ipl-logo

Jury System Dbq Essay

946 Words4 Pages

Our jury system stretches all the way back in England hundreds of years ago. Whenever a crime was committed in a community, a judge and his or her jury would come together to put the accused on trial. The judge served more as the legal expert over the trial. However, the jury was made up of twelve men who lived in the area that the crime was committed. These ordinary citizens were the ones that decided the verdict of the case. Some may argue that this is an old age idea that doesn’t work with today’s society. However, the jury system is still very effective today. As soon as you receive your driver’s license you are in the drawing to be on a jury. There is a pool of people selected to come participate on the jury, but slowly they are cut down …show more content…

During a Bench Trial, the judge decides what the verdict is and his or her opinion is the only one that matters. However, a Jury Trial uses the opinion of twelve ordinary citizens. Just based on the fact that more people are deciding the verdict makes it more just. One person, the judge, may overlook a small detail. Consequently, the case could have a totally different result if that detail was not overlooked. In 2010 there were 2,352 Jury Trials and 394 Bench Trials. (Document A, 289) Furthermore, 2,066 of the accused during Jury trials were convicted, while as only 257 were found guilty during the Bench Trials. (Document A, 289) This leads some people to think that the Jury was filled with people who jumped to conclusions based on how the accused looked or had an emotional connection with the victim. I believe that the percentage of convicted compared to the acquitted is higher in Jury Trials because they had twelve sets of eyes going over the same case and were able to talk through it with each other. This allows them to make the most accurate decision that they could with the information …show more content…

Consequently, people feel like they are contributing to the country and also have a sense of self-government. “The role of jury service in promoting self-governance and civic participation is hardly an accident. The framers of the United States Constitution viewed Jury service as a critically important feature of self-governance and enshrined the right to serve on juries in the Seventh Amendment.” (Document C, 293) According to the source, titled Jury Service as an Invitation to Citizenship the jury system highly encourages civic participation, which benefits all citizens old enough to vote. “Observers of the American jury system have remarked on its ability to elevate ordinary citizens into self-governors.” (Document C, 293) Many people complain about the amount of government control that there is in America. This is one of the things that gives us a say in our government. This allows us to govern ourselves and work our hardest to choose the correct verdict for the case. “In theory, elections play a similar role in ensuring “the people’s ultimate control in the legislative and executive branches”…” (Document C, 293) Giving away our right to participate on a jury is like giving up our right to vote. Voting allows us to have a say in the executive and legislative branches, which is something highly valued by

Show More
Related
351 Words | 2 Pages

In Twelve Angry Men author, Reginald Rose, demonstrates the importance of not only serving on Jury Duty but a valuable life lesson for the jurors as well. Rose began the play with a description of twelve diverse men with twelve very unique personalities. Rose is trying to consult an illustration on why it’s important to see every piece of evidence by showing emotion through characters resolving them to argue and disagree. He is trying to show how even when you don't want to do something, put an extra 110% of your effort into it, the life of another, isn't something to joke around with. Jury duty is called upon and mandatory when you’re a U.S. citizen.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Another reason citizens question juries is that they have bias from personal experience or the media. The defendant and the prosecution criticize the jury system because the actual jurors may not understand the situation from any point of view because they come from different lifestyles (Doc E). The American jury system is not a good idea anymore because juries are not experts in law, they have bias, and are not “a jury of peers”. Because jurors are not experts in law, they are subject to be

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

The Juries protect people’s rights and liberties through the teamwork with a judge. By working together in great effort they come down to one reasonable idea. Responsibility for justice mostly lies upon honesty and fairness of juries therefore people must rely on jurors for their own protection. Furthermore, a movie ‘’Twelve Angry Men” is great example of juror’s absolute honesty and sense of fairness in order to determine defendant committed a crime or not. The juries justify a defendant because of well clarified facts and the evidence of a murder that they find out by hard team working and their serious attitude toward a

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

Jury service in adversarial court systems is an important civic duty and responsibility. Jurors have to understand and weigh up evidence presented, assess the credibility of witnesses and decide on the likelihood of certain events having occurred in the light of their own personal experiences. There has been increasing interest in whether deaf sign language users should be permitted to serve as jurors. In the USA deaf people have been serving as jurors in criminal trials since 1979. Legal challenges in the UK and Ireland have established that deaf people have the capacity to make decisions as jurors, and can sufficiently comprehend courtroom discourse and jury deliberations through a sign language interpreter (Heffernan, 2010).

Read More
2616 Words | 11 Pages

The jury system is unique for it being the only form of civic participation in delivering justice in criminal trials. The main idea behind still conducting jury trials in many countries is the public trust that a trial by jury is fairer than being tried by a judge and that juries produce better justice. Juries are ideally made up of community members of all different occupations, age, education level, gender, race, culture and sexuality. This can lead to a decision that encompasses the views and opinions of a broad range of society. Since there are twelve jurors, it becomes difficult to bribe them or corrupt them and is reflective of the shared decision rather than having a one judge make an individual decision which could be clouded by individual

Read More
1552 Words | 7 Pages

The judge presided over the trial and served as a legal expert… The jury heard the events and accused guilty or not-guilty (Is The American Jury System Still A Good Idea?). ” Jury trials should remain an option because because we as Americans have the right of the seventh , jurors are only told 100 percent of proven information, and the jurors are not influenced by media, people, or unproven information to make a decision and the

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

If jurors are easily influenced by arguments, the whole purpose of the system will be invalid. Another factor that should not be overlooked is biases from jury members. The lack of professionalism can make them judge the case on irreverent characteristics like if the defendant is black or white, if they are rich or not, etc… This is strictly prohibited in law courts, but the influences in their brain cannot simply be erased just because someone is in

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

This opinion was widely shared, and a year later an amendment was passed to allow for jury convictions by a 10-2 vote. The facts of this case show that the intent of the law is consistent with conflict theory, as it developed from the upper classes desire to minimize the power of the lower

Read More
121 Words | 1 Pages

Let’s start on the idea of a jury system. It’s really not a bad idea, but the implementation of the idea has become a mockery. With the much practiced vetting of jurors, the apathy of jurors, and the biased media coverage (in every way) that they are exposed to I don 't see the system working as planned. Strangely enough we have the capability for a fair and unbiased system base on zero but the black and white writing in law, I speculate what the system would have if our founding fathers had computers. I think would have been automated just to remove bias.

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

THE JURY: Trial and Error in the American Courtroom by Stephen J. Adler is a significant book on reforming the jury system. Alder is the legal Editor at the Wall Street Journal and has done several interviews with lawyers, judges and legal experts in order to better understand the current justice system and to find out solutions to the system’s faults. Alder starts off with a story of how a woman named Maude was acquitted by the jury after charges was set on her for pistol whipping a man who had sewn up her horse's mouth for eating his hay. Alder explains “Maude's case is quintessentially American, and it reveals what we imagine and want our jury system to be. It shows the little guy speaking for all of us, justice handed up from the community, not

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

Jury Duty Jury duty is a very important obligation that every citizen of the United States has bestowed upon them. It is not only a responsibility, but a privilege to be able to serve on a jury. Jury duty is the most direct way to participate in the democracy and the legal system in the United States. Also, as was stated in the video that we watched in class, and then echoed by the person that I interviewed, it is important for the jury to consist of many different people with different backgrounds, and it is important that everyone in the community gets involved with the jury process.

Read More
161 Words | 1 Pages

If we thought a jury, who is part of the court system that deliver justice to be incapable then, we wouldn't have jury

Read More
180 Words | 1 Pages

All people need to be good citizens so that there can be peace in our societies. Notably, jury duty is one of the most effective ways of ensuring that justice prevails in the entire community. Therefore, students should not avoid jury duty as it will show some character of a bad citizenship. Avoiding jury duty is not ethical and it should be discouraged by all means. It should be in everyone’s interest to get justice for every member in the society.

Read More
2035 Words | 9 Pages

The jury system has existed for almost 1000 years dating back to the Norman Conquest of 1066. The first jurors acted as witnesses and gave an account of their knowledge and information about cases, however this has evolved and jurors are now the deciders of facts in both civil and criminal cases. In the UK, the jury consists of 12 members of the public, however in other countries this may differ. Statistics show that less than 1% of criminal cases are tried by juries, while 95% of criminal cases are dealt by the magistrates’ courts. Serving on jury is compulsory for those who are qualified and meet the criteria for the jury service.

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

Evaluate the effectiveness of the law reform process in leading to a more just society. The process of law reform is to decide whether laws work well and is fair to everyone. If not, they will hold and inquiry to look at how they can make it fair and just. To do this they shall conduct research and talk to stakeholders which could be anyone from judges to people who are affected such as yourselves, once they have found everything they can, they shall write a report to conclude on whether they should change the law or not.

Read More

More about Jury System Dbq Essay

Related Topics

Open Document