ipl-logo

John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism Is A Valid System

707 Words3 Pages

Validity of a system is understood by fact. This can be best demonstrated through a mathematical example. If a math teacher and I are discussing an equation or a problem and they discern that the best way to solve this equation or problem is through a unfactual means of solving the problem, then they are wrong. Facts are what validate something and so John Stuart Mill uses facts to prove that Utilitarianism is a valid system. However, every idea will have a hole in it’s explanation and there are arguments in philosophy that can call for “what if” cases but in general Mill proves this validity in a simplistic manner. John Stuart Mill says that happiness is what we all strive for and because of this then that must mean Utilitarianism is true. …show more content…

Mill explains that Utilitarianism is a valid system by explaining that since happiness is the goal and the ends, in which, that is what we strive for, then since we desire the happiness it must mean that it's certain to be true. In other words, since we all want happiness and Utilitarianism is the philosophy on why we strive for happiness then that must mean that Utilitarianism is true. “No reason can be given why the general happiness is desirable, except that each person, so far as he believes it to be attainable, desires his own happiness.” (Page 35) One of the main principles of Utilitarianism is to avoid pain and pursue pleasure but how do you do that? Through trying to become happy. No matter who you are, everyone with human nature seeks out happiness by avoiding pain and pursuing pleasure and that everyone embraces this principle throughout their daily lives. No one lives to get dealt pain, instead they strive for pleasure. They work so they can eat, they take showers so they can feel good, they listen to music because it makes them happy, and etc. Pursuing pain is against human reason according to Mill and does not serve a

Show More
Related

Who Is John Stuart Mill In Defense Of Utilitarianism

240 Words | 1 Pages

In Defense of Utilitarianism, J.S. Mill In the excerpt from John Stuart Mill’s book, Utilitarianism, Mill defends the utilitarian theory against three different objections. The first, and strongest opposition to utilitarianism was the accusation that the emphasis on the pursuit of pleasure makes utilitarianism “a doctrine worthy of swine.” This was my favorite argument because Mill defended it so well stating that there are varying degrees of pleasure. He refers to them as “high” and “low” pleasures, which I do agree with.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Obamacare

599 Words | 3 Pages

John Stuart Mill, one of the most influential philosopher of the nineteenth century, created a principle that states “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness”. This is known as the Greatest Happiness Principle which focuses on what a man ought to do to promote happiness and prevention of unhappiness. When it comes to consequences in utilitarianism, this is what categorizes an action under “right” or “wrong”. Mill’s definition of happiness is based on the amount of pain and pleasure present in the consequence of the action. Happiness is the intended pleasure and absence of pain whereas unhappiness is pain and the deprivation of

Read More

Theory Of Utilitarianism And Drinking Age

1533 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focuses on outcomes and consequences. When one considers the theory of utilitarianism, it must be understood that the pleasure is a fundamental moral good and the aim is to maximize pleasure and minimize pain. So, when a human is going through the decision making process it is of the utmost importance to look forward at the consequences of the decision and determine if the decision will maximize pleasure and minimize pain. John Stuart Mill, a nineteenth century philosopher focused on the theory of utilitarianism or the Greatest Happiness Principle and claimed that the maximization of happiness for the greatest quantity of people is the ultimate goal. One issue that we face in modern day America that

Read More

Comparing Mill And Kant's Theories

714 Words | 3 Pages

Mill describes utilitarianism like a hypothesis depend on the basis that if people tend to behave like promoting happiness, it would be a true

Read More

Mill's Argument For Utilitarianism

733 Words | 3 Pages

When Mill is first starting to talk about utilitarianism he starts by replying to the misconceptions about it. He says that most people think that utilitarianism is the opposition to pleasure, when in reality utilitarianism is defined as pleasure itself minus pain. Some people now refer to utilitarianism as the greatest happiness principle, “actions are

Read More

John Stuart Mill Happiness Is Better Than Lower Pleasures

933 Words | 4 Pages

I will agree with Mill and argue that higher pleasures are better than lower pleasures. In Mill’s essay, he defines Utilitarianism: ‘’actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure’’ (Mill, 7). Therefore, Utilitarianism according to Mill considers actions to be right or wrong based on whether or not they make humans happy.

Read More

Utilitarianism: The Greatest Happiness Principle

477 Words | 2 Pages

I personally strongly disagree with Utilitarianism in general, and especially with the Greatest Happiness principle. Personally I think many things are wrong with it, including the fact that people can’t see the future and determine the consequences of their actions, the fact that it allows immoral behavior in the name of increasing overall happiness, that it allows for government laws to be broken in order to increase overall happiness, and the way it disregards the motive behind an action. In theory it sounds like it would be a fair and moral ethical principle because it promotes the good of the majority, but when broken down I think the Greatest Happiness Principle has major flaws. The Greatest Happiness Principle is Mill's notion that any action that endorses happiness and/or the absence of pain is good or right.

Read More

Comparison Of Utilitarianism And The Greatest Happiness Principle

629 Words | 3 Pages

Utilitarianism and The Greatest Happiness Principle Utilitarianism is grounded in the reality that all desires we have boil down to pleasure, and freedom from pain. All other things we desire, are extensions of these base desires. As John Stuart Mill states in his book entitled "Utilitarianism;" "The only proof capable of being given that an object is visible, is that people actually see it. The only proof that a sound is audible, is that people hear it... In like manner, I apprehend, the sole evidence it is possible to produce that anything is desirable, is that people do actually desire it."

Read More

How Is Utilitarianism Valid

1020 Words | 5 Pages

Utilitarianism will always be valid because any man, attains results. According to Ki su Kim in John Stuart Mill's Concepts Of Quality And Pedagogical Norms goes on to say “seek a stimulus if it was pleasant, to avoid it if unpleasant ...his natural response was thought to be essential to the preservation of human existence... each person must be allowed to pursue pleasure; happiness could be promised only thereby.” Utilitarianism is valid because it gives us conduct to our behavior. For the principle existence of our lives is based seeking pleasure and avoiding displeasure..

Read More

Essay On Divine Command Theory

1218 Words | 5 Pages

The main principle of utilitarianism is happiness. People who follow this theory strive to fulfill the “ultimate good”. The “ultimate good” is defined as ultimate pleasure with out any pain. It is said that the pleasure can be of any quantity and any quality, but pleasures that are weighted more important are put at a higher level than others that are below it. This ethical theory also states that if society would fully embrace utilitarianism then people would naturally realize their moral standing in the

Read More

John Stuart Mill On Happiness Essay

852 Words | 4 Pages

A man by the name of John Stuart Mill seems to be able to give us some answers to these questions. Mill starts our inquiring journey with defining what utilitarianism stands for. In short he states that it is the construction of utility, which claims that the actions that stimulate happiness in is morally fit and vice versa to be unfit. Happiness is something that we want for

Read More

Categorical Moral Reasoning

1005 Words | 5 Pages

What Mill means by utilitarianism is giving the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people. According to Sandel's lecture Mill's utilitarianism uses consequentialist reasoning. Categorical means absolute for example, if someone asks you if you are hungry a you say,"no",

Read More

Critical Analysis Of John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

1564 Words | 7 Pages

John Stuart Mill, at the very beginning of chapter 2 entitled “what is utilitarianism”. starts off by explaining to the readers what utility is, Utility is defined as pleasure itself, and the absence of pain. This leads us to another name for utility which is the greatest happiness principle. Mill claims that “actions are right in proportions as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” “By Happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain, by happiness, pain and the privation of pleasure”.

Read More

The Concepts Of Traditional Moralism And Traditional Utilitarianism

1162 Words | 5 Pages

Traditional Utilitarianism was generally considered to be founded by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Utilitarian principles assumes that we can measure and add together the quantities of benefits made by a certain action and then measure and subtract from those benefits the quantities of harm the action will produce. Utilitarian principles states that the right act in a given situation is the one that produces the greatest utilities than another act. The act will only be right if it produces the most utility for all the persons affected by the action, including the person who performed the act. It also states, that not only direct and immediate consequences must be taken into consideration, but also all foreseeable future cost and benefits each alternative will have on each individual.

Read More

The Limitations Of John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

996 Words | 4 Pages

This states that whichever action allows for the highest level of welfare for individuals is what should be done. Mill continues this idea by proposing that actions that produce a higher level of pleasure should be chosen, though this pleasure may not be for the individual acting, but rather for others affected by the action. For example, while intoxication through the consumption of alcoholic beverages may be enjoyable, it would be better for an individual to instead spend that time volunteering at a kitchen to help feed the homeless. While one may prefer the former, the latter would bring about the greatest amount of pleasure. Simply put, utilitarianism is the greatest good for the greatest number, employing utility and providing its name.

Read More

More about John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism Is A Valid System

Related Topics

Open Document