In the opening of Rousseau’s Social Contract - " Man is born free, and yet we see him everywhere in chains." Rousseau apparently gives his social contract is to free man from the illegitimate binds to which existing governments have shackled him. In the event that this is his point, then it takes after that he has to be most concerned with the safeguarding of flexibility in political society, at first so savage man may be baited out of nature and into society in any case, and a while later so that Rousseau's framework for this general public will keep the present oppression from reasserting itself. “Those who believe themselves the masters of others cease not to be even greater slaves than the people they govern.”[Rousseau, …show more content…
No more espionage, no more wars on “terrorism”, or any acts made without a public consent. Greek philosopher Plato took position relatively on both sides(more towards Rousseau). “Says, even if one has every kind of food and drink, lots of money, and every sort of power to rule, life is thought to be not worth living when the body’s nature is ruined.”[Plato, 121] In any case on the off chance that somebody can do whatever he wishes, aside from what sets him free from bad habit and shamefulness and make him obtain equity and goodness, by what method would it be able to worth living when his spirit is demolished by turmoil? As an example we can look at Plato’s Divided Line & a Allegory of the Cave. Like Rousseau’s chains , born into a world where one knows nothing better than raised upon, how does one solve its true perception on reality? It is through the four stages of Plato’s Divided Line. Through imagination, belief, thinking and rational intelligence. (Republic Book VI, 509 – Book VII, 521c). Like Rousseau’s Social Contract, one can fall into a false submission to something to what is thought real. Like the man being chained in a cave with only knowing of shadows and sheer noises. This philosophy