ipl-logo

Justice In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

458 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Theme of 12 angry men

Have you ever read something and thought, “Wow that just changed my

entire perspective on this”? Well, there is only one drama that comes to mind,

written by the one and only Reginald Rose, and it goes by the name of Twelve Angry

Men. With Rose’s use of suspense and plot twists, this play is very compelling and

keeps readers eager to know what happens next.

Twelve Angry Men concentrates on a jury's decision in a capital homicide

case. A 12-man jury is chosen to deliberate on the first-degree murder trial of an 18-

year-old Latino allegedly stabbing and killing his father. A guilty verdict results in a

definite sentence to the death penalty. The defendant poorly justifies himself and is

against all odds; particularly because …show more content…

Juror #8, the juror who didn’t vote guilty, originally bases his vote more so

for the purpose to at least confront about the case before immediately voting. As the

consultations unfold, the story rapidly turns into an investigation of personalities

2 Turnage

and personal biases are revealed through their emotional reactions and past

hardships.

Reginald Rose precisely defies the normal expectations of a murder case in

the judicial system and ultimately proves that things are more than meets the eye.

The plays theme can best be described as justice. Every person no matter of what

race, gender, religion, or social status should the right to a fair trial. In any case the

defendant is always innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Only Juror #8 was

willing to contemplate on the case before giving a young man the death penalty.

While this drama focuses on several characters, the two most involved

characters can be narrowed down to Juror #3 and Juror #8. Juror #3 is a

businessman and an overwrought father who has a bad relationship with his

Show More
Related
1247 Words | 5 Pages

While all of the other men have changed their vote to a not guilty verdict, the third jurors remains with his original belief. Even in the very end of the play, he acts hostile against the others trying to change his mind, in saying “Do you think I’m an idiot or something?” (Rose 72). One juror that seems almost impervious to argumentative fallacies and peer pressure is Juror 8. Juror almost displays the ideal juror, and the rest tend to mimic the flaws of the system.

Read More
1083 Words | 5 Pages

Twelve Angry Men is a play written system by Reginald Rose in 1956 to project the bias and fragility of the justice system. Mainly, two of the characters represent the varied opinions and views citizens had in 1950’s America. Through the use of his varied, themes, settings and characters Rose is able to comment on the notion justice and thus, creates and maintains tension throughout the play Twelve Angry Men. Reginald Rose uses setting to create and maintain tension. Tension is seen in the quote, “A very hot summer afternoon.”

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

The play Twelve Angry Men written by Reginald Rose the jury decides whether or not the boy is guilty of murder in the first degree. Juror Eight votes not guilty because, he needs more evidence. Juror Eight is compassionate, when all the other jurors voted the boy guilty. He tenderhearted proclaims that voting him guilty isn’t easy he implies, “Look this kids been kicked around his all his life.” Juror Eight doesn't want to just send the boy off to prison without further investigation.

Read More
808 Words | 4 Pages

Rose’s play tells the story of a murder case trial in which the jurors must decide whether the accused is really guilty. The drama uses setting, dialogue, scene directions, and stage

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

Analysis 4.1 12 Angry Men Jonathan Abreu February 16, 2015 The movie 12 Angry men show us the level of ignorance we as human can get to when we discriminate or simple care less for what is around us unless there is a benefit involve. Through the movie it shows how the juror kept switching sides because they felt peer pressure or simple because they didn’t wanted to be there long. It also show how based on emotions your mind can make you believe on thing without facts. It also shows how past experiences and personal bias were playing big roles deciding guilt or no guilt.

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

A group of juror comprising of 12 men from diverse backgrounds began their early deliberations with 11 of ‘guilty’ and 1 of ‘not guilty’ verdicts. Juror 8 portrayed himself as a charismatic and high self-confident architect. Initially, Juror 1 who played the foreman positioned himself as self-appointed leader of the team in which has led his authority to be challenged as his leadership style lacked in drive and weak. In the contrary, Juror 8 is seen as the emergent leader considering his openness to probing conversations while remaining calm. Implying this openness to the present, it has become crucial that a good decision relies on knowledge, experience, thorough analysis and most importantly critical thinking.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

The justice system that relies on twelve individuals reaching a life-or-death decision has many complications and dangers. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reiginald Rose, illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve people reaching a life-or-death decision because people are biased, they think of a jury system as an inconvenience, and many people aren’t as intelligent as others. The first reason why Reiginald illustrates dangers is because people can be biased or they can stereotype the defendant. The Jurors in Twelve Angry Men relate to this because a few of them were biased and several of them stereotyped the defendant for being from the slums. The defendant in this play was a 19 year old kid from the slums.

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

Story Line 12 men meet at a Jury Room after a trial to decide if a 16 year old man is guilty of killing his father if the man is found guilty the sentence is Death Penalty, this was supposed to be an easy decision, but turn around when one of the members of the Jury was not agree and bought in question the witnesses and what they saw or heard versus what they should. The majority of the members were against Jury number 8, but when he was presenting more remarkable and questionable proves to the case one by one started changing their mind. At the end all the members where agree that was not enough proves to convict this young man to death.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

‘Twelve Angry Men’ written by Reginald Rose, is based on the story of a jury who have to come together to determine the fate of a young boy accused to have murdered his own father. Initially, eleven of the jurors vote not guilty with one of the juror being uncertain of the evidence put before them. As the men argue over the different pieces of evidence, the insanity begins to make sense and the decision becomes clearer as they vote several other times. Rose creates drama and tension in the jury room, clearly exploring through the many issues of prejudice, integrity and compassion, in gaining true justice towards the accused victim. These aspects have been revealed through three character who are Juror 10, Juror 8 and Juror 3.

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

Reasonable doubt proves that critical thinking is important when someone’s life is in someone else’s hands. “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, is a play about twelve jury members who must deliberate and decide the fate of a man who is accused of murdering his father. These twelve men must unanimously agree on whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty without reasonable doubt. Just like the jurors, the readers of this play have not witnessed the crime that took place before the trial started. Everyone, but the writer, is in the dark about who committed the crime.

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

The judge declares the “Murder in the first degree—premeditated homicide—is the most serious charge tried in our criminal courts. One man is dead. The life of another is at stake. If there is a reasonable doubt in your minds as to the guilt of the accused … then you must declare him not guilty. If, however, there is no reasonable doubt, then he must be found guilty.

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

In a New York City, an 18-year-old male from a slum is on a trial claiming that he is responsible for his father death by stabbing him After both sides has finished their closing argument in the trial, the judge asks the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty or not The judge informs the jury decided the boy is guilty, he will face a death sentence as a result of this trial The jurors went into the private room to discuss about this case. At the first vote, all jurors vote guilty apart from Juror 8 (Henry Fonda), he was the only one who voted “Note Guilty” Juror 8 told other jurors that they should discuss about this case before they put a boy into a death sentence

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

Once the jurors are selected, any potential problems with them are dealt with by the lawyers. In this book, jurors are seen to be bribed, tricked, and even threatened so that they have no choice but to deliver the desired

Read More

More about Justice In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

Related Topics

Open Document