ipl-logo

John Searle Dualism Research Paper

1272 Words6 Pages

1. Compare and contrast the views of John Searle and Rene Descartes on dualism.
- John Searle’s view on dualism was called the Supervenience theory. This theory originates from two aspects, both mental and physical that become a single substance. On the other hand, Rene Descartes believed that mental and physical are two different substances called substance dualism. He stated that there is an immaterial essence that is the mind and a material essence, which is the body. These thoughts and feelings are immaterial which means that it exists in the mind and the body exists in the material space.
2. Compare and contrast the views of George Berkeley and Thomas Hobbes on the mind.
- George Berkeley’s view on the mind is that direct access to the …show more content…

Also, believing in God is a wishful thinking, for a desire of protection from a brutal reality. Nietzsche agreed with Freud that God never existed. Basically, if you are a reasonable, intelligent person you could understand, God is a fairy tale used by powerful people to control the weak. By using this thought, people would be scared of doing anything wrong so they won’t sin and pay harsh consequences.

12. Explain and evaluate the views of Tolstoy and Kierkegaard, on the rationality of religious belief.
- Kierkegaard views on religious beliefs are irrational. He stated that truth is subjective and relative making it still possible that God does exist. However, Tolstoy’s view on the subject is that faith is irrational and rational thinking cannot lead you to find the meaning of life. Rational thinking leads you to a better answer to the purpose of life.

13. Explain and evaluate Pascal’s Wager. Would belief based on such an argument get you into heaven?
- When reviewing Pascal Wagner’s theory one could say that it does not guarantee you heaven. According to what I read, it stated that there are a lot of different religions and within those religions they have specific beliefs to follow to be part of their religion. By following those specific beliefs, then it could lead you to the gates of

Show More
Related

Lara Buchak's Can It Be Rational To Have Faith

1347 Words | 6 Pages

In Lara Buchak’s essay, Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? , she asserts that everyday faith statements and religious faith statements share the same attributes. She later states that in order to truly have faith, a person ceases to search for more evidence for their claim, and that having faith can be rational. Although she makes compelling arguments in favor of faith in God, this essay is more hearsay and assumption than actual fact. In this paper, you will see that looking for further evidence would constitute not having faith, but that having faith, at least in the religious sense, is irrational.

Read More

Pascal's Waager Rhetorical Analysis

619 Words | 3 Pages

Argument Against the Argument of Pascal’s Wager In Pascal’s Wager, Pascal pioneered new thoughts and opinions amongst his peers in probability theories by attempting to justify that believing in God is advantageous to one’s personal interest. In this paper, I will argue that Pascal’s argument rationalizing why one should believe in God fails and I will suggest that even if one was to accept Pascal’s wager theory, this will not be a suffice resolution to reap the rewards that God has promised to Christian believers like myself who has chosen to believe in God due to my early childhood teachings, familial and inherited beliefs. Pascal offers a logical reason for believing in God: just as the hypothesis that God's existence is improbable, the

Read More

Gertler's Argument Defends Naturalistic Dualism

524 Words | 3 Pages

Gertler’s argument defends naturalistic dualism. Naturalistic dualism is the idea that the mental state is existentially separate from the physical state. Dualism’s opposing ideology is physicalism. Physicalism is the idea that the mental and physical state are one in the same. Through this she rejects the identity theory which claims that mental states are ultimately identical to states of the brain and/or central nervous system.

Read More

Two Arguments For Dualism By Kripke And Leibniz

316 Words | 2 Pages

There are two arguments for dualism given one by Kripke stating that, conscious states are not identical to brain states. And the other by Leibniz stating that consciousness is not identical to physical workings. Kripke argument refers to the existence of zombies because zombies to do not have a brain but they do have consciousness. Jeen "Gina" Han, 24, dubbed "the evil twin," received the maximum sentence. The brain is in relation to our bodies therefore if the brain and consciousness were identical then zombies would not exist therefore the two are different.

Read More

The Crucible Argumentative Essay

622 Words | 3 Pages

Beliefs seem to be the core of all the unfortunate things going on in the world today. Many extremists try to force their religion on others with violence, and it is becoming a problem. Many people tend to use religion to their advantage to gain power. On the other hand religion can be used to help individuals through hard times and to gain salvation. Overall, the positive aspects of religion outweigh the negative aspects.

Read More

Nietzsche's 'The Parable Of The Madman'

418 Words | 2 Pages

This goes to show how much religion influences one’s lifestyle where it might even hold people

Read More

Wk Clifford The Ethics Of Belief

228 Words | 1 Pages

The Ethics of Belief is a argument against Pascalian Wagers written by the British philosopher W. K. Clifford. In his essay, he writes that holding beliefs involves ethical principles, and that we are morally wrong if we hold beliefs without sufficient evidence to support them. In Clifford’s first illustration, he describes the story of a ship-owner. The ship-owner is in possession of a ship he suspects to be unfit for sail, but pushes asides his doubts for the belief that Providence will care for his ship, and sends it out to sea. Whether or not the ship succeeds in it’s journey, the ship-owner’s choice to push aside his doubts was morally wrong.

Read More

Sigmund Freud Vs Lewis

1371 Words | 6 Pages

One of Freud’s primary arguments to disprove the existence of God was based on the premise that religious beliefs were formed from wishful thinking and that God is simply a representation of parental authority. In this case, Freud believes that since children think of their parents as superheroes, they create God as an image of their parents.6 While this analysis does seem relatively reasonable, God is actually even more understanding and compassionate than parents are and he longs to be with us. Therefore, God simply cannot be just a representation of parents. Believing in God is also not wishful thinking because as Lewis points out, living a religious life involves a great deal of despair. When someone believes in God, they learn there is always room for improvement within themselves, which for most people can be hard to accept.

Read More

Descartes Sixth Meditation Analysis

1919 Words | 8 Pages

Conclusion: The mind is substantively different from the body and indeed matter in general. Because in this conception the mind is substantively distinct from the body it becomes plausible for us to doubt the intuitive connection between mind and body. Indeed there are many aspects of the external world that do not appear to have minds and yet appear none the less real in spite of this for example mountains, sticks or lamps, given this we can begin to rationalize that perhaps minds can exist without bodies, and we only lack the capacity to perceive them.

Read More

Pascal's Wager Argument Analysis

1127 Words | 5 Pages

From Pascal’s perspective, the only right choice to make is “wager then, without hesitation, that He does exist” (Pascal). Although Pascal argues that believing in God is the most reasonable decision, there are objections against his argument. The “different practices” objection and the “utility of salvation cannot be infinite” objection will be analyzed according to Pascal’s Wager. Utter repetition of religious acts does not give an individual rational justification to believe in God. Pascal starts by mentioning that God's existence or nonexistence cannot be determined with reason; it cannot be proven, but a individual must “convince [himself], not by piling up proofs of God, but by subduing [his] passions” to believe in God (Pascal).

Read More

Analysis Of The Will To Believe By William James

1107 Words | 5 Pages

Clifford then says that we must judge people’s actions that their beliefs fuel (par. 6). Next, Clifford goes on to say that every belief someone holds is important as it affirms other beliefs and it influences a person’s actions regardless when the action might happen (par. 8). Clifford also explains that every man’s belief affects every other person (par. 9). Clifford states that humans want to believe we know the truth because we find comfort in it and that we are afraid of being wrong because we feel powerless (par. 13).

Read More

Hobbes Vs Berkeley

395 Words | 2 Pages

However, for Berkeley materialist philosophers, such as Hobbes, to him left no room for god. Berkley instead expanded on the metaphysical claim of Idealism. Berkeley held the view that all we know about in the world are our sensations. As a matter of

Read More

Aristotle Dualism Essay

526 Words | 3 Pages

He argues that the body and soul are two elements that have the same underlying substance. He maintains that a person’s soul is the same as his nature of body; however, he argues that the mind differed from other parts of the body as it lacked a physical feature. In this case, he maintains that the intellect lacks a physical form, and this allows it to receive every form. It allows a person to think about anything, including the material object. In this case, he argues that if the intellect were in a material form, it could be sensitive to only some physical objects.

Read More

Essay On Cartesian Dualism

703 Words | 3 Pages

This paper will critically examine the Cartesian dualist position and the notion that it can offer a plausible account of the mind and body. Proposed criticisms deal with both the logical and empirical conceivability of dualist assertions, their incompatibility with physical truths, and the reducibility of the position to absurdity. Cartesian Dualism, or substance dualism, is a metaphysical position which maintains that the mind and body consist in two separate and ontologically distinct substances. On this view, the mind is understood to be an essentially thinking substance with no spatial extension; whereas the body is a physical, non-thinking substance extended in space. Though they share no common properties, substance dualists maintain

Read More

Essay On Dualism And Monism

1457 Words | 6 Pages

I will explore this question by looking at how this question has developed into two key schools of thought: Dualism and Monism. Dualism states that the mind is not physical and exists separately while Monism states that the mind and body are not separate. There are arguments for both theories and these dichotomous ideas have brought to light the mind-body problem, which I will analyse below. There are sub-forms of both schools of thought and one of the key sub-schools of thought under Dualism which I will discuss is Interactionism; that the mind and body are separate but both influence each other The Mind-Body Debate Rene Decartes believed that the mind

Read More

More about John Searle Dualism Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document