More handpicked essays just for you.
John Stuart Mill's principle of utility
Evidence of motivation in the pursuit of happyness
John Stuart Mill's principle of utility
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Defense of Utilitarianism, J.S. Mill In the excerpt from John Stuart Mill’s book, Utilitarianism, Mill defends the utilitarian theory against three different objections. The first, and strongest opposition to utilitarianism was the accusation that the emphasis on the pursuit of pleasure makes utilitarianism “a doctrine worthy of swine.” This was my favorite argument because Mill defended it so well stating that there are varying degrees of pleasure. He refers to them as “high” and “low” pleasures, which I do agree with.
Whether it is at the dinner table or in my family’s group text message, the conversation about my brother’s custody battle with my mother’s side of the family seems to remain a bitter topic, especially when discussing my role in it. When my father physically harmed my brother to the extent to which he had to go to the emergency room, the custody trial over my brother and me began. After several sources provided the judge with accusations against my father, I was the final source that needed to assert or deny my father’s abuse; with heavy consideration, I decided to lie to the judge by denying my father’s abuse. Under the principle of utilitarianism, philosophers would infer that lying is permissible if the consequences of doing so are good.
John Stuart Mills believes that America & the rest of the world should stop pushing for happiness. John Stuart tells America that more than half who's trying to pursue happiness are usually still on the same road they were on the previous year. In this argument I will show you why John Stuart Mills and I argue about this situation. I agree with John Stuart Mills argument that we should not search for happiness. One example A man named Carlyle was notoriously cranky, but his central insight- that happiness would raise expectations that could never possibly be fulfilled.
I think I will divert the train to the right killing one person because one person is less important than five. Sometimes it is important to do what is right than what is morally good to do. The utilitarianism is a moral theory that gives happiness to the number of people in the society and it has been considered greatness, an action is morally appropriate if its outcomes lead to happiness and wrong if it results in sadness. I will begin by describing what Mill might do in the Trolley situation. Next, I will contrast what Kant might do in this situation and lastly, I will be also going to give my opinion on this Trolley situation.
Pursuit of Happiness essay! John Stuart Mill’s argument is to let happiness come on its own way, without dwelling on it or thinking about it. I indeed agree with his argument, but i also disagree with couple of his statements in his prompt. In my opinion happiness comes in varies of way but in order to truly have it you must wait for it to come in the right time, but also work for it.
Joseph Apodaca Professor Carol Enns Philosophy 5 February 21, 2018 Analysis Paper All families can demand a lot from us. Naturally, they expect love, attention, and support. But sometimes, they also ask for things that I’m for more tangible, like money. Most of us are fairly generous people, and want to help a family member or friend when we can.
Let’s say there is a woman with no children who, based on her religious beliefs, does not seek medical care for herself, her family, or her friends. How would Mill response to her life and her philosophy?As Mill has insisted to give complete freedom, he would not blame her life at the first moment. However, he would ask about the reason behind her actions. Mill does not criticize, people having a religion and going into the religion in depth.
John Stuart Mill wrote that we cannot call God good for he is a perfect being and the word ‘good’ is a word that describes the highest form of human morality. I believe this statement to be true in a sense. Good is a term that has a relative meaning when describing things. Good is from a perspective of the individual. In this paper I will be arguing that the word ‘good’ in the phrase “God is good” is in relation to the opinion of the person describing God, and that it cannot be known to our reality if God is objectively good.
Motivation. It is a powerful force that pushes humans in their everyday lives to always try our hardest and allows us to focus on the abundance of goals we desire to achieve throughout life. It also enables us to be the sentient and moral human beings that we see ourselves as today. With that said, is motivation always relevant to morality? Are we nothing but immature and incapable living things without motivation?
I chose to review the fifth chapter of “New Ideas From Dead Economists” titled The Stormy Mind of John Stuart Mill. John Stuart Mill was born in 1806 in London to two strict parents who began to educate their son at a very young age. Mill’s father was James Mill, a famous historian and economist, who began to teach his son Greek at the age of three. The book reports that “by eight, the boy had read Plato, Xenophon, and Diogenes” and by twelve “Mill exhausted well-stocked libraries, reading Aristotle and Aristophanes and mastering calculus and geometry” (Buchholz 93). The vast amount of knowledge that Mill gained at a young age no doubt assisted him in becoming such a well-recognized philosopher and economist.
As a child, most learn that sharing is caring. Giving something that is abundant to the individual to those who could benefit from it is a concept as old as civilization. Naturally, as humans, we seek to be happy and more often than not, make others happy. Thus the utilitarian view was created, but what does that mean? What exactly is happiness and how does one go about spreading happiness it to others?
Finally, in the fourth section, I conclude that this rejoinder is unsuccessful. According to Desire Satisfactionism, one’s well-being increases when one’s desire is satisfied and conversely one’s well-being decreases when one’s desire is frustrated. The theory only takes into account satisfying intrinsic desires to increase one’s well-being. It is also important to note that any knowledge or feelings of satisfaction here is not essential to the desire being satisfied (Lukas, 2010 pp.3).
(Mill, utilitarianism, p.697) To put this into simpler terms, Mill is essentially saying events or experiences are desirable only when it is a source for pleasure, so actions are good when they lead to higher levels of general happiness and they are deemed as bad when it lowers your general level of happiness. However, it is important to note utilitarianism doesn’t say it is morally right for everyone to purse what make them alone happy but instead morality is dictated by what increases the total amount of utility in the world. Pursuing your own happiness at the expense of the majority of social happiness would be viewed as wrong by utilitarian’s. Mill then proceeded to say that morality requires impartial consideration of the interest of everyone involved, its not just about your own happiness.
Being Free 1st draft Freedom is word used in a lot of contexts, but the official meaning of the word is “the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants” (Freedom). Meaning that you have the right to do something, with the focus being on you as an individual. This means no one can tell you what to do, like for example a state. This is an important aspect and part of political theory. Liberty is also used and viewed as the same category of theory, and has the definition “The state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s behavior or political views” (Liberty).
Defining philosophy is an open-ended question; however, we as humans can only attempt to perceive its meaning and unlock perceived views of the meaning of life. This paper is a perspective of philosophy through the affiliation of happiness. The Buddha defines philosophy as "a way of thinking about the world, or a way of leading a more ethical life? Or is it a kind of psychotherapy - a way of helping us come terms with ourselves and with dilemmas that life constantly throws at us?
