ipl-logo

Jim Crow Laws: Plessy Vs. Ferguson

763 Words4 Pages

The Jim Crow Laws Jim Crow Laws guaranteed that African Americans were treated as second class citizens without the freedom and liberties promised by our nation’s constitution. Many segregation laws, called The Jim Crow Laws, were already in place throughout the South before the Supreme Court’s Decision in Plessy v Ferguson. Growing up as a Native American was kind of rough on people, they were separated from others. They were only allowed to use certain water fountains, certain bathrooms plus they had to wait for the Americans to get done before they could walk into a grouchy store. Religious liberty, like free speech, is not an absolute right. The caucus wants black churches to take up the case of voter ID laws as the moral equivalent of Jim Crow Laws. HISTORY/BACKGROUND. …show more content…

When the Plessy case was heard, all the southern states had passed laws that required segregation on at least some of their railroads. The Facilities assigned to blacks were inferior to those that were set aside for the whites. The motivating force behind the Jim Crow Laws was white supremacy. Jim Crow Laws were rigidly enforced to keep blacks in a position of inferiority. African Americans who broke or tried to break the laws faced the possibility of arrest, lynching, and public punishment at the hands of the

Show More
Related
159 Words | 1 Pages

The whites thought that sooner or later if we let them vote that they’re going to take over. The Jim Crow Laws system stopped the blacks from voting. That caught the Civil Right leaders and that brought attention to Mississippi. That made it acceptable for that 7% of black people to vote. In Document B which was a “Freedom Summer Pamphlet.”

Read More
300 Words | 2 Pages

Thurgood Marshall was born on July 2, 1908. In 1930 he states for to the University of Maryland Law School but was denied because of him being black. However years later when he applied to Howard University when he graduated, he opens up a small law practice in Baltimore. Marshall won the first Major case in civil rights was due to the precedent of Plessy v Ferguson where it states racial segregation laws for public facilities under the doctrine of "separate but equal", where he sued University of Maryland Law School to admit a young African American named Donald Gaines Murray. With his well-known skills as a lawyer and his passion for the civil rights Marshall because the chief of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People,

Read More
233 Words | 1 Pages

Decided in 1896, the Plessy v Ferguson law was a landmark constitutional law case of the US Supreme Court. This case upheld state segregation laws for public places under the belief of the slogan “separate but equal.” It all began when Homer Plessy purchased a first class ticket to travel from New Orleans to Covington, La, taking a vacant seat in a white only car. This was ironic because he was seven eighths percent white and one out of eight percent black. He was arrested for breaking the law of 1890 stating that colored and whites have to sit in separate car’s riding a train due to the slogan separate but equal; emphasizing that everyone has the right to ride a train as long as they sit different cars (McBride, 2007).

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

"We must learn to live together as brothers, or we will parish as fools" (Martin Luther King Jr). That is what was said from one of the most experienced leaders, at during a very judgmental time. Martin Luther King Jr was just one of the many men that changed America. During this time, there was a lot of harassment towards blacks. They were not considered as an equal people.

Read More
95 Words | 1 Pages

An example of a Supreme Court overturning, would be Plessy vs Ferguson. States from the south had laws that had a disadvantage for black people. Plessy who is a light colored black, decided to sit on the white section of the train, and declared his ancestry a couple of minutes after. People demanded him to move, but he refused. He was arrested for not moving.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

The Jim Crow laws were a set of anti-Black laws that could be seen mostly in the southern and border states and demoted Blacks to second-class citizens (Pilgrim). The Whites thought they needed these laws because many people at high positions believed that Blacks’ mental capacity was inferior to Whites (Pilgrim). Whites

Read More
1551 Words | 7 Pages

For nearly a century, the United States was occupied by the racial segregation of black and white people. The constitutionality of this “separation of humans into racial or other ethnic groups in daily life” had not been decided until a deliberate provocation to the law was made. The goal of this test was to have a mulatto, someone of mixed blood, defy the segregated train car law and raise a dispute on the fairness of being categorized as colored or not. This test went down in history as Plessy v. Ferguson, a planned challenge to the law during a period ruled by Jim Crow laws and the idea of “separate but equal” without equality for African Americans. This challenge forced the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of segregation, and in result of the case, caused the nation to have split opinions of support and

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

Can be separate but equal? The supreme court thought so in 1892.Just before The Supreme court decided this the 14th amendment was passed. It stated that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States”(The United States Constitution) were considered citizens. In the next coming years tension grew as African Americans soon found out that their separate stations were not equal to the white stations. Homer Plessy was the first to stand up and voice his opinion.

Read More
1194 Words | 5 Pages

THE 14TH AMENDMENT In this paper, I will be talking about the equal protection of laws clause in 14th amendment interpreted in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson. This paper will focus on the concern over racial injustice in the judgment of Plessy v. Ferguson. Racial injustice is being looked in several aspects i.e. the argument of absolute equality, the objection to inferiority argument, the personal liberty argument and the good faith argument. In the end, I will conclude that the decision of Plessy v. Ferguson is a pernicious decision.

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

Southern states passed the Jim Crow laws or, “black codes”, which limited the rights of African Americans in southern states. For example, blacks had certain housing areas, they also could not use the same buildings as whites, and they also could not marry a white person. Congress ended up not enjoying the

Read More
1022 Words | 5 Pages

The Jim Crow laws weren’t originally named the Jim Crow laws in the reconstruction era (1865-1877) when they were first passed. They were started to called that by the actor named Jim Crow who was a white man who blacked his face and he danced around and sang about not having a care in the world. The Reconstruction era was the period of time after the civil war after the north triumphed over the south. Things weren’t a smooth transition for the people of the south with many people staying as racists and the creation of hate groups and deadly gangs such as the Ku Klux Klan were rampant after the northern soldiers left the south when reconstruction was over. The treatment of the innocent black people was unfair and unjust.

Read More
1257 Words | 6 Pages

Created for racial segregation, laws enforcing the concept of “separate but equal” were established by the 1896 Plessy vs. Ferguson U.S. Supreme Court case. Jim Crow Laws sparked the formation of the fighting youth, which were “...seeking to rid America of the scourge of racial segregation and discrimination―not only at lunch tables but in every aspect of life. ”Organized nonviolent methods of protesting such as sit-ins, led by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and Freedom Rides, took place. Black youth determined civil disobedience was the quickest and most successful way to desegregation. They “insisted that the focus of the struggle be nonviolent direct action in the streets, and non legal skirmishes in the courtroom.”

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

During 1865 to 1900, freedoms for African Americans were extremely limited socially. After Reconstruction ended, African Americans were being segregated from white society. Many Southern states created laws that segregated blacks from whites. This included segregation in schools, parks, water fountains, and hospitals. These laws became known as the Jim Crow Laws.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

5th Hour Cause and Effect Essay Jim Crow laws The Jim Crow laws were unfair and unjust to all African-Americans by making them unequal. The Jim Crow laws are laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States. It used the term separate but equal, even though conditions for African Americans were always worst than their white counterparts. They could not eat at the same restaurant as white people, they could not used the same restrooms, and they couldn't even use the same drinking fountain.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Segregation had a huge effect of the lives of many African Americans. Jim Crow laws were state and local laws enforcing racial segregation. The laws tried to express that African Americans and Whites were “separate but equal”, but were nowhere close to having equal rights. Segregation was forced in schools, hospitals, transportation, restaurants, cemeteries, beaches, and many more. African American children were chosen for a social experiment and were placed in a room full of dolls and had to choose which doll they thought was the prettiest.

Read More

More about Jim Crow Laws: Plessy Vs. Ferguson

Open Document