alaskan brush. His story has captured the imaginations of people across the world, perhaps none more so than that of his biographer, Jon Krakauer. Krakauer sees McCandless as an adventurous, possibly brilliant young man who left civilization in search of the greater meaning of life. In the author 's note Krakauer makes it clear that he won 't be an “impartial biographer,” the story is too personal. The similarities between Krakauer and McCandless are difficult to ignore.
Christopher McCandless, a foolish, narcissistic young man confidently ventured into the Alaskan wilderness unprepared and paid for it with his life. At least that’s what some people believe about him, but McCandless was more than just a foolish kid. McCandless was a courageous young man that dropped the luxurious lifestyle given to him to follow his heart and live naturally in harmony with nature. McCandless was the embodiment of great philosophers’ ideas such as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, he was morally driven and had dreams that nothing was going to stop him from reaching, and in many people’s eyes, that made him completely unworthy of the injudicious, woefully naive title he was given by hundreds of critics. Christopher McCandless, the central figure in Jon Krakauer’s novel, Into The Wild, was an ambitious man that developed
The allure of danger and extreme risky activities is central to nature. Christopher McCandless, the main character of Into the Wild, written by Jon Krakauer, isolated himself from society to live in the wild to achieve his dream to be one with nature. However, McCandless died in an abandoned bus on the Stampede Trail, Alaska, USA, from unknown causes. There are people that call him a hero and those that don’t. The novel Into the Wild is about McCandless’s journey and the novel shows his mistakes.
Jack London was probably the most influential to McCandless. His work, The Call of the Wild was about survival, which probably made McCandless want to take himself out into the wild, as he shared
In Jon Krakauer’s fiction narrative, Into the Wild, he portrays Chris McCandless as a self-reliant and thoughtless young man. Unfortunately, he sadly passed after a unprepared journey into the Alaskan wilderness. Through a closer examination on his actions and words it reveals he was a deeply appreciative and misunderstood person. McCandless showed his appreciation of the world with his love for nature.. During his travels he took great joy in the beauty of nature and the idea of living with such a gift.
The struggle of man versus nature long has dwelt on the consciousness of humanity. Is man an equal to his environment? Can the elements be conquered, or only endured? We constantly find ourselves facing these questions along with a myriad of others that cause us to think, where do we fit? These questions, crying for a response, are debated, studied, and portrayed in both Jack London’s “
Traveling with a sack of books, he spends most of his time reading and noting books by Jack London, Leo Tolstoy, and Henry David Thoreau. These authors write about nature and their ideals which greatly influence McCandless. McCandless is a typical
“I need to learn how to be content with simply not knowing, and be at peace with the notion that everything does not need an explanation.” I ran across this quote one day while scrolling through my newsfeed on Facebook and my mind immediately went to Into the Wild. The book takes a considerably different approach on sharing the story of a rebellious and ambitious young man who died in the Alaskan wilderness. Writer Jon Krakauer combines his own thoughts along with the accounts of others to the young adventurers’ letters and journal entries to recount the story of Christopher Johnson McCandless, who referred to himself as Alexander Supertramp. He was raised in Annandale, Virginia by a wealthy family.
He can also direct people in very specific terms because he is so familiar with the area. Because of this he is able to allow some of the men to leave the fort without being caught or killed by the Huron people out in the woods. Nature is his way of getting from place to place. He follows what he sees and remembers what he sees to get to where he needs to go. He uses his skills and love for nature to benefit not only himself but the people around
However there are dangerous things about nature even if humans need nature. The inclusion of nature in the good mind’s creation suggests that humans want a simplistic life in unity with nature, but without the chaos of nature in its purest
Nature and men have always been in conflict. Even though humans are part of Nature, we see ourselves as entities unrelated to it. Since the prehistory, we have been using Nature at our favor mostly to feed ourselves.
Jack London 's writing is harsh poetry. He describes scenes in such detail. Reading his work makes you picture how the scenes look in your head. He shows a deeper meaning in the events of his stories(Napierkowski). The point of view of the story is third person limited omniscient.
The relationship between the human self and nature is strong because: To be happy is not getting satisfaction out of objects. Being happy comes from being outdoors and nature has a healing