John Oliver Analysis

1550 Words7 Pages

John Oliver
My name is Patient Ngembe, and my group partner is Millie. We argue that John Oliver is, in fact, a journalist. John Oliver was born in the 1970s in Birmingham in England. He is a well-known British humourist, political analyst, television host, as well as an irregular actor. He is recognized in the US for hosting various comedies, such as Last Week Tonight with John Oliver as well as The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. He has acted many roles in different comedies. Sometimes, it is hard to distinguish between the comedians and journalists because their roles are similar. Journalists are expected to have particular qualities and demonstrate a certain level of understanding of what they report. They should demonstrate effective communication …show more content…

Those of us who view him as a journalist would like something for the host to commit to certain causes or declare neutrality. They associate him with the particular seriousness of a purpose to accept their role. The reason that makes Oliver decline the title is that he believes that by accepting it his comedy will be killed and along with it his best analysis of information. Using these facts, I think Oliver's credibility as a journalist is more than the most self-identifying journalists. Moreover, Oliver has the power to ridicule, which prompts action from the concerned people. For example, he criticizes the manner in which the church is defined, and his establishment of own religious group proves his approach to ridiculing people because it did not meet the fourteen requirements. John has ever concentrated on doing better, and he discusses complicated policy issues better than TV programs. Continuous improvement is one of the aims of the journalism, whereby their focus is presenting unique news to their viewers. His unique approaches when reporting the news is what draws the attention of his watchers. Bradshaw and Brightwell (2012) assert that news analysis and editorials are journalism, things that Oliver engages in. Evidently, he spends fifteen minutes disputing the pledges of net neutrality, drawing the attention of many