Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why reject vegetarianism
Reasons to become vegetarian
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Is eating meat a detrimental threat to the environment? This debate over meat’s involvement in the global warming crisis was what inspired Nicolette Hahn Niman to write, “The Carnivore’s Dilemma.” Niman hoped writing, “The Carnivore’s Dilemma,” would cause her audience to understand that eating meat, raised on traditional farms, was a superior alternative to vegetarianism. Niman supported her claim by explaining how industrialized farms and vegetarians produce more of the three greenhouse gases that caused global warming, than that produced by traditional farms. Niman’s article fell short of being effective due to flaws in her supporting evidence and conclusion.
Relevance between Food and Humans with Rhetorical Analysis In the modern industrial society, being aware of what the food we eat come from is an essential step of preventing the “national eating disorder”. In Michael Pollan’s Omnivore’s Dilemma, he identifies the humans as omnivores who eat almost everything, which has been developed into a dominant part of mainstream unhealthiness, gradually causing the severe eating disorder consequences among people. Pollan offers his opinion that throughout the process of the natural history of foods, deciding “what should we have for dinner” can stir the anxiety for people based on considering foods’ quality, taste, price, nutrition, and so on.
Saletan gives more than enough information on how, when, and what is happening worldwide about obesity. Although he does not give a solution, he still made an eye opening experience while reading this essay. Obesity is now happening worldwide. Yes I said it, worldwide according to Saletan. “Egyptian, Mexican, and South African women are as fat as American”, he claims in the second paragraph.
Zinczenko’s Rhetorical Precis In his essay “Don’t Blame the Eater,” David Zinczenko sympathizes for port fast-food patron, like himself ages ago, he agrees that food industry should take some responsibility for obesity. He supports his claim by warning consumers about the dangers of fast food,as it play a factor in obesity. Within his argument, he questions other counter arguments and uses his narrative tone to show consumers that the food industry is necessarily at fault. Zincenko believes the prevalence of fast food and the lack of healthier food alternatives is causing obesity in America.
As diets and health become more and more of a public concern in America. Two authors weigh in on their opinions on how the American public should handle the problem of obesity as well as their solutions to the overwhelming issue. In one article, “Against Meat,” published on the New York Times website in 2009, points out that the solution to obesity should be vegetarianism. Johnathan Foer who is a vegetarian, claims that his diet and way of living is his the way of improving health in the American public. Foer’s article provides a sense of humor as well as personal stories to attempt to persuade his audience for the ethical treatment of animals along with his personal solution for his own health and the health of his family.
In both David Zinczenko’s “Don’t Blame The Eater” and “ Radley Balko’s “What You Eat is Your Business”, the argument of obesity in America is present and clear from opposing viewpoints. Both articles were written in the early 2000’s, when the popular political topic of the time was obesity and how it would be dealt by our nation in the future. While Zinczenko argues that unhealthy junk food is an unavoidable cultural factor, Balko presents the thought that the government should have no say in it’s citizens diet or eating habits. Zinczenko’s article was written with the rhetorical stratedgy of pathos in mind.
Experts recommend that adults eat just over half a pound of meat per week to help reduce their risk for diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, and/or strokes. “We don’t eat animal products for sufficient nutrition, we eat them to have an odd form of malnutrition, and It’s killing us” (Bittman). There’s a simple way to reduce not only our calorie intake, but our carbon footprint as well: “less meat, less junk food, more plants” (Bittman). While Bittman makes some very compelling points about how much of the meat we produce and subsequently waste, he fails to take into account the affordability of meat because of it’s mass production, as well as the simple facts that most people lack the time needed to produce meals with fruits and
According to Mr. Swinton, obesity is the new world’s problem, not the malnutrition. He said “though three quarters of the overcrowded world are starving, we are lucky here to have more than enough, thanks to population control. Obesity’s our problem, not malnutrition” (Aldiss,
What were the main points discussed in the film? The main points discussed in the film were that the food industry is very powerful. Food industries not always good to farmers or the animals they produce. Normally the meats that they produce or have people produce for them are not raised naturally.
Solely the expression “obesity” displays a moral hysteria which assigns public health issues on fat bodies and makes this body type an immoral one (Campbell). That shows that in the 19th century as well as today, health issues are being moralised and assigned to social class by the ones with power in society. It is important to be aware of the fact that diseases are being moralised, since it leads to suppression of people, that suffer from those health issues. Scientific language distracts from the fact that in this debate society doesn’t talk about health issues but rather about cultural problems. What is seriously troubling, is the fact that this pattern is used by people in power in the past as well as today.
The humans hunting elephants don't care for an orphan elephant going insane after its mother was murdered as long as the humans have food on the table for themselves and their families. Much like the giant food corporations in America this idea of self gain crowds out any form of empathy. “Lots of things are trade-offs” (Moss 269) Executive of the junk food Lunchables, Drane believes. He also believes that lunchables overall impact on the masses as “anything but a positive contribution to people's lives.” (Moss 269) Studies show otherwise and directly link junk foods to the obesity and hypertension crisis in America.
In “How Junk Food Can End Obesity,” by David H. Freedman, he claims that processed foods can help fix the obesity crisis in a more realistic manner, rather than whole-some foods. The popular opinion emphasizes whole-some foods because they aren’t informed about the similitude between processed and unprocessed foods. The essence of the essay is that people believe processed foods are bad and unhealthy for us, therefore whole-some foods are highly recommended for the health of an individual. Freedman mentions many prominent authors who wrote books on food processing, but the most influential voice in the food culture Freedman makes a point of is, American journalist, Michael Pollan. The media and Michael Pollan indicate that everything should be replaced with real, fresh, and unprocessed foods, instead of engineering in as much sugar, salt, and fat as possible into industrialized foods.
An issue that intrigues me is obesity, It intrigues me because my family has a problem. I am not obese per say but I fear that I might eventually get obese if I am not careful I might get obese, obesity is also a global problem as people do not access to healthy food choices and they do not have enough money to purchase fruits and vegetables. As a precaution I have adopted a vegetarian lifestyle to reduce my chances of getting obese and obtaining critical illnesses. After watching the video about Nauru obesity and they eating habits. People from Nauru did not have access to fruits an vegetables like most people, they were consuming a lot of fast foods, canned foods and consuming a lot of sugary products.
The information provided needs to enlighten the viewer in order to give them a new perspective to motivate the viewer to change their life. The film depicts that there is a direct link between meat and cancer. In addition to this statement, they correlate eating processed meats to the same risk as smoking a cigarette a day and increasing the likelihood of becoming exposed to lung cancer. Directly linking cancer to meat is one heavy claim to make but it is also grouping meat, tobacco, and asbestos all together. According to The World Health Organization, 3.2 million people died from pulmonary disease, 1.7 million from lung disease, and 1.3 million lost their lives to road injuries.
One of the dangerous consequences of the large amount of consumption of junk food is that it can damage health. According to Paul Hawaken, when Kine ranchers clear rain forests to raise produced beef