ipl-logo

Justice In Plato's Republic

1000 Words4 Pages

Justice is characteristically thought of being good for society and virtuous to be just. In Plato’s Republic, he deliberates through Socrates and Glaucon whether justice is good for the soul. In the beginning, Glaucon believes that justice is not a natural function of the soul. However, Socrates is able to convince Glaucon that justice is a part of the soul that is good for humans using the function argument and examples. Socrates describes function as something an object can perform, while virtue allows the object to perform its function well. Socrates presents the function argument and this is where the two have contention. The following is the function argument:
P1: The function of a human soul is to live a human kind of life(353d)
P2: …show more content…

Additionally, if Socrates is able to convince P2 is true, then Glaucon will agree with P3 and P4 because they relate back to P2. Glaucon believes that the reason people act just is because it is a necessary evil, similar to exercising or getting painful medical examinations. He believes the “pain” the necessary evil of justice in the present, will prevent the greater evils in the future. For example, if a person must get a blood test, then they need to have a needle stuck in their arm to withdraw the blood. This procedure may be painful, however, it is a preventative measure to make sure there are no other further issues with the person. Glaucon supposes that humans are natural acquisitive and competitive beings and that acting just is contrary to the human function and virtue. Additionally, Glaucon believes that people suffer from both justice and injustice. Moreover, people would rather suffer justice than injustice from society and that is the reason we form a ‘social contract theory’, that is later developed and elevated under Thomas Hobbes. Nevertheless, Glaucon uses a thought experiment known as the Ring of Gyges to demonstrate that humans are not naturally just souls. The Ring of Gyges gives the wearer the ability to be invisible, which allows the person to act with impunity. Furthermore, he introduces two people, the just and unjust person. He states that if they both receive the Ring of …show more content…

Socrates was able to do this by demonstrating that the soul is similar to a city and it has different parts to it. Additionally, Socrates if these parts do their own task, then they are acting just. Furthermore, a soul that is just is healthy and an unjust one is unhealthy. However, a problem arises for Socrates when one thinks of the cool scoundrel. The cool scoundrel is someone that gets praise for being a criminal and has no ramifications for his/her actions. This is similar to a thief character from Hollywood that gets admiration from the audience because the cool scoundrel does not care if they get in trouble. Also, the cool scoundrel ends up benefiting more from being a criminal. Nevertheless, this example should be viewed as an outlier or even fits the mold of the person’s soul having a sort of “cancer”. Not many people are getting praise for being a criminal in reality and not very many fit the frame of the cool scoundrel. Consequently, Socrates explanation of what justice is more convincing than

Show More
Related

Accomplishments Of Stephen Hopkins

1028 Words | 5 Pages

Stephen Hopkins was born on March 7, 1707 in Scituate (then a part of Providence), Rhode Island. Hopkins was the second oldest signer of the constitution, behind Benjamin Franklin. (1) Growing up Hopkins was supposedly self-educated. Hopkins gained his success purely by his own efforts. Scituate was an agricultural community and Hopkins earned his living farming.

Read More

Martin Luther King Jr And Socrates Comparison Essay

648 Words | 3 Pages

Political activists and philosophers alike have a challenging task of determining the conditions under which citizens are morally entitled to go against the law. Socrates and Martin Luther King, Jr. had different opinions on the obligation of the citizens in a society to obey the law. Although they were willing to accept the legal punishment, King believed that there are clear and definable circumstances where it would be appropriate, and sometimes mandatory, to purposely disobey unjust laws. Socrates did not. Socrates obeyed what he considered to be an unjust verdict because he believed that it was his obligation, as a citizen of Athens, to persuade or obey its Laws, no matter how dire the consequences.

Read More

Socrates Vs. Unjust One In Plato's The Republic

643 Words | 3 Pages

His statement brings up controversy, making the argument fail to back up its point. Socrates argues that a just soul and a just man will live well, and an unjust one badly. This argument consists of the following: 1. The function of each thing is what it alone can do or what it does better than anything else.

Read More

Argument Of Justice In Plato's Book 1 Of The Republic

732 Words | 3 Pages

In Book 1 of the republic, by Plato, we are introduced to two central figures in the argument of justice, Socrates and Thrasymachus. Thrasymachus claims that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates then asks if his understanding, that what is beneficial to the stronger is just and must be beneficial to the weaker people, to which Thrasymachus replies that no, this is not so. He explains that justice is that which obtains the advantage of the stronger.

Read More

Glaucon's Injustice In The Third Class

370 Words | 2 Pages

Socrates thought that the discussion on justice had finished when he adequately answered Thrasymachus’argument, but Glaucon is not satisfied with the conclusion and adds his opinion to the conversation. Glaucon states that all goods can be separated into three classes: things people desire simply for its own sake, such as physical training and medical treatment; things people desire both for its own sake and because we get something out of it, such as happiness; the last class is the things we desire people like only because we get something out of it such as, knowledge and health. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove that justice falls in the third class because we want something out of it. Glaucon states that most people place justice in the first

Read More

Justice In Glaucon's The Ring Of Gyge

158 Words | 1 Pages

Glaucon goes on to tell the story of The Ring of Gyges. In this story, a man is given a ring that has the power to make him invisible, so that he may perform unjust actions without anyone knowing it was he. Glaucon uses this story to touch on his thoughts about the nature of justice. He believes that by nature, people only act justly because they believe that is what is expected of them. If someone had a ring and they actually chose to not use the rings, others would praise that person, but ultimately, people would think of this person as a fool for not using the power they had.

Read More

Socrates Should Stay In Prison Analysis

710 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates should remain in prison after evaluating Critos arguments although Socrates’s were stronger. I’ll begin with Crito’s argument and what makes them strong, and what doesn’t. Next, I’ll focus on Socrates arguments and what makes them good and what makes them weak, mainly his focus that living with a bad soul isn’t worth living when you have a bad soul. Crito gives Socrates three arguments.

Read More

Analyzing Socrates Argument In Plato's Meno

1060 Words | 5 Pages

In order to establish my thesis, I will start by stating and explaining the argument that Socrates presents, I will

Read More

Socrates Rhetoric Analysis

441 Words | 2 Pages

All these points of understanding thus far bring the dialogue around for Socrates to unequivocally apply his philosophical positions to politics where a just man is analogous to a just city. Socrates declares that “injustice and corruption of the soul is the most shameful thing” and relates this shame to the city-state where it is best to understand where one is wrong in one’s practices than continue into ruin. A citizen must be educated for true democracy to work. This is most evident when he applies his comparison between the apparently good and the actual good to the soul and politics. The soul is affected by flattery, rhetoric, and sophistry in the same way that cookery and cosmetics affects the body; it seems apparently good, healthy, and in order but this is true only by perception.

Read More

Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis

1382 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates bases this view of justice on the worth of living a good life. “And is life worth living for us with that part of us corrupted by unjust actions” (47e) If we corrupt our soul with injustice, our life would not be worth living, therefore one must never commit an injustice. “When one has come to an agreement that is just with someone, one should fulfill it.”(49e) It is this agreement with the Laws that Socrates would be violating, if he were to

Read More

Socrates Definitions Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

1169 Words | 5 Pages

According to Socrates there are two types of justice, the political justice and the justice of a particular man. As we know, city is bigger than a man. Socrates believes that it is easier to find justice at the political level which means in the city, thus he tries to define a just city from scrap, and will see in which stage justice enters. Also, Socrates tries to find justice in the city before finding justice in the individuals because individuals are not at all self-sufficient. We humans have similar needs such as food, clothing and shelter and in order to accomplish these goals human beings form unions, where each and every individual specializes in a field.

Read More

Morality In Socrates 'The Ring Of Gyges'

661 Words | 3 Pages

The passage written by Plato goes in to great detail of how Socrates defends his position and how Glaucon defends his position as well but then leaves the reader to formulate his own opinion. With both Socrates’ position and as well as Glaucons, it is clear to see that Glaucon has the more rational reasoning within the debate of who’s happier, the just or unjust person. In Plato’s writing, The Republic, Glaucon challenge Socrates to describe justice and to give reasoning to why acting justly should be believed to be in anyone's self-interest. Glaucon claims that all goods can be distributed into three classes:

Read More

Private Life In Socrates's Apology

1021 Words | 5 Pages

It is challenging to lead a private life while truly fighting for justice. A man can fight for justice through examining the greatest issues in human nature that Socrates found essential to the private life. However, this knowledge can have the biggest effect when brought into the public life such as through teachings. These two things can then combine to reflect how the state should be changed. Socrates sometimes crossed this line himself, even if unknowingly.

Read More

Plato's Argument On Why The Soul Is Alive

524 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates’ original argument was not valid or sound. The premises were corrected but the argument needed another premise to make the conclusion true. Adding premise two takes away any confusion there was to what immortality meant. Since Socrates’ spent almost the entire book creating a just person and a just city the information about what is good and bad for a soul makes sense. It also makes sense that those things cannot destroy the soul because injustice and other vices could only lead the body to make poor choices and possibly get sick or die from those poor choices.

Read More

Plato's Republic: Just Or Unjust?

832 Words | 4 Pages

Plato's Republic is centered on one simple question: is it always better to be just than unjust? This is something that Socrates addresses both in terms of political communities and the individual person. Plato argues that being just is advantageous to the individual independent of any societal benefits that the individual may incur in virtue of being just. I feel as if Plato’s argument is problematic. There are not enough compelling reasons to make this argument.

Read More

More about Justice In Plato's Republic

Related Topics

Open Document