ipl-logo

An Analysis Of Marcia Clark's Without A Doubt By O. J. Simpson

994 Words4 Pages

In Brentwood, California, ex-wife of O.J. Simpson, Nicole Brown, as well as waiter Ron Goldman, were murdered on the residence of 875 South Bundy Drive on June 12, 1994. Moments later, LAPD officers arrived on the scene alerting Simpson of the tragic murder. Due to the history of violence by Simpson towards Nicole, many had reason to believe that O.J. committed acts of cruelty leading to the famous trial of ‘The People versus O.J. Simpson.’ There are many aspects of the cases leading to the final verdict of the trial including the prosecution and the defense. Due to the certain acts of racism as well as the lack of contemporary evidence introduced to the case, the prosecution’s mistakes and faults lead to the final ruling of the O.J. Simpson case. Found in his book “Murder in Brentwood”, Mark Fuhrman describes his personal interests about the trial as well as the prosecution. He finds that …show more content…

From an experts view, Marcia Clark is able to simplify some of the keys aspects involved with case throughout her book. Her novel admits to some of the faults involved with the Prosecution as they moved throughout the case. “Your Honor, at this time, the People would ask that Mr.Simpson step forward and try on the glove at Bundy as well as the glove recovered at Rockingham,” - Chris Darden (393). From his oblivious decision, Chris Darden was motivated into allowing O.J. to try on a match of the original gloves leading to then not fitting the suspect's hands. This then was a major incident which convinced the jury of O.J.’s innocence. “Detective Fuhrman, did you plant or manufacture any evidence in this case,” - Johnnie Cochran (393). The defense is able to handle to the trial’s witnesses fittingly as they allow them to pursue many views of the case to persuade the Jury. These hardships of the prosecution helped lead to the innocence of O.J.

Show More
Related
414 Words | 2 Pages

Simpson was arrested for the murders of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and Ron Goldman. Simpson said he was innocent and hired Cochran along with Robert Shapiro, Alan Dershowitz, F. Lee Bailey, Barry Scheck, and Robert Kardashian. This group of lawyers was called the “dream team” in what was considered the “trial of the century”. Cochran was the leader during the trial and set up a strong defense for Simpson. He challenged the evidence and pointed out that one of the investigating police officers, Mark Fuhrman, had a history of being racist.

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

However, the attorneys have to convince the jury that their client is not guilty or guilty. By analyzing each attorney's closing argument, it is clear that Kathy O’Brien provided the most convincing argument. Firstly, Asa Briggs, defense attorney for James King, enlightened

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

A pair of gloves that OJ had owned for years were found at the crime scene near the bodies with one being there and another at his house with the one at the crime scene with blood on them. In the document, O.J. Simpson says "a glove matching the one found near the dead bodies surfaced on Simpson's property". And in the article, Simpson gloves match the evidence, it says "glove expert Richard Rubin testified Tuesday. Rubin, who was called back to the stand for the prosecution's rebuttal case, said he was 100 percent positive the gloves are the same unique model. "

Read More
1051 Words | 5 Pages

Do you Think Oj did it? There will be various pieces of evidence presented to you in this essay on both of the trials of OJ Simpson Did He kill Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman? Did he rob that Memorabilia shop at gunpoint? Stick around to find out and and come up with your own decision act like you're one of the jurors.

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

The OJ Simpson murder case was a criminal trial held at the Los Angeles County Superior Court, in which former NFL player OJ Simpson was tried on two counts of murder for the death of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend, Ron Goldman. He was found not guilty even though there were numerous counts of evidence that showed that OJ was the one who killed his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and Ron Goldman. OJ Simpson should have been guilty of murdering Nicole because there was DNA evidence, he had dreams of killing Nicole Simpson, and jealousy could have been the motive that led him to kill Nicole. There was blood found at the crime scene that traced back to OJ’s DNA. Marcia Clark, the lead prosecutor of the murder case, revealed that a blood drop found near the bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman has been linked to OJ Simpson through RFLP testing - the highest level of DNA examination, commonly known as a genetic fingerprint.

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

After a twelve-hour interrogation, Brenton Butler confessed to the murder of Mary Ann Stephens. A key claim made by the defense attorneys in this case was that this was a false confession, and after reaching a verdict of not guilty, the jury clearly agreed. The factors that led the false confession were laid out in a scene during the documentary. Instead of using the interview to discover the truth, the interrogators specifically sought out a confession from the suspect. They began the interrogation with the presumption that Brenton Butler was guilty.

Read More
1829 Words | 8 Pages

Simpson Trials.) One of the first questions was about the footprints that were leaving the crime scene. The prosecution asked O.J. if he had the shoes that would leave a footprint like that on the ground, after O.J. said no, then multiple pictures came up of O.J. wearing the same shoes that he said he did not have. (Edelman) After the evidence was piling up against O.J. the jury came to a verdict and on February 4, 1997, the jury made a decision that O.J. was liable for 8.5 million in compensatory damages, and lost some of his memorabilia.

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

In 1995, former NFL player O.J. Simpson was put on trial for the murder of his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. O.J. Simpson’s trial is believed to be one of the most popular and controversial trials to ever take place in the Los Angeles Superior Court. O.J. was found not guilty by the verdict and was released to go on and live his life. But my belief is, O.J. should have been found guilty, because of all the of the evidence that was found at the scene and later on in the investigation they discovered more evidence. Also because of the book that Nicole’s brothers published later after her death.

Read More
413 Words | 2 Pages

O.J Simpson should have been claimed guilty instead of not guilty. Was O.J Simpson charged not guilty because of his race or maybe because of his fame? Even a decade after the verdict, an NBC News poll found those divisions remained. O.J Simpson went on trial for the killings of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman 22 years ago. The heavy coverage started even before the trial began.

Read More
1818 Words | 8 Pages

The court cases of Manson, Leopold and Loeb, and Bukharin were utilized by the main defendants to provide commentary on certain aspects of their respective societies. Darrow’s closing argument focused on the plight of wealthy teenagers, the course materials introduced in the educational system, the historical progress made regarding the death penalty, and the impact that sentencing Leopold and Loeb to die would have on society. Manson’s testimony focused on the American jail system, President Nixon and the average person’s role in the Vietnam war and society’s outsiders. Bukharin’s last plea primarily focused on how the Show Trials will look to future generations and future societies. By analyzing the cases, comparing and contrasting them with

Read More
1411 Words | 6 Pages

As we all know, O.J. Simpson was acquitted. The court had ten out of twelve jurors find Simpson not guilty. One reason he was acquitted, was because the glove found at the scene did not fit. It simply would not go on Simpson’s hand.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

When the verdict came in, he was found not guilty. Despite OJ Simpson’s acquittal, a wealth of evidence points to his guilt: OJ Simpson had a past filled with domestic violence, he has a history of making poor decisions, and several pieces of DNA evidence

Read More
1376 Words | 6 Pages

In the early ‘90s, it was impossible to turn on the television, the radio, or even open a newspaper without hearing about the O.J. Simpson trial. After the brutal murder of Nicole Brown (his ex wife) and Ron Goldman (her friend), all eyes turned to O.J.. He became more than just the loved athlete and actor that he had remained as for a majority of his life. Titles such as “murderer” now floated around his name. However, a vast majority of the public refused to believe he was guilty.

Read More
1217 Words | 5 Pages

A day later OJ was notified of the murders while on a business trip in Chicago. When he returns to Los Angeles he is temporarily handcuffed. “If the early reports of the murder of the wife of the ex-NFL football star (turned-NBC-sports-announcer) hadn't caught people's full attention, Simpson's surreal Bronco ride on the day of his arrest certainly did--ninety-five million television viewers witnessed the slow police chase live”(Linder). The 133 days of televised courtroom testimony turned innumerable viewers into Simpson trial addicts. The case on OJ was built on multiple pieces of evidence.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

OJ Simpson was a very achieved person player until he made one big mistake. The trial of OJ Simpson was a long stressful process to prove a star innocent or guilty of murder. This took Place in the state of California on October 3, 1995. OJ was tried for a murder crime of his ex-wife and another man. In the end OJ turned out to be not guilty of this crime.

Read More

More about An Analysis Of Marcia Clark's Without A Doubt By O. J. Simpson

Related Topics

Open Document