Judicial Bias Against Dads: A Case Study

731 Words3 Pages

Insight on the different generalized views of an everlasting battle between 2 genders. To understand the other side, and the obstacles they had to overcome. Coming down to the after math of achieved results, and its effect on the opposite side. Some may wonder will there ever be a middle ground, and if there was, are we willing to put our differences aside, and seek peace. Justice, versus privilege.

It’s safe to same that we don’t live in a world that has been entirely fare to all. Granted we are populate at 7.12 billion people split into 2 genders, Male and Female. Throughout American history we have had many minority groups that came from a suppressive way of life and has overcome many battles and still ongoing trials today. Marth, Rampton. (October 25,2015). The 4 waves of feminism, University of Oregon. Women have been fighting for their …show more content…

National Parents Organization. Has detailed information stating that the judicial system claims the final decisions under child custody laws are not bias but is in fact based on neutral categories. Robert claims “we’re told that the reason fathers so rarely get custody, or meaningful time with their kids is that they don’t deserve it because they’ve only earned the money to keep the family housed, fed, and clothed. That we’re given to understand, isn’t as important as changing diapers, feeding and bathing the child.”
Mayo Clinic Staff. (March 1,2017.) Domestic Violence Against Men: Know the signs) studies show multiple categories and examples of domestic violence against men such as women trying to control how you spend your money, acts of jealousy or possessive or constantly accuses you of being unfaithful, name calling to put you down, blame for his or her violent behavior.
There are many more subjects on the topic and many debates made. MRAs Are trying to get the fathers in the homes again and not let the government replace the man, and play