Abstract expressionist work remains widely put down by various parts of the public for lacking much of the fundamental roots and base features that other, more realism-focused styles present in a way that is more understandable at first glance. Unfortunately, many only view art as a pretty scene to gaze at or something to always be pleasant to the viewer’s eyes, without regard to intentions and processes that add so much more to any given piece. As times moves forward, there will always be a number of individuals who just don’t care for non objective work due to a lack of willingness to understanding it, even if they really do contain all of these deeper components, and sometimes even a significant degree more when one really takes time to analyze and take in all that each piece has to offer.
Among many who stretch the boundaries and basic ideas of art, Jackson Pollock was one of the few who really acted as a leading force behind the abstract expressionist movement. Pollock, despite beginning from an interest in American art, ended up showing incredible skill in bringing all of the core basic principles oh art together in his modernist and expressive work which he found himself at home creating, and stayed true to this throughout the rest of his career
…show more content…
29, which we will be putting our focus on. Pollock is everything but conventional in his craft, and makes very unique decisions on his materials and process for this particular painting. As a canvas, Pollock chooses a glass pane of all things, giving a very unique dynamic backdrop that can change depending on specific location of installation. Above this, we find several layers of thick oil paint smoothly scattered across the scene, intertwined with various ingredients including pebbles, sand, shells, marbles, and even colored plastic and mesh