ipl-logo

John Locke Vs Hobbes

1199 Words5 Pages

John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were both 17th century philosophers. Both men studied and graduated successfully albeit from different schools. For both men, the main study was on human nature. Specifically, Nature of Law. In the realm of their nature of law studies is the state of nature, and an unwritten social contract. Locke and Hobbes wrote so eloquently and intelligently that their words are still held in high regard today. However, the study of such a controversial subject that resounds still today gives more questions than answers. One would say that wisdom comes with age and if that is the case, who is closer to the truth with ethical and moral precision: Locke or Hobbes? Having a government is important but the most important way …show more content…

Locke was under the idea that all men are born with the same abilities and can coexist in one area with peace as long as their lives were not in any danger. Whereas Hobbes believed that in a state of nature, a man is always in a state of war. Very simply put in Hobbes’s view, a man may have the ability to do what is right according to their morals, values, and ethics but will not do so simply because they will be greedy and self-seeking of all things. As for Locke, he believed that if man used his God-given ethical “compass”, he could prosper and give back by helping others that require it. In both men’s ideas, there is no actual need of government because it would serve little to no purpose as men would either ignore it or live by it yet fight it. Yet, with one agreement of thought between their theories, more disagreements arise. The state of nature is the thought of a world with or without a government, state, or laws. The nature of law is the theory of how individuals behave whether they agree with Locke or Hobbes as to how it turns out. A social contract is actually an unwritten contract where individuals use their common sense to stay peaceful if you agree with Locke or begin wars based on your needs and wants according to

Show More
Related
110 Words | 1 Pages

Locke wanted a government to protect our natural rights. Hobbes believed that power resided to the Monarch. Locke believed that power resided to the people. Hobbes believed that a government’s power cannot be limited. Locke believed that a government’s power can be limited.

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were early English philosophers who each had very different views on the roles of the government and the people being governed. Their interpretations of human nature each had a lasting and vast impact on modern political science. Locke believed that men had the right to revolt against oppressive government. “‘Being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.”

Read More
1208 Words | 5 Pages

Hobbes’s opinions about politics and government were far different from fellow English philosopher John Locke’s in his document Second Treatise of Government published in 1689. Locke existed during a much later period in Europe, when the Wars of Religion was over and England had established the Glorious Revolution Agreement between Dutch nobility, William and Mary, and Parliament. Due to the different time periods in which Hobbes and Locke lived, their experiences had a major effect on their opinions about government. Hobbes’ Leviathan and Locke’s Second Treatise of Government had different opinions regarding a man’s state of nature and social contract.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

Hobbes and locke were two philosophers who two different ideas on the world and human behavior as a whole. Hobbes mainly believed that without any form of government people will always be trying to fight for power. On the other hand, Locke believed everyone is born peaceful but can be corrupted by society. Hobbes and Locke both had very different views on different human nature, the purpose of government, and both had a big influence on many different countries.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

The Enlightenment: Hobbes vs. Locke Two famous philosophers, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, have contributed to modern political science by expressing their views on human nature and the general laws that man had to follow. Both of their views differed in terms of how man should live his life. These views will be shown by comparing both philosophers’ opinions on the nature of man, and the various laws that constituted. Man was naturally evil, selfish, and living in a state of war, according to Hobbes. He believed that “humans were created “bad” by their creator”, and were “condemned to live in a world where bad things happen” (The Enlightenment, 1650-1789, p. 6).

Read More
1440 Words | 6 Pages

Thomas Hobbes and John locke were both famous philosophers during the enlightenment period. They were social contract theorists and natural law theorists, they both impacted the modern government, modern science, and the world in general tremendously. However that is where the resemblance ends. If one looks more deeply, they will see that these two philosophers actually had very contrasting opinions. Hobbes was more pessimistic about the world whereas Locke had a more optimistic outlook on his surrounding environment.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

As the seventeenth century began, there were many changes yet to come for the world that would shape what it is today. Two political thinkers helped make these changes in the aspect of political thought. Those two thinkers went by the names of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Both of these two men were incredibly smart and knew what they believed. Both of them believed in a centralized government that was chosen by the people so that the people were able to have power also.

Read More
342 Words | 2 Pages

In The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien, the truth is distorted. O’Brien’s writing style cause the readers to question whether the novel is based on the truth or not. The author distorts the point of view, voice, and time for the readers to discerns the truth. Tim O’Brien uses both first and third-person narrative in the novel. Throughout the novel, O’Brien’s perspective is not constant and shifts between first and third-person.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are two theorists known for their views regarding the social contract. Both theorists study the origins of government and the level of authority given to the state over individuals, thoroughly constructing their arguments through the social contract. A philosophical approach was used in both Hobbes’s and Locke’s arguments, however supporting different authorities. Thomas Hobbes advocates for absolutism whilst John Locke advocates for a constitutional government. Through the close examination of the state of nature, the relationships between subject and sovereign and views regarding the social contract, one can observe a more sensible basis for constructing a successful political society.

Read More
1392 Words | 6 Pages

To begin, Locke and Hobbes were two outstanding thinkers who argued in different ways, Hobbes believed in the legitimacy of absolute monarch and Locke believed in a government based on the will of the people being governed. They both represented a growing trend in European society in the 17th and 18th centuries to use reason as the final judgment of things, including the conduct of kings. They contributed to modern political science, and they both had similar views on where power lies in a society. Hobbes has influenced to some degree what can be done to change a government by the people, the contributions Hobbes did led to the foundation of what today is the conservative party. On the other hand, Locke was very influential in shaping modern politics, our current view of human nature, the nature of individual rights, the popular constitutions that exist today and the building blocks of the liberal party.

Read More
844 Words | 4 Pages

Both Locke witnessed the history of their mother country and devised ways to cure the all political systems of the world, with as little bloodshed as possible. Hobbes came before Locke and was considered a founder of political philosophy, as at the time, nobody dwelt on the ideas of government; it was just the divine right of the king to rule because he was god’s chosen man and no questions asked. Though historians like to believe Locke and Hobbes were at each other’s throats with their contrasting ideas, Locke was greatly influenced by the teachings of Hobbes as a fellow political thinker. Though they were not in concurrence with their specific political views, they are both remembered as revolutionary philosophers who changed the way people thought about

Read More
1441 Words | 6 Pages

When comparing the two different accounts of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke we must take into consideration a number of things such as the age in which they lived and the time in which they produced their philosophical writings. We will however find out that these two philosophers actually have a couple of things in which agree on even though most of their opinions clash. On one side we have Thomas Hobbes who lived in the time of the English Civil War (1642-1651) who provides a negative framework for his philosophical opinions in his masterpiece Leviathan and who advocates for philosophical absolutism . On the other side we have John Locke, living during the glorious revolution (1688-1689) he presents a positive attitude in his book The Second Treatise of Government and advocates for philosophical and biblical constitutionalism. It is important that we know that the state of nature describes a pre- political society prior to the social contract.

Read More
1437 Words | 6 Pages

State of Nature is the condition under which men lived prior to the formation of societies which may be considered as an historical fact or a hypothetical claim" (Steele, 1993). That is, the condition that men lived before the formation of legitimate government. Social contract on the other hand, is the hypothesis that one's moral obligations are dependent upon an implicit agreement between individuals to form a society (Celeste, 2004). Both Hobbes and Locke used social contract as a means of explaining their Ideas on the origin

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

There are different views on if driverless cars are a good idea to incorporate into our changing world or if they are a bad idea to take over our lives in day-to-day transportation. To start off, here are some pros about driverless cars. To begin, these cars will, of course, eliminate human error and save many lives not just in the United States but in the world overall. The saved lives number in the United States will be around 37,000 and 1.3 million globally (Strassburger).

Read More
1740 Words | 7 Pages

Hobbes was an English philosopher, known through out the world as the author of “Leviathan” which is regarded as one of the earliest examples of the social contract theory. His writings were greatly influenced by the

Read More

More about John Locke Vs Hobbes

Related Topics

Open Document