ipl-logo

Jurors 'Core Values In The MGM Film Twelve Angry Men'

687 Words3 Pages

When was the last time you had to convince someone to see things your way? I myself can remember in high school trying to convince my mom to let me spend the night out at my friend’s house to go to work the next morning. My job was in the same area that my friend lived in at the time. With the help of my sister to back me up, I was able to convince my mom letting me spend the night out for work. In the 1957 MGM film Twelve Angry Men, Mr. Davis relies on his core values of priorities, words, and personality to a quit the young man charged with murdering his father. However, I would argue that Mr. Davis self-confident core values can be over convincing and take away the clarity of the jurors’ vote. First convincing way Mr. Davis, juror #8 stood …show more content…

Davis used is sense of words in which he say, “There were eleven votes for guilty. It’s not so easy for me to send a boy off to die without talking about it first. He goes on to analyze the case, pointing out the choppy evidence that was presented to them. After discussing the case, Mr. Davis decides to call for a secret ballot vote, stating “Without casting my vote and if all votes come back guilty, I’ll cast my vote for guilty as well.” Which turned out that what was once a unanimous vote of 11-1 favoring guilty, is now at 10-2 still favoring guilty. The change of vote come from the old man juror #9. That gave Mr. Davis, juror #8 the fuel to continue to express his opinion toward the case showing us his …show more content…

Davis personality towards defending the kid grow stronger, he went above and beyond to produce evidence to help with his claim. Mr. Davis stated, “I got this last night in a little junk shop around the corner from the boy’s house. It cost two dollars” which was a replica of the murder weapon used. That action along got the other jurors upset, saying it was illegal for Mr. Davis to have done that. If that was not enough Mr. Davis calls out juror #3 “You want to see this boy die because you personally want it-not because of the facts.” That made the angry juror #3 upset, he tried attacking Mr. Davis, yelling to him he was going to kill him. Mr. Davis said to him, looking directly in his eyes “you really don’t want to kill me, do you?” Asking that question then showed the other jurors in the room, how people can say things out of stress. Such as how the witness claim to see the incident happening in the middle of the night, with a train passing by, and without her glasses

Show More
Related

Juror Three In Twelve Angry Men

186 Words | 1 Pages

As the play went on, Juror Eight started proving how the boy was innocent. In the end Juror Eight changed all the other juror’s minds, except for Juror Three’s. Juror Three ended up changing his vote, not because they changed his mind but because he gave into peer pressure. He still had his prejudice influenced decision, he only gave in because he didn't want it to be a hung jury. Another example, from the same play, is Juror Eight.

Read More

12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

681 Words | 3 Pages

The jurors continually exhibit the opposite of the aforementioned emotions and beliefs. After the protest by the 8th Juror about the oddly quick guilty verdict voted on by the jurors, the 7th Juror dismissed him continually, “It’s just that we’re talking about somebody’s life here. I mean, we can’t decide in five minutes. Suppose we’re wrong? 7TH

Read More

Examples Of Innocence In 12 Angry Men

333 Words | 2 Pages

“A person is innocent until proved guilty in a court of law” In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, an 18-year-old is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence, the three that are in doubt are the old man hearing “I’m going to kill you!” as well as the weapon of choice and how it was replicated, and finally the woman’s testimony. In my opinion, the boy could have been proven guilty, based on these the boy is not guilty.

Read More

Film Review: Jury Duty In The Twelve Angry Men

222 Words | 1 Pages

The Twelve Anger Men in my opinion is an extraordinary movie that depicts a diverse group of twelve men who are charged with jury duty. The twelve men differed in age, race, socio-economic status, and life experiences. The movie begins at the close of a murder trial conducted in a New York City courtroom, as a judge specifically gives the jury men instructions as they prepare to deliberate on the murder trial of a Puerto Rican youth accused of killing his father. Before the men deliberated the judge overly reminded them that a guilty verdict that means an automatic death sentence for the defendant, must be obtained without any reasonable doubt. Subsequently, the movie continues as the group of anger jury-men come face to face with their differences

Read More

Standing Up To The Majority In 12 Angry Men

1191 Words | 5 Pages

The play 12 Angry Men is about a jury of twelve men that are given the task of deciding the fate, guilty or not guilty, of a young boy accused of murdering his father. The theme of standing up against the majority is very prevalent in this story because of the decisions some of the jurors make throughout the play. Juror 8 makes the decision to vote not guilty, he is the one and only juror in this play that decides to vote not guilty for the boy in the beginning. The other eleven jurors decide to vote guilty because of the evidence that they have been presented with. The act of Juror 8 standing against the majority of the other jurors about the case, voting not guilty, allows the jurors to thoroughly dissect the case, understanding it fully and thoughtfully before making their decision of guilty or not guilty.

Read More

Minority Influence In 12 Angry Men

1458 Words | 6 Pages

This movie is the best example of minority influence where in the earlier stage only one juror no. 8 says defendant is not guilty but in the end of the movie we see that he is able to influence all the jurors in a very logical manner which I am going to point out later so that all the jurors lastly says the defendant is not guilty. Minority influence is more likely to occur if the point of view of the minority is consistent, flexible, and appealing to the majority. The juror no. 8 doesn’t know defendant is guilty or not guilty but he has only doubt in his mind which he trying to clear during the entire film and with which he also able to clear the views of other

Read More

The Justice System In Twelve Angry Men

591 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, he tried to make the trial go faster by voting with the side with the most votes. My family in the real world also had to go through inconvenience of the jury duty. My cousin had her first prom and my Aunt got called for jury duty. She couldn’t help her daughter do her hair, makeup, and get pictures. My moms friend also had a conflict with the jury duty.

Read More

Mr Davis In 12 Angry Men

691 Words | 3 Pages

Twelve Angry Men dates back to 1957 when twelve jurors are sitting in front of a murder case. The murder case regards a son being accused of stabbing his father to death. As the jury heads into their room to choose their verdict, the vote begins eleven to one. Only one man in that entire room could find the defendant not guilty. That one man, Mr. Davis, decided to be the difference.

Read More

The Hero of the Story in 'Twelve Angry Men'

1020 Words | 5 Pages

There is also almost always going to be a person who’s going to try and make your victory that much harder for Juror 8, that’s going head to head with Juror 3. With a man who already has his mind set to this thinking…” You come in here with your heart bleeding all over the floor about slums and injustices and you make up those wild stories, and you’ve got a couple of soft-hearted sobs listening to you. Well, I’m not... what’s the matter with you people? This boys is guilty!

Read More

Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men

1011 Words | 5 Pages

This is an important element when deciding who the best and worst jurors were. There were no facts as to who was right or wrong because we didn’t see the crime in question. All

Read More

Examples Of Prejudice In 12 Angry Men

915 Words | 4 Pages

People act upon what they think. Within “12 Angry Men”, all of the jurors have an opinion but some voice their more than others. One juror in particular, Juror Ten, voices his opinion about the boy in question. Repeatedly throughout the play, Juror Ten makes many thoughtless and hurtful comments about a certain kind of people. It is clear that Juror Ten’s uncompromising belief that the accused is guilty is because of his dislike for the boy’s race.

Read More

Social Psychology In The Movie Twelve Angry Men

721 Words | 3 Pages

This theory is practicable inside of the juror’s decisional processes of the “Twelve Angry Men.” Conformity is described from the beginnings of the film. When the jurors cast their initial vote, doubt is clear in many of the jurors whom vote guilty. This inhibition might be commented as weak belief shaked by the guilty majority’s influence. Additionally, though the movie is not provide any references about the timelines of decision this is a relevant factor presumably affecting the “Twelve Angry Men,” and should be considered as a potential element in creating social

Read More

Fallacies In 12 Angry Men

1404 Words | 6 Pages

The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar

Read More

Movie Analysis: Twelve Angry Men

1206 Words | 5 Pages

Even though some took more time and effect than other, a decision was made. In the movie analysis, I will be discussing the how many personalities, moralities, and more contributed to the negotiation and resolution. The most distinctive juror in the movie was Juror eight. This is due to the many different negotiating tactics that he uses. One in particular that got my attention was his motive of appealing the people’s empathy.

Read More

12 Angry Men Case Study

858 Words | 4 Pages

In a New York City, an 18-year-old male from a slum is on a trial claiming that he is responsible for his father death by stabbing him After both sides has finished their closing argument in the trial, the judge asks the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty or not The judge informs the jury decided the boy is guilty, he will face a death sentence as a result of this trial The jurors went into the private room to discuss about this case. At the first vote, all jurors vote guilty apart from Juror 8 (Henry Fonda), he was the only one who voted “Note Guilty” Juror 8 told other jurors that they should discuss about this case before they put a boy into a death sentence

Read More

More about Jurors 'Core Values In The MGM Film Twelve Angry Men'

Related Topics

Open Document