In Brentwood, California, ex-wife of O.J. Simpson, Nicole Brown, as well as waiter Ron Goldman, were murdered on the residence of 875 South Bundy Drive on June 12, 1994. Moments later, LAPD officers arrived on the scene alerting Simpson of the tragic murder. Due to the history of violence by Simpson towards Nicole, many had reason to believe that O.J. committed acts of cruelty leading to the famous trial of ‘The People versus O.J. Simpson.’ There are many aspects of the cases leading to the final verdict of the trial including the prosecution and the defense. Due to the certain acts of racism as well as the lack of contemporary evidence introduced to the case, the prosecution’s mistakes and faults lead to the final ruling of the O.J. Simpson case. Found in his book “Murder in Brentwood”, Mark Fuhrman describes his personal interests about the trial as well as the prosecution. He finds that …show more content…
From an experts view, Marcia Clark is able to simplify some of the keys aspects involved with case throughout her book. Her novel admits to some of the faults involved with the Prosecution as they moved throughout the case. “Your Honor, at this time, the People would ask that Mr.Simpson step forward and try on the glove at Bundy as well as the glove recovered at Rockingham,” - Chris Darden (393). From his oblivious decision, Chris Darden was motivated into allowing O.J. to try on a match of the original gloves leading to then not fitting the suspect's hands. This then was a major incident which convinced the jury of O.J.’s innocence. “Detective Fuhrman, did you plant or manufacture any evidence in this case,” - Johnnie Cochran (393). The defense is able to handle to the trial’s witnesses fittingly as they allow them to pursue many views of the case to persuade the Jury. These hardships of the prosecution helped lead to the innocence of O.J.