ipl-logo

Texas Judicial Selection Process Essay

828 Words4 Pages

In Texas, the selection of judges and the types of judicial selection processes used in the United States are crucial aspects of the legal system that impact the judiciary’s independence and accountability. Understanding the laws of the selection of judges in Texas and the various methods used across the U.S. provides knowledge about how judges are appointed or elected. This paper will include Texas law regarding the selection of most judges in Texas, the types of judicial selection processes used in the U.S., which selection is the best, and what I would do to engage the political process in Texas to pursue my position. The current Texas laws regarding the selection of judges are partisan elections and merit-based selection. Partisan elections involve judicial candidates running for office with a party label, for example, …show more content…

Out of the two selection methods, partisan elections are more voter-oriented than merit-based selections. While Texas has its process for selecting judges in Texas, the United States has its own methods for judge selection. For example, one selection is also through appointments. When a judge is selected by appointment, the governor appoints district and appellate judges to the bench to fill vacancies before an election or to fill judgeships on new courts (Champagne, Harpham, Casellas 2021, 308). Similar to merit-based elections, but in this case voters don’t get to vote whether to elect or evict. Typically, when a judge passes away or retires, it's up to the president and approved by the Senate to appoint the new judge. They’re appointed until death or until that judge decides to retire. Another example of the judge selection method in the United States is commission

Show More
Related
671 Words | 3 Pages

1. Briefly discuss the four general methods of selecting state judges (appointment, partisan election, nonpartisan elections, and merit selection) and choose one in which you feel will result in the best judicial candidate, and why. When selecting a state judge the methods used are diverse compared to selecting a federal court judge since there are four general methods used, this

Read More
1528 Words | 7 Pages

Tulsa L. Rev., 38, 609. Devins, N., & Fisher, L. (1998). Judicial exclusivity and political instability. Virginia Law Review, 83–106.

Read More
694 Words | 3 Pages

Proponents of Nevada's system of electing judges have argued that competitive election of judges is the most democratic way of ensuring that judges remain accountable to the people. Proponents add that elections affirm the electoral beliefs of candidates who present themselves for judicial positions. These arguments rest on the reality that judges cannot be politically neutral in their personal capacities. Rather than conceal the political penchants of judicial candidates, it is better to have them known. Such political inclinations can only be known through campaigns that precede judicial elections.

Read More
167 Words | 1 Pages

The quality of judges would without a doubt increase if they were appointed. However, I do not agree with the idea of judges being appointed. When looking at the partisan aspect you notice several possible issues with one issue being, is that individual the right person to do the job. Partisan election of judges allows for an individual that may not be as qualified for the job to be elected into the position. Nevertheless the partisan election of judges gives the voters what they want based on party affiliation along with qualifications.

Read More
1633 Words | 7 Pages

This essay, will go over the selection process of both the Florida and New York judicial selection process, it will also compare and contrast their selection procedures will be scrutinized plus and include personal views on the best selection procedure between the two. The law consists of the trial court and appellate court which are the two main functional categories; the

Read More
1389 Words | 6 Pages

His rulings as a judge will set the precedent and expectation for the people of the district. There are three cases that

Read More
171 Words | 1 Pages

but it is our choice about who we vote for. This is why I find it critical to challenge change maybe that one person can change the view on how we look at things. Maybe picking that one judge can change a bad ruling and make it right. Texas is one of the largest states in the United States maybe us having the elective system and make a change that would affect the world today. Keeping our political

Read More
807 Words | 4 Pages

In the state of Texas there are two courts of final appeal. The highest court for civil matters is the nine member Texas Supreme Court. The nine member Texas Court Criminal Appeals is for criminal matters. The number and variety of courts are confusing to the average citizen. The judges in these courts have only general qualifications who need not be lawyers and these judges are selected in a partisan election, which is a general election where the candidates are nominated by the political parties and their respective party labels appear on the ballot.

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

In addition to judicial selection methods, at the federal level, the president and senate get to appoint seats to judges, in which they will have for life. In my opinion, I think this selection method is good to some extent because I trust that the president and senate have good judgment when it comes to picking judges that will be independent, fair, and accountable. At the state level, electing judges varies from state to state. In

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

The Texas legislative process is governed by the Texas constitution as well as the House of Representative and the Senate. Its primary function is to enact laws to provide for the health, welfare, education, environment, and economic and general well-being of the citizens of Texas. It also establishes public policy through the passage of bills and resolutions and proposes amendments to the state constitution, which are then submitted to the voters for approval or disapproval. When a bill is proposed, it must go through the legislative process before it becomes a law. The legislative process is very long and has many steps.

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

Texas is a lion's share minority state, which means most our states populace is comprised of minorities. Shockingly, of the states 98 re-appraising judges, on 12 are Latino and just 2 are dark. Out of the greater part of our 3,151 judges statewide, 129 are dark, 491 are Latino, and 481 are female. Some of those measurements cover in minority females, which means the numbers really speak to even less individuals. This disillusioning and inadmissible detail line is caused by a few factors, the first being that most minorities relate to the fair party.

Read More
68 Words | 1 Pages

Dontae you have a really good point. In comparison to appointments however I have to go with the partisan election of judges. Appointments faults are far greater than the partisan’s approach for me. In addition, I looked at the non-partisan type of election and I can see where this would be more effective than both simply due to the voters not knowing their party affiliation but qualifications

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

To win any kind of election/re-election candidates must work to please voters. Here in Texas where a majority of people have a strong pro-death penalty stance, judges must also have a strong stance regarding the death penalty if they would like to remain in office. This is concerning because judges will be more likely to seek he death penalty for the convicted so they can create a record of toughness to win over voters. Some elected judges are sometimes of lesser quality than appointed judges in other states, but since they have a record of toughness everything else is thrown out the window. District attorneys also try to maintain a tough reputation as well.

Read More
1521 Words | 7 Pages

Our legal system allows judges to make important decisions on their own, which is a huge responsibility, and if it falls into the wrong hands, there could be severe

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More

More about Texas Judicial Selection Process Essay

Open Document