ipl-logo

John Locke On Legitimate Government

1538 Words7 Pages

A legitimate government can have several different interpretations and slight moderations, but the rudiments of a legitimate government can mostly be agreed on by many.
According to my definition, a legitimate government exists when it is supported constantly by its people. The entirety of people should have a right to put their leader(s) in power, and once voting on a leader, they should continue to have a say in policy to ensure their voices are not neglected.
Equality of all inhabitants of a regime should never be compromised, and it should be a priority to provide every citizen with the highest amount of liberty possible. The government should work to protect the rights of their citizens and fairly regulate the laws in place. After studying …show more content…

Further, Locke creates a contract where the people are able to revolt if they completely disagree with their government. His contract also states that
“tacit” consent, or consent because one simply lives on the regime’s ground, is a valid form of consent to back a government. But this format still does not allow for the people to be heard, because they are not recommended to act on their ideals until it is too late. To explain further, they are not consistently given the opportunity to voice their values and opinions in the contract created by Locke. All this being said, it is fair to award Rousseau’s social contract with the best setup of consent of its people when looking at a legitimate government.
In addition, it is important for a social contract to eliminate inequality to its best ability because a legitimate government is to treat its citizens fairly. This is because in a regime where different peoples are unequal in the eyes of their government, rights are allocated unequally to discriminated groups. For example, groups that are seen as lesser or minorities are not given …show more content…

Therefore, inequality is created when someone is thought to be of less worth for their specific passions and occupations. All in all, Rousseau leaves the least room for inequality in his social contract, therefore dealing the highest amount of legitimacy to a government possible.
Another important feature of a legitimate government is the promotion of the liberty of its citizens. Liberty is representing and maintaining freedom for individuals. This is a more philosophical approach to maintaining a legitimate government, but it is not of any less importance to other factors. This is because, in a majority of populations, the general will on individual freedom is that it should be as high as possible. That being said, a legitimate government should aim at increasing freedom instead of decreasing it. Rousseau’s contract does just this because it advocates for the obedience to a law because the people have agreed on and have participated in creating that law. This could, for example, mean that by implementing a law in which people cannot steal from someone else, people will be more liberated because they are free from losing property. In a Hobbesian contract however, the people are to lose liberty.

Show More
Related
506 Words | 3 Pages

In The Social Contract, Rousseau tries to "harmonize individual liberty with governmental authority. The social contract was basically an agreement on the part of the entire society to be governed by its general will. If any individual wished to follow his own self-interest. He should be compelled to abide by the general will. This means nothing less than he will be forced to be free,"(511).

Read More
1631 Words | 7 Pages

In any other system, the people give up their freedom without any reason; it should be created only if all agree to it. The social contract would exist for the purpose of self-preservation, pushing the common will of the Sovereign. To convince his audience of these complex ideas, Rousseau must stay organized and be intentional in his rhetorical

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore, they take the opportunity. 3.the social contract suggests that we have to give up individual freedoms to higher officials to assure what's "right". As a contract is defined between two parties each party may have to give up some individual freedoms

Read More
1504 Words | 7 Pages

Rousseau in "Discourses on Inequality" and "On the Social Contract" investigates the nature of freedom and its place in human society. At the same time, equality is a concept that Rousseau explores and is a central question that our society today focuses on. Thus, it is worthwhile to investigate whether a free society is necessarily an equal one; in other words, whether freedom is synonymous to equality. Rousseau separates absolute equality into both physical and moral equality; therefore, the discussion will proceed by first investigating whether both or either forms of equality are possible within a free society, whether in the state of nature or in Rousseau's social contract. One more sentence here about my argument.

Read More
1253 Words | 6 Pages

The questions of the whether social inequality is justified and the extent of government to address said inequality are some of the foundations upon which societies and economies are built. Two key philosophers on this issue – John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau – differ on this subject. In Two Treatises on Government, Locke holds that individuals have a right to property derived from their labor, citizens consent to the existence of inequality in society, and governments are instituted among men to protect said property. In contrast, Rousseau writes in Discourse on the Origin of Inequality and The Social Contract that inequality should be strictly limited and that governments have a duty to act in the best interest of its citizens by maintaining

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

child. Such authority has been extended through force and not by nature, hence political authority does not exist in nature. In the Social Contract, Rousseau explains that Grotius proposes the right of slavery between a king and his people. This social contract represents an agreement that the people must surrender their freedoms to the king. Rousseau argues that Grotius does not clarify what the people receive in return for their obedience.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

If something is contrary to the general will, then it is contrary to the good of the society. It?s the person force to be free? However, that Rousseau is writing a formula for totalitarianism. A tyrannical despot rules a totalitarian government, and has the power to force any citizen to do whatever they government want. Nowhere in The Social Contract does Rousseau advise a leader to have such much power.

Read More
1803 Words | 8 Pages

These governments failing to uphold their end of the deal, which isn’t actually made by the government and people but rather Rousseau’s attempt to create a perfect contract, is one of the greatest sins that a government can commit. Any legitimate political authority must rule with the consent of the governed, meaning that all people must convene and agree upon the laws which the sovereign will enact and the government will enforce. It is crucial to note the difference, in Rousseau’s mind, between the sovereign and the government, which are often viewed as synonyms. Rousseau considered the sovereign to be comprised of the general will of all people, not necessarily one person, but the agreement of them all combined. The government was the enforcer and the institution to which day-to-day matters fell to in order to

Read More
1149 Words | 5 Pages

These two different groups were treated unequally when Rousseau’s concept of “the government acted as an instrument of the rich while suppressing the poor.” (Lecture) He argues that the rich and the poor individuals living in a civil society are influenced differently by the state of war. The dilemma usually occurs when the private property of individuals was at stake in their living community during the timeframe of the French and American Revolution. During the 18th century, the discussion of Rousseau’s view on the origin of government shows that natural rights were only given to the wealthy rich people thus limiting the poor, which was the majority of the population at the time, from having access to the rights that the minorities of the population enjoyed.

Read More
1553 Words | 7 Pages

So, government gets established, through a contract, which purports to guarantee equality and protection for all. Here it is important to mention that Rousseau sees the true purpose in this first contract to extend the inequalities that private property has produced. In other words, the contract, which claims to be in the interests of everyone equally, is really in the interests of the few who have become stronger and richer as a result of the developments of private

Read More
1731 Words | 7 Pages

Both Locke and Rousseau propose a government with limited powers based on an original consent, but their arguments diverge with regard to property rights. Locke argues that property rights preexist society, and that men leave the state

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

In the opening of Rousseau’s Social Contract - " Man is born free, and yet we see him everywhere in chains." Rousseau apparently gives his social contract is to free man from the illegitimate binds to which existing governments have shackled him. In the event that this is his point, then it takes after that he has to be most concerned with the safeguarding of flexibility in political society, at first so savage man may be baited out of nature and into society in any case, and a while later so that Rousseau's framework for this general public will keep the present oppression from reasserting itself. “Those who believe themselves the masters of others cease not to be even greater slaves than the people they govern. ”[Rousseau,

Read More
1613 Words | 7 Pages

This perception of government is nothing but a social liberal view of what the government is and should be, ‘mutual communication…preservation of liberty, both civil and political.’ Thus social liberals like Rousseau realize that certain higher goods such as freedom and equal contribution in political activities, freedom from alienation is needed to preserve society and the general will of the

Read More
1827 Words | 8 Pages

Like natural freedom, civil freedom is quite individualistic and low on external restraints (Simpson, p. 48). Here, individuals have the rights and powers to do what they please, as long as the sovereign agrees with their behaviors and does not see them as threatening. Therefore, one can argue that this type of freedom allows individuals to keep their free will to themselves and thereby does not except them to form a collective free will. It becomes clear that all of Rousseau’s freedoms contain a certain amount of order and control; individuals are never fully free. This makes sense as Rousseau’s publication is called On the Social Contract.

Read More
1314 Words | 6 Pages

How does Rousseau conceive the relationship between democracy and freedom? What are the main merits of and problems with his approach? Although the Social Contract promises freedom to the members of the state this freedom does not automatically include democracy. Democracy is suggested as a possible form of government alongside aristocracy and monarchy whereas today it is arguable that democracy is seen as the only form which denotes a free people.

Read More

More about John Locke On Legitimate Government

Related Topics

Open Document