Jacquette's Argument

164 Words1 Pages
I support Jacquette’s argument more than French’s argument. I believe French's criticism is flawed in certain points because I believe Jaquette is right that it’s wrong for French to conclude that machines can never successfully answer subcognitive questions. French is being too certain on a subject that is still lacking in terms of research. I believe it’s possible for machines to answer subcognitive questions in a human-like manner with the continuous development and improvement of science and technology. Also, on the criticism for using human intelligence to test, we don’t know what other intelligence are like. Humans might not be able to identify machine intelligence if it’s present since the subject is still an unclear field in science.