ipl-logo

Justice Overrules Morals In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

706 Words3 Pages

Justice Overrules Morals
Should justice be more important than human decency? Lennie and George’s love, brotherhood and friendship is more important than Curley’s definition of justice. Justice isn’t always the same in every scenario but Curley didn’t comprehend that. George should have done more to protect his friend who is almost the same as a brother to him. When will people realize that special needs is not a burden but rather a blessing to be able to better understand other humans. Special needs do deserve special treatment because they are beautiful humans that need a little extra help in life. I believe that George should not have killed Lennie for three main reasons, as a brother figure George should’ve had more respect for Lennie, special …show more content…

Murder is never the answer no matter what excuse you try to use to justify the murder. If everyone acted like George then the world would be in even more serious trouble. If people could walk around murdering their close friends because they thought they had a good enough excuse the world would be in chaos twenty-four seven. Think about murderers walking around on an everyday basis because they felt like it was the right thing to do. Murder is never right and that is the bottom line. No decent human being would take someone else’s life. No one is born with the right to take someone’s last breath for them and that is not a earned thing either. Murder
Rogers 3 is very serious and is never moral. The bible even says in the Ten Commandments that we “Shall not kill.”
Should justice be more important than human decency? The answer is no, justice should never be more important and deep down you know that. I am asking you to take a stand if you are a decent human being and agree with me that killing Lennie was wrong. I am asking you to stand up and take action to show that Lennie’s murder was unjustified and

Show More
Related
53 Words | 1 Pages

The novel Of Mice and Men poses a moral dilemma; is murder ever justified? Should George have murdered Lennie? George should have killed Lennie because worse things would have awaited him if he went to trial. George felt justified in killing Lennie because he felt he was saving him from a worse things.

Read More
171 Words | 1 Pages

Yes, George is justified in killing Lennie due to not letting him be faced against worse odds. George killed Lennie because he didn’t want him to suffer a gruesome death. Once George, Slim, Carlson, and Curley found Curley’s dead wife, Curley got mad and swore and threatened to tear Lennie’s guts out. So himself, Carlson, and Slim teamed up and got their guns to go hunt down and kill Lennie.

Read More
242 Words | 1 Pages

George did the right thing by killing Lennie for multiple reasons. First off, if George did not kill Lennie, he would have suffered a much worse fate with the mob. He did the right thing by putting him out of his misery in the best way. The mob would have tortured him but George provided an instant and almost painless death

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

When exactly is killing ever justified? Or when is it ever okay to decide another person’s fate? In the book Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, George ends up shooting Lennie due to the act Lennie had ended up killing Curleys wife. But what George had done to Lennie was never out of hate, he did it because he didn’t want Curley to do that him. I don’t think George should get arrested for that because of the fact in his head he was doing the greater good for not just everybody but for Lennie as well.

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

Another reason Lennie should not have been killed for what he did was because Lennie doesn't know his own strength. George should not have killed Lennie because he should of taught him that he is stronger, when the first accident happened in Weed. George should have taught Lennie how to control himself when he was little.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

George killing Lennie and if it was justified or condemned is a very controversial discussion and could go either way. So think about these factors and ask yourself the question if what George did was justified or

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

However, no one has the right to end a person 's life, no matter what the reasons for it. A person 's life is individual and

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

Killing another seems very unjustifiable, which might be the case but when someone takes another 's life and sent to prison, death row or capital punishment is needed to put that person were they belong. People like that deserve to die because of their mistake of killing another and it deters other people to not kill others, showing them what would happen. In the case of Capital Punishment, Hunting for Sport, or George and Lennie, killing is a justifiable act. In the case of capital punishment killing is justified and needs to be done. For example, “Some crimes are so inherently evil they demand strict penalties up to and including death”(McClatchy).

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men (1937) is an intensely-focused novella that deals with friendship, trust, the relationship between good and evil and the role of justice. It is the second book in Steinbeck’s trilogy about agricultural labour, alongside with In Dubious Battle (1936) and The Grapes of Wrath (1939). The title, inspired by a line in the poem The Mouse (1875) by the Scottish poet Robert Burns (The best-laid schemes o' mice an ‘men / gang aft agley), encapsulates the spirit of the narration.

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

George has very different morals based on protecting Lennie, his travel companion and friend. His ultimate goal of helping Lennie leads to him ending Lennie’s life in order to prevent his suffering at the hands of Curley. The concept that morality takes precedence over the law in certain cases is manifested through the decision of Curley to hunt Lennie down and the decision of George to end Lennie’s life in Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck. Curley’s decision to hunt Lennie down for the murder of his wife is one circumstance in which a character’s morals are deemed more important than the laws that govern society.

Read More
1046 Words | 5 Pages

Katherine Knight 1 OVERVIEW OF THE CRIME On February 29th of 2000, after finally getting fed up with the constant assaults he endured from his partner; Katherine Knight, John price went to the Scone Magistrates court to take out an apprehended violence order (AVO) against Katherine, in a hope to keep her away from his kids and himself once and for all. Later that night, an unknowing Katherine Knight turned up to John Price’s house and they went on to have sexual intercourse. After this, Knight stabbed Price in his sleep, resulting in Price attempting to run away down the hall, this, however was an unsuccessful attempt and knight ended up stabbing him at-least a further 36 times.

Read More
507 Words | 3 Pages

Some people might think in the opposite side that George should not killed Lennie because Lennie did not mean to anything. He has done it without knowing how strong of himself. Lennie made many troubles this might be because of his disability, but this is the reason that he deserves to live. He has done many thing that make George get into trouble and It is better if Lennie has to die because of George shoot him not the other. "All the time he coulda had such a good time if it was not for you” (Steinbeck).

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

Lennie was unfortunately killed when he could have possibly lived a better life if George gave him the chance. Lennie should not have been killed because he could have potentially been a valuable asset, a good friend to keep company with, and a kind person at heart.

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

In the novella, Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, George’s decision to kill Lennie at the end of the novel was justified. George and Lennie were best friends, and have been since they were little. They got ran out of Weed(the old farm they used to work at) for harassing a girl and not letting her go. He was just scared from her screaming and kicking. He didn’t mean to harm, or scare her.

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

In the novel “Of Mice and Men” John Steinbeck portrays the theme of social injustice throughout the story in the lives of several characters that include Lennie, Curley’s Wife, and the stable buck, Crooks. All of these characters are mistreated in some way, shape or form. The hardships that these characters faced help guide us to see the social injustice that is prevalent in the story. Lennie is a victim of social injustice due to the fact that he is mentally disabled. He is not treated fairly when he was accused of rape.

Read More

More about Justice Overrules Morals In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

Related Topics

Open Document