The Right to Revolt
John Locke was an English philosopher and Enlightenment thinker who returned to England from exile in Holland in 1688. Locke’s The Second Treatise on Government was published in 1689, the year after the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The theory of the social contract and individual rights set forth in the treatise offered justification for the revolution and for King William III’s rule. Locke undermined the legitimacy of absolute monarchy with his theory that the sovereign had contractual obligations to his subjects. Locke wrote that men gave up their natural liberties to governments in order to protect their peace and property. In the state of nature, all men were equal because the Maker, or God, was their one and only master.
…show more content…
The government therefore respect the subjects’ right to their property above all. Taxation without the approval of the majority was equal to the government taking property without consent, breaking the contract that it had with the subjects to protect property. Thus, taxation must be approved by the people or their representatives. In England, these representatives formed Parliament. The executive must also respect the legislative, so that sovereigns could not issue edicts that were not sanctioned by the legislative, and all laws had to be imposed through a fair court system that applied them equally to people of all classes. These laws had to be designed for the good of the majority, and the power given to the legislative or executive to make and enforce the laws could not be transferred. Locke argued that an absolute monarch could not rule society because the interests of the monarch did not align with those of the majority. Whereas representatives would eventually join the population and be bound by the same laws and circumstances, monarchs could enrich themselves indefinitely without regard to the majority. In the case of tyrants who overstepped the bounds of the power given to them by the law for their own gains, subjects had the right to take back the power they gave to the sovereign. Those who sought to rule absolutely were violating a fundamental law of nature, as only God had absolute and arbitrary power over men. The society, made up of the subjects who had entered into contract with each other, would then dissolve the government and establish a new one. The dissolution of government would not give individuals power over themselves again, but would give the society and therefore the majority the ability to select new government to