ipl-logo

Julian Savulescu's Argument Against The Use Of Genetic Technologies

685 Words3 Pages

In this essay, I will be discussing whether it is morally obligated by parents to use genetically advanced technologies to have a child that is best suited and best expected to have the best life possible. I will be looking at Julian Savulescu view on Procreative Beneficence in support of this idea that the best child should be produced, and in response to Savulescu’s argument I will also be looking at Michael Sandel’s response against the use of genetic technologies. After considering both for and against arguments I will lay forward my response of the idea that… In his paper “Procreative Beneficence: Why we should select the best children”, Savulescu defends the principle of Procreative Beneficence. Procreative Beneficence as explained by …show more content…

The idea of genetic contributions is brought forward as a way of showing how testing can be done to help couples decide which child would be brought into the best life. Savulescu uses the technology of In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) and Pre-implantation Genetic diagnosis (PGD) to explain how couples can pick the best suited child based on disease and non-disease genes. A couple is using IVF to have a child after failure in getting pregnant naturally. It produces two embryos which have had a test performed to see if they carry any common diseases. Embryo A has no abnormalities from the tests performed. Embryo B has no abnormalities on the tests performed except it reveals that it has a chance of developing asthma. Savulescu asks which embryo should be implanted? …show more content…

Savulescu describes best life as “the life with the most well-being,” and that there are three types of well-being that affect the decisions in choosing the best suited child. The first theory of well-being is hedonistic- the idea that what truly matters is the quality of our experiences, that we feel both pain and pleasure. The second theory is the objective list theory- the idea that activities and goals such as developing talents, having children, having a job are good for people to achieve to give life more meaning. The final theory of well-being is the desire-fulfilment – the idea that what matters in life is the degree to which our desires are satisfied. Savulescu suggests that it is some non-disease genes which can affect the likelihood of the child having the best life on the terms of these theories. Imagine there is a gene which contributes significantly to a violent, explosive, uncontrollable temper, and that state causes people significant suffering. Violent outbursts lead a person to come in conflict with the law and fall out of important social relations. In this example, Savulescu states that there is a loss of independence, dignity and important social relations, which do not comply with the theories of the well-being of the person. The person doesn’t have the ability to concentrate or engage and maintain a social relation with

Show More
Related
646 Words | 3 Pages

In Dinesh D’Souza’s “Staying Human”, D’Souza contemplates the technological advances of the biotech revolution. He considers the effects of this revolution, through its benefits and hindrances upon society. D’Souza also contemplates the role parents will play in this society. Because of advances in biotechnology, parents assume the role of creator and attempt to design children according to their will. When utilizing biotechnology, parents determine the values they believe constitutes a “model Child” and attempt to assume the role of creator.

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

Period 5 Quarter 1 Final Essay by Anish Kashyap Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., The Monsters are due on Maple street by Rod Serling, and Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering in Humans by Matt Bird all show that a utopian society is destined to fail. The ways of life in each society show that utopian societies are destined to fail. In Harrison Bergeron, the society is destined to fail because everyone is the same and they have strict laws. In The Monsters are due on Maple Street, the neighborhood is destined to fail because people are prejudiced against others and people make illogical conclusions.

Read More
1008 Words | 5 Pages

As technology improves, so do human capabilities of altering nature, which in turn creates increased responsibility. This directly relates to genetic engineering, which is beginning to morph into a reality. There are advocates for both sides that convey their personal opinions about the hypothetical results, but neither is clearly superior since both arguments speculate upon an unknown future. Hungarian psychologist, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, outlines this topic in his essay “The Future of Happiness,” which focuses on the history of selective breeding and compares the goal of happiness with genetic engineering. Csikszentmihalyi alternates between viewpoints regarding genetic engineering but presents a perspective dominated by warning.

Read More
1257 Words | 6 Pages

Backed by numerous experiences in the field and high credentials, Soniewicka is well equipped to speak on the subject of the ethics of prenatal testing and selective abortion. Where Soniewicka spends the majority of her writing is within the use of logos. Within her journal she breaks down four leading arguments in the selective abortion bioethical debate: utilitarian, principle of procreative beneficence, the rights based approach, and the recognition based approach (Soniewicka 2015). She provides clear and concise explanations that make following her line of thought easy. One such example is her refutation of the utilitarian belief that parents owe a moral obligation to ensure the maximum happiness possible for future children.

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Julian Savulescu argues that genetic enhancement is not only morally permissible, but it is morally obligatory to genetically enhance one’s own child. Savulescu presents three points to defend his claim, but his vague language causes his argument to be unacceptable. Savulescu’s three arguments are as follows. His first argument is about parental duty to fulfill their child’s needs.

Read More
645 Words | 3 Pages

In the essay, Risk Free Life by Leonard Pitts, the author explains that a risk free life is not only impossible, but not fulfilling. People can’t have a life without risks in it or else they would be living in a bubble. Pitts illustrates both sides of this debatable idea by discussing the pros and cons of genetically selecting babies to prevent Alzheimer’s. Although the author is sympathetic to the mother’s decision, he points out that trying to achieve a risk free life and reducing risk is not only impossible but can also reduce life’s pleasures.

Read More
1508 Words | 7 Pages

When they stay longer, the cost is much more. For this reason, many philosophers including Stuart Rachels would argue that conceiving children in an industrialized nation is immoral. This paper will serve to (II.) Explain what Rachels' stance is on parenthood, (III.) Reconstruct his argument, (IV.)

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

One main theme of his essay is the nature versus molding of traits for genetic perfection. Sandel’s own objection in several arguments of genetic enhancement is the ethical responsibility to preserve the giftedness of humans. Sandel defines giftedness as a recognition of talents and powers that are unattainable through human intervention. Furthermore, perfection, according to Sandel, is achieved at the cost of an individual’s acquired experience of humility and responsibility. Concluding this essay, Sandel argues on the idea that "changing our nature to fit the world, rather than the other way around, is actually the deepest form of disempowerment (Sandel 7).

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Autonomy is the concept of an individual 's basic independence from the will of others, and is an essential element of ethical practice. It is fair to establish that the violation of actor autonomy to satisfy personal desire is unethical by general standards. By permitting parents to subject the foundational genetic makeup of their child, a future individual person, to their personal preferences and own desires, unlimited procreative freedom violate the child’s present and future autonomy. Deontological philosophers avoid the unethical violation of autonomy by treating actors as “ends” and never as “means to an end.” In cases of genetic selection, say sex selection, a “desirable” individual is the final goal of the entire process, which clearly treats the child as means to another’s end, not as an end itself.

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

The main issues at hand in the readings for this week has to do with prenatal genetic testing and artificial reproductive technology (ART) and whether it is socially, ethically, and morally right to use these modern technologies to determine the course of a pregnancy. One of the first issues presented in these readings is whether or not selective abortion should be allowed due to results of prenatal genetic testing. One issue related to this is about the two most common types of prenatal genetic testing: amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Amniocentesis is a commonly done prenatal genetic screening done at about the 15th or 16th week of gestation to find genetic or chromosomal abnormalities; however results from the test are

Read More
1584 Words | 7 Pages

Therefore, if two parents are carriers of a certain gene that will disable their child, they can modify that gene to make a child that will not have that disability. As well as some parents will have designer babies to save another child they already have with a certain disease. In this method, parents will choose their child’s blood type and such in order for them to match that other diseased child and potentially give them their blood, marrow, and even organs. Genetically modifying a child’s chance of disease ensures that a child may live a life without potential disease and disability that they may have been more prone to had their parents’ not used this method. This also ensures a healthy life for a child that had a greater potential of having a medical condition due to their parents being carriers of that particular gene.

Read More
1068 Words | 5 Pages

A Case Against Unlimited Procreative Freedom The right to unlimited procreative freedom entails that individuals are free from both direct and indirect interferences from others, as it relates to them pursuing and exercising their procreative capacities. While protecting individual rights from undue infringement is important in liberal democracies, the consequences of allowing unlimited procreative freedom are large. This is especially true in cases where there is increased risk of inheritance of lethal or diseased genetic traits, or where the chance of harm (defined in terms of suffering that would make life not worth living) is definite. In the following paper, I contend that the best argument against unlimited procreative freedom is that the rights of present individuals may be constrained, if their actions have the potential to degrade key aspects of humanity of future autonomous agents or cause irrevocable harm without consent.

Read More
1247 Words | 5 Pages

This procedure’s purpose is to switch out genes for more preferred ones, especially to improve the health of the child. Genetic engineering could permit selection of desired physical and pleasurable traits for non-medical reasons, which has created concern in some people. The process of switching out the genes of a fetus to install genes that are more preferred has brought up debate about whether or not parents should be able to alter their babies genes to make them more appealing to the parents interests. There are many different ways of looking at this procedure and in contrast to other scientific procedures it can be for greater good or for unnecessary enhancement that could potentially create problems in society. Designer babies aren’t morally correct or incorrect, but are in between depending on what it is being used for.

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

The Shawshank Redemption (1994) Marvin, N. (Producer), & Darabont, F. (Director). (1994). The Shawshank Redemption [Motion Picture]. United States: Castle Rock Entertainment.

Read More
1663 Words | 7 Pages

What are the measures for being a human being? Is there any morally relevant break along the biological process of development from the unicellular zygote to birth? In this essay I will discuss why physician should recommend prenatal testing for severe birth defect even if it might encourages abortion therefore I do not agree with the statement above. My argument will based on the following ethical principles and theories: Utilitarianism, Respect for Autonomy and Virtue Firstly I will introduce what each of these ethical theories and principles mean and their implication on this argument. Utilitarianism “Act utilitarianism is solely concerned with achieving the maximum good.

Read More

More about Julian Savulescu's Argument Against The Use Of Genetic Technologies

Related Topics

Open Document