ipl-logo

Jarrod: An Example And Definition Of Syllogism

213 Words1 Pages

Hello everybody!

The deductive reasoning is when a person think logical rather on emotion. Deductive reasoning begin with a certain premises that are true, and then a person will judge whether or not the premises thoroughly make sense logically. (Matlin,2013). For example, All men are mortal. Harold is a man. There are two different types of deductive reasoning conditional reasoning and Syllogisms. It is considered sound and pure logic. (Matlin,2013) What is conditional reasoning? Conditional reasoning is when a conclusion can be either valid or invalid, even when premises are true. What is Syllogisms? According to Literary Devices.com, Syllogism is a rhetorical device that starts an argument with a reference to something general and from this it draws conclusion about something more specific. (Literary Devices, 2015). My example of a Syllogism, all humans are fast walkers, Jarrod is an human, so Jarrod is a fast walker. Jarrod is an human and he walks well, but Jarrod actually is an slow walker. Given the premises that all humans are fast walkers and Jarrod is an human, it is logical to assume that Jarrod is an fast walker …show more content…

(2015). Syllogism - Examples and Definition of Syllogism. Retrieved from http://literarydevices.net/syllogism/

Matlin, M. W. (10/2012). Cognition, 8th Edition. [VitalSource Bookshelf Online]. Retrieved from

Show More
Related

Free Will In Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron

640 Words | 3 Pages

For example, George has handicaps, but Hazel doesn’t. It is obvious, that it is not equal. Some people may think that if George took off his handicaps, he wouldn’t be the same as Hazel. Therefore,

Read More

Bleeding Kansas Argumentative Analysis

272 Words | 2 Pages

All men are by the nature equally free and independent, and have a certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and the liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and seeking and obtaining happiness and safety; and the right of all men to the control of their persons exists prior to the law, and is the inalienable. Like Foster and Tappan, delegates Charles and Sarah Robinson came from the strong abolitionist families and left comfortable livelihoods to ensure that the state of Kansas entered the Union as a free state. Leavenworth prospered from the railroad money in the form of the employees who constructed the tracks through the Cascade Mountains. In the early 1960’s the people of Leavenworth realized that they needed to make the incredible effort to change their situation and they decided to change the appearance of the town to bring in tourists.

Read More

Raylan's Argumentative Essay

1266 Words | 6 Pages

Raylan Givens was holding a federal warrant to serve on a man in the marijuana trade known as Angel Arenas, forty-seven, born in the U.S. but 100 percent of him Hispanic. “I met him,” Raylan said, “the time I was on court duty in Miami and he was up for selling khat. That Arab plant you chew on and get high.” “Just medium high,” Rachel Brooks said, in the front seat of the SUV, Raylan driving, early morning sun showing behind them. “Khat’s just catchin on, grown in California, big in San Diego among real Africans.”

Read More

Modest ! And Syco's Argumentative Analysis

257 Words | 2 Pages

'M not saying he 's absolutely a hundred prosent not straight - all 'm saying is that it 's a possibility that we, even after five years, cannot thoroughly deny. I think anyone labeling him straight is just as wrong as anyone labeling him gay, bi, pan or other. Something to keep in mind is the fact that in the business he 's in, being openly gay isn 't neccessarily even possible; it 's been quite legitly proven that their deal with Modest! and Syco has been less than ideal. Keep in mind these four men are all in a boyband, majority of which 's fans are young girls in their early or mid-teens (there are older fans too, obviously, especially in the Larrie part of the fandom) and being gay is unfortunately seen as a huge problem by some in the

Read More

Psy 315 Week 3 Study

676 Words | 3 Pages

Week 3 Practice Problems 1. The class handout cites 3 basic purposes for studying statistics: data reduction, inference, and identification of relationships. In your own words, describe these three ideas in a couple of sentences each. Why do we study statistics? We study statistics for 3 reasons below: Data Reduction:

Read More

Dred Scott's Argumentative Analysis

291 Words | 2 Pages

During Dred Scott vs. Sanford (1856), Chief Justice Taney stated that “The words “people of the United States” and “citizens” are synonymous terms” and “The question before us is, whether the [people of African ancestry] compose a portion of this people.” He answered his own question with “We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word “citizens” in the Constitution.” In 1787, the Constitution was written. “We the People” at the time were elite white males. It didn’t include colored, Natives, women, or impoverished people.

Read More

Analysis Of Doubt By John Patrick Shanley

791 Words | 4 Pages

Doubt essay paper Innocence and and guilty are not always black and white. Doubt by John Patrick Shanley, is a story about a scandal that a priest may have molested a child. That priest is Father Flynn, but he is innocent due to proof as well as his good character that goes against this heinous act. Father Flynn is an innocent man who is being attacked by a nun named Sister Aloysius who is hellbent to remove him from the school. But she has no physical evidence of him doing anything wrong and she admits it when Mrs. Muller asks if she has evidence “ No evidence?

Read More

Garretson's Argumentative Analysis

528 Words | 3 Pages

Finally, the quality of counterargument expressed throughout Garretson’s essay, has also been effected by her biased stance on vegetarianism, because she has been unable to display and acknowledge opposing views in her piece. It is very important for one to present counterarguments in their writing because it shows that the writer is not narrow-minded, and instead, is fair by considering other perspectives. Additionally, the use of counterargument adds credibility to a writing and makes the arguments that one presents more believable and trustworthy. Since Garretson does not display or acknowledge any opposing views in her essay, her arguments lose a great deal of credibility. There are many different approaches that Garretson could have taken

Read More

American Sniper Analysis

1231 Words | 5 Pages

The first type of reasoning is inductive reasoning. The first inductive reasoning found in this movie was shown in the scene where Kyle met his wife, Taya for the first time at the bar. In this scene, Taya assumed that Kyle must have the same negative attitudes such as arrogant and self-centered just like the other members of SEALs because he was one of them. This is clearly an inductive reasoning because it was based on someone’s opinion and thought. All the nine critical reading standards which are clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, depth, breadth, logic, significance and fairness are not being applied in this situation.

Read More

Ethos Pathos And Logos In Writing A Paper

238 Words | 1 Pages

Logical is a great way to close an argument. We as human like to go with the

Read More

Why Cats Make Better Pets Than Dogs Analysis

587 Words | 3 Pages

First, Curtis has a valid deductive argument because the premises provide logically conclusive grounds for the truth of the conclusion. His premises in (1) and (2) that cats are not required to go for a walk, and they poop in one place are well reasoned. He

Read More

How Is Fallacies Used In 12 Angry Men

1783 Words | 8 Pages

Fallacies are mostly used in the beginning when they are developing their argument. This is used extensively by those who initially started by saying that the young boy is guilty. Most of the jurors who initially say that the boy is guilty, use inductive reasoning to prove that what they are saying is correct, whether it makes sense or not, or if it has logic incorporated into their reasoning and conclusion that they were trying to present. On the other hand, the man who says from the start that the boy could be innocent used mostly deductive reasoning to prove his points. He wants to make sure that the logic he is providing or the inductive reasoning he is trying to prove right or wrong, is based on logic rather than speculation.

Read More

Lochner's Argumentative Analysis

703 Words | 3 Pages

During the late nineteenth century, the role of the government in the economy , money, and corporations in politics have been the subjects of some of the most important and pungent constitutional struggles in American history. Today, economic inequality is at its highest level since the early twentieth century. Concerns continue to grow towards the rising inequality that has become incompatible with a functioning and sustainable democracy. The comparison between today and the Lochner Era of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries continues to arise from many political and legal commenters. The Court has previously protected the political and economic interests of many corporations and wealthy individuals during periods of economic inequality.

Read More

Deductive Reasoning In Reasoning

1257 Words | 6 Pages

A good reasoning is a reasoning that leads to certain, true and valid conclusions. There are two kinds of reasoning, inductive and deductive reasoning. Both processes include the process of finding a conclusion from multiple premises although the way of approach may differ. Deductive reasoning uses general premises to make a specific conclusion; inductive reasoning uses specific premises to make a generalized conclusion. The two types of reasoning can be influenced by emotion in a different manner because of their different process to yield a conclusion.

Read More

Example Of A Fallacy Essay

986 Words | 4 Pages

A formal fallacy is one that may be identified by merely examining the form or structure of the argument. This type of fallacy is usually found in deductive arguments that have identifiable forms. Some of these are categorical syllogisms, hypothetical

Read More

More about Jarrod: An Example And Definition Of Syllogism

Related Topics

Open Document