ipl-logo

Ideology In Criminal Justice

760 Words4 Pages

When faced with the question of what’s the proper role of a federal judge or even the role of the federal judiciary, many nominees to the exalted position of supreme court justices have answered in these words or along the lines of these same words, “To interpret and to apply the law.” While this reply is apt and shows that the nominee has a clear understanding of the limited role of the judiciary, it is also essential to note that the individual beliefs of the nominee can often time have a significant influence on how he or she will decide on cases once seated on the bench. Therefore, it is pertinent that authorities with the responsibility of appointing and confirming these nominees consider their ideology during confirmation hearings. But …show more content…

“Ideology” in this case refers to the personal views and or opinions of a judicial nominee that may likely influence his or her decisions as a judge. Some of the points under consideration include the individual’s philosophy of constitutional interpretation of points of law, the individual’s views on current controversies and topical issues such as gay rights, the death penalty, the right to abortion, affirmative action, criminal law reform and the separation of the church and state, …show more content…

This is not to say that judges do not operate under the legal boundaries as set by the constitution, but some have argued that since the discretionary powers of judges and Supreme Court judges, in this case, can significantly affect the outcome of any judicial decision, then their ideology and personal philosophy is quite important especially when they would be voting on significant cases.
Finally, both sides of the divide recognize the importance, and role ideology plays in the major legal decisions. Ideology matters and a person’s thinking is bound to influence the way they will vote on important issues, and this is why interest groups on both sides of the ideological divide have strong reasons for making judicial confirmation a high priority because they know what is at stake in who occupies the federal bench.
Lawrence H. Tribe. God Save This Honourable Court, 87, 90 – 91 (1985).
Sydney M. Irmas. Ideology and The Selection of Federal Judges (2002).
Boyden Gray. Appointment of Federal Judges: Should Political Ideology Matter, The Progressive Conservative, Volume V, Issue #128, August 27,

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Gideon V. Wainwright

1023 Words | 5 Pages

When people think of how government works, unless they’ve taken a government class, they usually think of Congress making laws and the President doing pretty much everything else. No one pays much attention to the Supreme Court unless there is a landmark case or something else to grab the news — like the recent death of Justice Antonin Scalia. But the Supreme Court does much more than you’d think regarding keeping the political machine running like a well-oiled … machine. Through not only interpretation of the law, but also judicial activism, the Supreme Court shows it can have as much influence over the laws of the land as either of the other branches of the federal government. In this paper, I will analyze the decision-making methods of the Court using the cases of Gideon v. Wainwright and Betts v. Brady.

Read More

Segal And Spaeth's Argument Analysis

1314 Words | 6 Pages

In regards to the detailed studies of both Segal and Spaeth, and Brenan and Stier, valid points had been made for both sides of the argument. The question posed is rather or not stare decisis still exist in the courts rulings today. Segal and Spaeth analyze the rulings of dissenting judges of landmark cases since the start of the Warren Court while excluding cases with unanimous decisions and cases without progeny within the legal period. The areas of which they dissected and constructed the particular datasets for analyzing is superb as it specifically narrows down the specific information there looking for within their results. The findings from there assessments concluded that precedent did not play a overwhelming role in the sub sequential

Read More

How Does This Chapter Support Toobin's Overall Point Of The Supreme Court

1331 Words | 6 Pages

Chapter 1 Thesis: The decisions that the supreme court makes helps define the United States, so to help gain political advantage the president uses thought and strategy when appointing. Evidence pg 14

Read More

Compare And Contrast Meese And Brennan

181 Words | 1 Pages

Justice William Brennan and Attorney General Edwin Meese held different views on the interpretation of the Constitution when it came to ruling in a case. Brennan held the view that judicial review should be done constitutionally, but to keep human dignity in mind when ruling in a case. Brennan makes his opinion on the matter known saying, “The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights solemnly committed the United States to be a country where the dignity and rights of all persons were equal before all authority.” (Brennan). Unlike Brennan, Meese believed in sticking strictly to what the constitution stated for most matters.

Read More

Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'

710 Words | 3 Pages

Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Litmus Tests For Potential Appellate Judges

787 Words | 4 Pages

The concerns that Senators have about federal appeals court nominees is unjust and unneeded. The only people in the court system who have the ability to overturn laws of legislation and policy are Supreme Court Judges, so it is wrong to subject appeals court nominees to strict ideological tests that the Justices are given. The Justices are the only people who can overturn or rule things unconstitutional, whether it is from cases, executive orders, or when the bureaucracy overstep its’ bounds. It does not matter what an appeals court nominees personal opinion is on a case, because he or she will be following the precedent already set up by the Supreme Court. It does not matter what the nominees opinion is on Roe v. Wade, because as an appellate

Read More

Oliphant's Opaque Opinion Summary

587 Words | 3 Pages

Oliphant analyzes the delicate balance of choosing political sides as compared to strictly upholding the law. Moreover, intertwined throughout the article, Oliphant records predications for the future of the court. For example, he outlines the potential implications if Romney were to have been elected in the 2012 November presidential race. Oliphant appeals to the reputation of Chief Justice Roberts ' historical appointment, voting history, forecasted impact on the bench, and implied influences by political parties and media, in order to establish Roberts ' credibility, despite a reputation inconsistent with his judiciary colleagues. Oliphants sinuous article, "Tipping the Scales" institutes that readers will arrive at one of two conclusions: Chief Justice Roberts 's decisions are unreliable or his actions are justified based on his

Read More

How Did John Marshall Become The Head Of The Supreme Court?

1043 Words | 5 Pages

John Marshall was born in 1756 and grew up near Germantown, Virginia. He was homeschooled by his mother and lived an unassuming life before deciding to fight in the Revolutionary War when he turned 20. Marshall became an officer in the Continental Army befriending General George Washington. He left the military to study law in 1780, eventually becoming the head of the Supreme Court. John Marshall’s work in the Supreme Court instituted new principles such as final interpretation of the constitution, the grandfather principle, and the process of judicial review into the the parameters of the Judicial Branch’s abilities.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods

462 Words | 2 Pages

When people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.

Read More

Texas Judicial Selection Process Essay

828 Words | 4 Pages

In Texas, the selection of judges and the types of judicial selection processes used in the United States are crucial aspects of the legal system that impact the judiciary’s independence and accountability. Understanding the laws of the selection of judges in Texas and the various methods used across the U.S. provides knowledge about how judges are appointed or elected. This paper will include Texas law regarding the selection of most judges in Texas, the types of judicial selection processes used in the U.S., which selection is the best, and what I would do to engage the political process in Texas to pursue my position. The current Texas laws regarding the selection of judges are partisan elections and merit-based selection. Partisan elections involve judicial candidates running for office with a party label, for example,

Read More

Essay On Dynamic Court

1274 Words | 6 Pages

The United States Supreme Court was created by our Founders without many enumerated powers. Through legislation and precedent, the Supreme Court’s duties became apparent to the people and the other governing bodies. From judicial review to understanding unstated fundamental rights, the Supreme Court has furthered the American people’s understanding of our founding document, the Constitution. However, when it comes to the social climate of the United States can the Court dramatically change the people’s social views? There are two ways that the courts have been seen in allowing or impeding social change to be decided by the Courts.

Read More

Essay On Texas Judges

942 Words | 4 Pages

When you think about the word legal, equity rings a bell. Equity groups with decency and rationale, yet lamentably a few subtle elements shield the Judicial branch from being recently that. The legal branch comprises of the courts framework and the debating of the law. The head of particular court frameworks are judges, and these judges are to complete hearings with sacred decency. Unexpectedly, these judges are regularly not chosen into their positions on that same foremost of reasonableness.

Read More

Texas Judicial System

1152 Words | 5 Pages

In order for judicial candidates to be successful they need to be more visible, “because judicial races tend to have low-visibility races, in which voters are unaware of the candidates.” (288) In order for this to be possible nominees seek to place television ads which are quite costly therefore they need big money contributions to their campaign funds. Since “Texas voters do not give much money to judicial campaigns. . .” (288) it became necessary to find donors elsewhere, “. . .

Read More

The Constrained Court

429 Words | 2 Pages

Courts prove unsuccessful in achieving social change due to the constraints on the court’s power. Rosenburg’s assessment that courts are “an institution that is structurally challenged” demonstrates the Constrained Court view. In this view, the Court’s lack of judicial independence, inability to implement policies, and the limited nature of constitutional rights inhibit courts from producing real social reform. For activists to bring a claim to court, they must frame their goal as a right guaranteed by the constitution, leading to the courts hearing less cases (Rosenburg 11). The nature of the three branches also creates a system of checks and balances in which Congress or the executive branch can reverse a controversial decision, rendering the Court’s impact void.

Read More

Essay On Judicial Selection

801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More

More about Ideology In Criminal Justice

Related Topics

Open Document