ipl-logo

John Locke Essay

826 Words4 Pages

JOHN LOCKE(1632-1704) John Locke was born in 1632, Wrington. Throughout his lifetime he was interested in philosophy of emprist and caused important developments. So we can say the founder of empricisim. He was studied in Christ Church College and he was became theory and philosophy academician. Also he was studied medicine and acquaintance with scientific application was influenced his philosophy. In 1690, he was finished his essay ‘ İhsan Anlayışına İlişkin Ünlü Öykü’. In the essay, it analyzes the nature of the human mind and the processes it recognizes. He argued that information does not come from birth. According to him, the mind is an empty box (tabula rasa). And when we experience five senses, we can fill it. At the …show more content…

Thinking of Berkeley and Hume was encouraged to Locke’s thinking. Also the difference between basic and secondary qualities is the sign of mechanical philosophy. The basic concepts of political philosophy are natural law and natural rights theory. Natural law must be separated from divine law. Natural law is logically accessible and is for everyone but divine law is accessible only by virtue. He accepts that there must be a moral law in the theory of natural law in the second government contract. The purpose of the contract is to protect everyone's rights. Natural law and natural rights work together in a limited government formula. According to Locke, we should believe in a natural religion to respect the rights of others. Although it initially sounds as though Locke has carved out separate roles for faith and reason, it must be noted that these descriptions make belief subordinate to reason in a subtle way. According to Locke, “Whatever GOD hath revealed, is certainly true; no Doubt can be made of it. This is the proper Object of Faith: But whether it be a divine Revelation, or no, Reason must judge; which can never permit the Mind to reject a greater Evidence to embrace what is less evident, nor allow it to entertain Probability in opposition to Knowledge and Certainty.” (Ayers, M. 1993. Locke: Epistemology and Ontology. New York:

Open Document