"All animals are equal, some are more equal than others", this phrase is a reminder of the power of corruption when those in authority resort to manipulation and deception to obtain what they want. Manipulative language is exploited throughout all of George Orwell’s novel Animal Farm to justify their authoritarian rule and convince the other animals to go along with their beliefs. This appeal to morality and honor to persuade their counterparts to support their leadership and policies is also persistent in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. Through the comparison of Animal Farm and Julius Caesar, we can see the potential for the abuse of power and the consequences that can result from a strong form of idealism and manipulation. Shakespeare's play …show more content…
He comprehends the importance of appealing to Brutus's emotions and values. Cassius achieves this through emotional language and rhetorical questions that create a sense of urgency and importance in Brutus' mind, making him more open to accepting Cassius’s ideals. For instance, in Act 1, Scene 2, Cassius compares Caesar to a "Colossus," a giant statue. By portraying Caesar as a tyrant oppressing the people, Cassius appeals to Brutus' devotion to Rome and sense of honor, causing him to perceive Caesar as a menace to the Roman Republic. Consequently, Cassius' skillful manipulation of language is a crucial factor in his success in persuading …show more content…
When Brutus expresses concern about their actions being perceived as disloyal, Cassius emphasizes "the fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves,". Cassius also implies they have the ability to control their own fate and that it is their responsibility to do so. Cassius suggests that if they do not act, they will forever remain under Caesar's tyranny, and their destiny will be left to chance. This idea appeals to Brutus's sense of duty and honor, as he believes it is his responsibility to care for the people of Rome and prevent Caesar from becoming a tyrant. By framing the decision as one of personal responsibility rather than a matter of treason, Cassius convinces Brutus to take action. The warning of the possible consequences of inaction serves as a persuasive tool to push Brutus towards joining the conspiracy against Caesar. This foreshadowing, combined with Cassius's emotional language and imagery, ultimately manipulates Brutus and convinces him to join the