ipl-logo

John Terry's Case Study

462 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Terry vs ohio stop & frisk

On October 31,1963 John Terry and two other men who were walking out of a store and a police officer Martin McFadden stop them. McFadden suspected them of robbing at a store and having concealed weapons. They were taken to the police station and was charged with carrying concealed weapons. According to McFadden the two men behaved in a suspicious manner when he was questioning them about the weapons which leads to the cause of the pat down searches. Richard Chilton could have possibly defended Terry about the concealed weapons just to prove to the court on how it started. The court argued on Terry’s case and on McFadden’s case to hear both sides about the weapons and conducting the pat down searches as not a violation from the …show more content…

This case was argued on December of 1967 and decided on June 10, 1968. Terry’s case argued that it was a violation to his constitutional rights and protections due to the search. However, it was determined if is McFadden had broken the Fourth Amendment

Show More
Related

The United States V. Place 462 US Case Brief

510 Words | 3 Pages

696, 709] suspect 's custody, we think the limitations applicable to investigative detentions of the person should define the permissible scope of an investigative detention of the person 's luggage on less than probable cause. Under this standard, it is clear that the police conduct here exceeded the permissible limits of a Terry-type investigative stop.” “In these respects, the canine sniff is sui generis. We are aware of no other investigative procedure that is so limited both in the manner in which the information is obtained and in the content of the information revealed by the procedure.”

Read More

Supreme Court Case: The Case Of Mapp Vs. Ohio

354 Words | 2 Pages

The case of Mapp vs. Ohio is a case of illegal search and seizure. It went to the Supreme Court in 1961. It is important to today’s society because it might mean the difference between guilty and innocent. I agree with the Supreme Court because it is illegal to access private property without a warrant or consent. The case lasted until June 19, 1961.

Read More

Commonwealth V. Newman Case Study

157 Words | 1 Pages

In Commonwealth v. Newman, 429 PA. 441 (1968), on November 16, 1964, at about 11:30 a.m. four detectives went to appellant 's home with a body warrant for appellant and a search warrant for the premises. The complaint for the search warrant recited that the affiant, Detective John McCrory, deposed that there was probable cause to believe that certain books, papers, and other items used for the purpose of a lottery were in the possession of Henderson Newman at or near 721 West Mary Street. They forcefully entered the appellant 's home without announcement or purpose. The court held that, the forcible entry without announcement of purpose violates the Fourth Amendment. The fruits of an illegal search are inadmissible under Mapp v. Ohio,

Read More

Exclusionary Rule In The Weeks V. United States Case

475 Words | 2 Pages

The Weeks v United States case was the Supreme Court basis in determining to incorporate the Fourth Amendment into the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause and apply the exclusionary rule in state cases. In this essay, I am going to discuss the reason why the Supreme Court determine that the exclusionary rule should apply to the state police activity. Prior to the case of Weeks v United States, the state police activity “were not limited in their conduct by the Fourth Amendment” (Ingram p.81) and the exclusionary rule of Fourth Amendments illegal search and seizure only applies to federal law enforcement officers. Basically, it means that state law enforcement officials can illegally search and seized criminal activity evidence and court don’t prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in the trial court.

Read More

Summary: The Case Of Freemont Weeks V. United States

1396 Words | 6 Pages

In June 1968 the United States Supreme Court affirmed that the conviction allows police officers to interrogate and frisk suspicious individuals.(Chief Justice Warren) Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1

Read More

Supreme Court Case Of Timothy Carpenter

1800 Words | 8 Pages

Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cellphone records revealing the location and movements of a cellphone user of the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment? Facts: In April 2011, a group of four men were arrested for a series of armed robberies in Michigan and Ohio. One of the four men confessed to the crimes, and he gave the FBI his number along with the number of everyone else involved in the crime. One of the people convicted in the crime was Timothy Carpenter.

Read More

Kansas City Police Officer Research Paper

611 Words | 3 Pages

Three Kansas City police score unit officer’s Jeffrey M. Bell, Dustin Sillings, and Darryl M. Forrest were charged with theft of federal government property, conspiracy against rights and deprivation of rights under color of the law. The Kansas City police officer were caught by FBI (Federal bureau of Investigation). The Kansas City police officers stole several items and cash in a house that had surveillance cameras during a staged sting operation. The type of situation always makes people wonder what would make these people want to do something like this? Why would the officers discarded their commitment to the city to protect and serve as they swore to do so?

Read More

Arizona Vs Gant Case Study

860 Words | 4 Pages

____, 2009 U.S. Lexis 3120 (2009) , used the standards outlined in Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357, 88 S. Ct. 507, 19 L. Ed. 2d 576 (1967) which states “searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment – subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.” The court also used Weeks v. United States 232 U.S. 383, 392, 34 S. Ct. 341, 58 L. Ed. 652, T.D. 1964 (1914), which states that a search incident to an arrest is among one of the exceptions to the warrant requirement.

Read More

Wolf V. Colorado Case Brief

584 Words | 3 Pages

The police violated Wolf’s rights and since there was no warrant for arrest or warrant to search his office the police was trespassing. The police officer who violated his rights was to be punished by his superiors. The judges decided that using such evidence goes completely against the Fourth Amendment which is a basic need to our freedom. States should follow this law but are not directly forced to. States using evidence that should be excluded in their “statute becomes a form, and its protection an illusion,”(Wolf v Colorado, 1949).

Read More

Comparison Between Earl Warren And William Winquist

1604 Words | 7 Pages

After being reviewed, the Court ruled that the search was not in violation of the Fourth Amendment. They said that “the realities of the workplace” did not give him the same privacy of being in his own home. It states that an individual’s workspace can be searched because it’s the safety of the workplace and the space is property of the business, not the employee. (O'Connor v. Ortega, n.d.).

Read More

Mapp Vs Ohio Case Study

1872 Words | 8 Pages

41. Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The Supreme Court ruling that decided that the fourth amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures must be extended to the states. If there is no probable cause or search warrant issued legally, the evidence found unconstitutionally will be inadmissible in the courtroom and not even considered when pressing charges. The exclusionary rule, in this case, is a right that will restrict the states and not just the federal government, including the states in more of the federal rights as outlined in the Constitution.

Read More

Griswold Vs Connecticut Essay

573 Words | 3 Pages

Justice Douglas’s main argument in his decision of the Griswold v. Connecticut case is the state has intruded on personal privacy with the violation for due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the First Amendment, and the Bill of Rights. This is supported when Douglas states “It is not the breaking of his doors, and the rummaging of his drawers, that constitutes the

Read More

Power Of The Federal Government In The 19th Century

674 Words | 3 Pages

As the country started to grow, the power of the Federal Government had also started to grow. The power that the Federal Government had, started to create conflict between the States ' and the Federal Government. By the 19th century, cases started to appear more frequently that challenged States ' rights against the National Government. Around the early 1800s, the major national concern was finical stability. The charter of the Bank of the United States had expired in 1811 and the Democratic-Republican Madison administration and the Republican Congress had failed to renew it.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment

427 Words | 2 Pages

The Verdict discussed how both cases were attempting to suppress evidence from their cell phones which now contain much more information than they once did. Cases like this continue to shape our rights. The fourth amendment is here to protect ourselves from being incriminated. In modern day the fourth amendment is in question due to new technology.

Read More

Probable Cause In Law

1385 Words | 6 Pages

Colorado (1949). The case details here state that Julius Wolf (the “petitioner”) was convicted by a State court of conspiring to commit abortions based upon evidence allegedly obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment’s search and seizure clause ("Case Brief Wolf v. Colorado," 1949, para. 1). In this case though, the question that was brought forth was, if the states required to exclude illegally seized evidence from trial under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments ("Case Brief Wolf v. Colorado," 1949, para. 1).The case argument was that if evidence was seized illegally in violation of the fourth amendment’s protection, does that violation clearly impede the rights protected under due process, which is the fourteenth amendment. No, due process is not denied when evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure is admitted by a State court for a State offense.

Read More

More about John Terry's Case Study

Open Document