Aidan Kane
Mrs. Phelps
English III ACC
9 January 2023
The Crucible analysis essay
Sometimes it takes the many deaths of people for some to realize what is truly right and wrong. From the years of 1692-1693, there were a series of trials in which people were accused of witchcraft, and if without confession, were sentenced to hang. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller develops John Proctor's conflict with guilt through metaphors and hyperboles, demonstrating how although guilt can destroy a person, taking action to face one’s guilt through sacrifice can help one change for the better by offering a chance at redemption. Through the use of metaphors and hyperboles, Miller develops Proctor’s conflicts with guilt to show how guilt can destroy a person.
…show more content…
Proctor's desire for redemption is fueled by his guilt and may be exemplified throughout several instances of him sacrificing his name, and in the end, his life, when going against the court. Miller writes, “Because I am not worth the dust on the feet of them that hang” (Miller 143). Through Proctor's comparison of his worth to dust, he means to show how guilty he feels that innocent people have been killed as a result of lies and he would be able to save himself with a lie in return, which would then be used to encourage more people to engage in the hysteria. Instead, Proctor stays strong to his name and redeems himself through this sacrifice. Around the same discussion in the novel Miller also states, “I have three children---how may I teach them to walk like men in the world, and I sold my friends?” (Miller 143). Although in reality, Proctor did not sell his friends, he makes this exaggeration to demonstrate to Danforth the guilt he feels and the reasons he needs this redemption. Proctor highlights how his current worth is not as valuable as the man he wants to be as he has let innocent people die and is about to tell a lie which would save his life. He feels incapable of living his life with that guilt and wants to take the opportunity to do the right thing and absolve it through this sacrifice. Subsequently, Miller develops Proctor’s conflicts with guilt to reveal how one can change for the better through their chances at redemption through hyperboles and