In her article “The Attack,” Judith Miller describes the events leading to and of the 1984 Rajneeshee bioterror attack, which affected approximately one thousand individuals and a total of seven hundred and fifty one confirmed persons in the city The Dalles, Oregon. Miller’s story unfolds as she begins a few years prior to the attack: In Wasco County, 1981, not too far from The Dalles, Oregon a man named Rajneesh purchased a 64 thousand acre “Big Muddy Ranch,” which soon after became its own community. This area was initially intended to be a “Buddhafield,” an agricultural commune; however, soon after establishment followers of the ‘Bhagwan Shree’ created their own political leadership, enforcing rules and laws to the surrounding community
The main character of the book, Allison Mackenzie, came from a middle-class family that owned a home off Chestnut Street. Her mother, Constance, owned a shop in town called the Thrifty Corner Apparel Shoppe. Allison was born out of wedlock and her father was out of the picture. Constance was ashamed of this fact and hide her secret past from society. The situation surrounding Allison was an example of the time period’s denial of family dysfunction.
Dick from In Cold Blood maintained that he was less guilty and did not deserve the death penalty. In stating this, Dick was not correct that he was less guilty. There are justifiable proofs that diminish his chances of being less guilty. These proofs are found within the book and can be represented through his demeanors and actions prior to and after the night. Richard Eugene Hickock (Dick) in In Cold Blood is just as guilty as Perry in that he had clearly displayed his intent for killing the Clutter family.
If you were blamed for a crime you didn’t do, would you let that accusation go and let it tarnish your reputation? Would you let it fly by and have others judge from every angle? No, right? Normally people who get accused of crimes demand justice as they know they did not commit the crime and only justice can give them the freedom they deserve. But let’s look at Steve Harmon, the main character from the book Monster by Walter Dean Myers who was on trial for murder.
WOW! To Kill A Mockingbird has been a popular book for many years. The reason for this is it brings out a main theme which was common back then and still happens now. The theme of racism is seen in the book mainly at Tom Robinson's trial. The Ewell family represents the pride that whites had for innocent blacks.
Introduction The article “Is C.T.E. a Defense for Murder,” published in The New York Times, Amy Dillard, an associate professor at Baltimore School of Law, and Lisa A. Tucker, an associate professor at Dexter University’s Thomas R. Kline School of Law, give their views about Aaron Hernandez being convicted of murder. They believe that instead of sending him to prison he should have been sent to a therapeutic hospital to help with his brain disease. I chose this article because C.T.E. is a big issue right now with the NFL. This has been affecting many of the players and the sport itself.
How Jeff Smith landed in jail is an enthralling parable of a spirited and ambitious young man looking to bring positive change to the nation. Jeff Smith was born in St. Louis, Missouri in 1973 to a middle class family. Smith attended Ladue high school and then went on to graduate from UNC and Washington University with degrees in political science. In 2004 a Democratic Primary was being held for a Missouri U.S. congressional seat, and Smith decided to run. Smith at the time was a virtually unknown figure in the political world, but with the help from a young, bright, and driven campaign staff, he decided to run against a the scion Russ Carnahan.
In “Words on Trial,” Jack Hitt’s main argument addresses the following question: can linguists solve crimes that the police, or the court cannot. Moreover, this essay focuses on cases where the evidence presented was not examined correctly and have led to, in some cases, drastically disparate results compared to what the police presented as evidence. The essay starts off with an exhibit source, which is broken down throughout. Although “forensics” (forensic scientists) were not able to link any DNA to the crime (the murder of his wife and kids), experts were able to link him to a few circumstances of the case. Hitt agrees with this when he says, “At the trial, experts could show that some of the threatening e-mails had been sent from Coleman’s
Mr. Giles Corey, one of the most upstanding members of our community, has been allegedly accused of withholding information from the official courts. He “...has six hundred acres, and timber in addition….” (Miller 1316). Mr. Giles Corey is over an astounding eighty years of age and in no condition whatsoever to be held in the jailhouse. His third wife in this lifetime, Goody Martha Corey, has been accused as a witch.
Jake Brigance was a lawyer from the book A Time to Kill and Atticus Finch was also a lawyer from To Kill a Mockingbird. Jake defended Carl Lee Hailey, who gunned down two men who sexually brutalized his 10-year-old daughter. The trial was about racism as much as it was about murder. Hailey and Atticus were black. Atticus was a lawyer for Tom Robinson who was accused for raping a white women.
In the summer of 2002, Brian Banks, a 16-year-old outstanding high school football linebacker from Long Beach Polytechnic High in Southern California had a promising future ahead of him. He had a verbal agreement to play for USC once he finished high school, but he had a lot of recruitment letters coming to him. Unfortunately, his future was cut short. Wanetta Gibson, a 15-year-old who also attended Long Beach Polytechnic, had accused Brian Banks of rape. That summer morning, Wanette and Brian were making out in the stairwell of the school, that night, Brian was being arrested for rape.
The Detection of Dishonesty Samaira Ansari's quote, "One lie is enough to question all truth," is exemplified in the story of Brian Fogel. Initially, Fogel was a competitive amateur cyclist who became interested in the topic of doping in sports and sought to understand how easy it was to cheat drug tests. He enlisted the help of Grigory Rodchenkov, the head of Russia's anti-doping lab, to investigate the issue. What began as a simple inquiry soon revealed a much larger story of a state-sponsored doping program and cover-up by the Russian government. Fogel dedicated himself to protecting Rodchenkov's testimony and bringing the truth to light.
In Brentwood, California, ex-wife of O.J. Simpson, Nicole Brown, as well as waiter Ron Goldman, were murdered on the residence of 875 South Bundy Drive on June 12, 1994. Moments later, LAPD officers arrived on the scene alerting Simpson of the tragic murder. Due to the history of violence by Simpson towards Nicole, many had reason to believe that O.J. committed acts of cruelty leading to the famous trial of ‘The People versus O.J. Simpson.’ There are many aspects of the cases leading to the final verdict of the trial including the prosecution and the defense. Due to the certain acts of racism as well as the lack of contemporary evidence introduced to the case, the prosecution’s mistakes and faults lead to the final ruling of the O.J. Simpson case.
The Conspirator is a movie directed by Robert Redford that brought a tragic error in the American legal system to light, the trial of Mary Elizabeth Surratt. Surratt was put on trial for her alleged accessory to John Wilkes Booth in the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln. This movie follows the court proceedings; however, as with most Hollywood productions, The Conspirator is only to some extent historically accurate. The significant parts of the movie, such as, the main people and overall story ring true to history. Redford just made some minor tweaks.
The Trial, published in 1925, after Kafka’s death in 1924, depicts the internalized conflict Joseph K faces in a society flawed by its abusive power in the law system. The oppressive and mysterious trial wins the reader’s attention in trying to figure out, at the same time as K himself, what the latter is accused of. On the morning of his 30th birthday, Joseph K disregards his accusation as he presumes to be innocent. However, as the protagonist evolves throughout the novel, his conviction of an unavoidable execution leads him to fame his “shame.” Joseph K is a developing character.
