ipl-logo

John Galtung's Theory Of Conflict Analysis

1038 Words5 Pages

John Galtung recommended that conflict could be observed as a triangle, with contradiction (C), attitude (A) and behaviour. He explained that all three aspects must be there in a full conflict condition. Contradiction is an important factor of a conflict which mentioned through the parties, their intentions and the clash of interests between them. Attitude comprises the parties’ views and misunderstandings of each other and of themselves. Behaviour is the third factor which can involve coercion or cooperation, gestures defining conciliation or hostility. The violent conflict approach is defined through coercion, threats, and destructive assaults. Galtung’s, model suggests that each of these components influence one another, and while each …show more content…

It is a particular type of third party involvement. The literature review explains the lack of agreement about the description of mediation, though Bercovitch explained an appropriate description. He explained mediation as a system of conflict management, linked to but particular from the parties' own attempts, where the conflicting parties or their representatives look the support, or accept an offer of support, from a person, group, organisation or state to modify, impact or impact their behaviour or perceptions, without resorting to physical force or appealing the legal authority” …show more content…

These are applied by the procedure to enhance the cause of conflict resolution;
f) Mediation is a voluntary type of conflict management. This defines the challengers in an intractable issue, select whether to start or prolong mediation or not, and they keep their command over the result of their issue, with their autonomy to accept or refuse any elements of the procedure or the final contract,
g) Mediation performs only on an ad hoc basis. Once completed, a mediator departs the field of the conflict.
Third party mediation is not confined to mediation by superpower states, such as the United States or Russia. Mediation efforts by small and medium size powers are sometimes a good option (e.g. the Algerian mediation between the US and Iran regarding the American hostages). Third parties can involve also international organisations and nongovernmental organisations (NGO). For example, the Organisation of African States (OAS) acted as a mediator in the Algerian-Moroccan border conflict of Western Sahara,

Show More
Related
1120 Words | 5 Pages

“When we talk about analytic versus intuitive decision-making, neither is good or bad. What is bad is if you use either of them in an inappropriate circumstance.” Preparation for mediation uses both these methods. While it is important have an opening statement, certain points you wish to cover, question outlines, and knowledge of background information when available; much of the actual mediation is left to chance. A good mediator needs to be able to think on their toes, always ready to react and assess the parties and their

Read More
1257 Words | 6 Pages

Mediation is where the two parties aim to reach a mutual resolution on the dispute with the help of a mediator. Mediation is helpful when both parties want to come to a decision without going to court as they settle the dispute themselves. Mediation does not decide on the dispute it leaves control of the outcome with the parties. Arbitration is a formal way of resolving disputes, it's set up so opposing parties present their cases to an independent third person. The arbitrator makes a decision based on hearing the case and the evidence presented to them.

Read More
1572 Words | 7 Pages

A simple act of violence can genuinely affect an individual's state of mind. Through violence, individuals feel empowered and are tempted to prolong their violent nature. This results in one heinous act, following with worse violence. In Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Ishmael Beah’s A Long Way Gone: Memoirs of A Boy Soldier, both authors effectively highlight a theme, that violence will ultimately lead to more violence.

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

A person may avoid face-to-face confrontation and use a middle person of peace to help resolve the conflict (Elm- p67). Being a person from African, if I used a mediator, it would be fine and get results. However, to American, per say, this would appear to be cowardly and seen as someone attempting to escape the issue of confrontation. To an American it appears they are avoiding the problem, or escaping, when that may not be the case. Thus, the wording here may be inaccurate for a cross-cultural

Read More
1408 Words | 6 Pages

It is important to keep the groups small for mediation because smaller groups are more likely to be successful in mediation talks (Klerman and Klerman 692). While reducing the number of people at the table inevitably reduces the amount of voices that can be represented, the committees will still be large enough as to not marginalize significant voices. Each mediation must also have somebody controlling the discussion. In this instance, legislators in Florida will pass a bill allocating $200,000 to pay for professional mediators from the United States Department of Justice directing the discussion. A professional mediator can analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each case before setting expectations for the results (Klerman and Klerman 691).

Read More
1765 Words | 8 Pages

An approach considered by the authors for reducing intergroup conflict is the same approach used in negotiations. Citing several books on positive negotiation tactics, including Galluccio (2015), the authors explain that when two parties successfully negotiate a resolution - whereby the parties are content with the outcomes - the parties are more amicable towards one another in future encounters. The authors refer to specific real-world examples of political world peace negotiations where this was the

Read More
1674 Words | 7 Pages

This vicious cycle continues entrenching attitudes among both sides. The result of all these is escalated violence, which claims victims from both

Read More
664 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Chapter five of her book Shadows of War, Carolyn Nordstrom shares her views on war in terms of social, physical and mental goals and punishes of such violence. To begin, one of the first goals of war as defined by Nordstrom is a direct result of a threat of loss of control. She explains that it is common for one military to feel the need to destroy another when their control over a certain (land area owned or controlled by someone) is under threat (56). An interesting point that Nordstrom makes is relating to/about (community of people/all good people in the world)'s do not tell the difference between the existence of different violences. As stated by Nordstrom, most people will naturally tell/show the difference between different wars; however, very few tell/show the difference between the experience of violence throughout such wars (57).

Read More
375 Words | 2 Pages

In addition, the mediator encouraged empathy from each party by encouraging both parties to step into the other party’s situation, fostering wiliness to work with the other party by the acknowledging

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

Springer (2009) believes that violence is a gross stereotype which is associated with the depiction of the culture in the context of 'war in terror '. African, Asian and Islamic cultures are said to be highly violent. Thus, any discourse that suggests violence should be viewed as contextually specific, because it is bound to particular places in which the culture of violence is formed. Therefore,

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

Nonetheless, if negative states of mind created in every nation amid the conflict are not tended to, these may produce to further conflict later on. In the interim, conflict change goes for a principal change in conduct of people and the relationship between two or additionally disputing groups. This model is a great deal more exemplified in Bush and Folger 's hypothesis of transformative intervention and Lederach 's model of conflict change. To Lederach, he utilizes the term conflict resolution to allude to peace building.

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

3. Mediation Communications Mediator confidentiality for communications is essential to the success of mediation. But it is not an inviolable principle; there are certain cases where it will be encroached upon, lest in recognition of the public interest that a mediator fulfils. One way to approach this might be via a blanket rule with specific exceptions where society’s interest outweighs the interest of confidentiality. 3.1.

Read More
1566 Words | 7 Pages

Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution in which a neutral third party helps disputants resolve a conflict (Bishop, p. 64). The employee/supervisor mediation was my first experience role-playing as a mediator in a dispute. I enjoyed the experience and recognized how significant the role of a mediator was. There are many strategies/avenues a mediator can take when conducting a mediation and it is imperative that the mediator is able to adapt their mediation strategy in order to satisfy the party’s needs. This in-class role-play gave me the opportunity to apply all the knowledge that I learned during the course, to a real workplace scenario.

Read More
923 Words | 4 Pages

Cultural mediation is the ability of a third party subject to find new meanings opposed to the previous prevailing cultural meanings. Mediation is extremely important for understanding the logic of the humanistic culture of fundamental importance to study the dynamics of mediation elements in various philosophical systems, that is, the study of the dynamics of mediation itself. Civilization is the promotion of people on the way to understand the world as a complex manifold. Only in this reality mediation makes sense.

Read More
1913 Words | 8 Pages

What is Mediation? Prior to the parties getting involved in a mediation session it is understood that the parties are in agreeance to coming together as a means to promote and to bring forward a resolution. Anything that occurs within the session is understood to be confidential and if a party in any way shape or form feels that they no longer want to continue with the process, they have every right to end everything at that point in time. Mediation is a different yet effective way to resolve problems where the parties bring about their own solution to their problem contrary to going in front of a judge or an arbitrator whom will have full control and decide on behalf of you. Mediation helps the parties involved reach a final solution through a mutual and voluntary agreement, this is exactly what makes mediation a process that should be looked into if the situation permits it.

Read More

More about John Galtung's Theory Of Conflict Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document